• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

USA Today: A disturbing sex trend called 'stealthing' is on the rise

Status
Not open for further replies.
Maybe that was the wrong term, but basically its when you're having sex with a girl from behind and you allow your friend who has been hiding in the room to tag in without her knowing. The big reaction moment comes when the guy she thought she was having sex with walks in front of her.

I remember reading about it here on GAF somewhere last year
You ever Poltergeist her? Poltergeist is good. What you need your friend, though, right? Like you fucking her from behind and then you sneak out and he takes your place and then you walk outside and wave at her through the window. And then you go, I’m here.
 
Statistically more stds happen with people in committed relationships than not because of the "trust" factor making people think it's ok to have unprotected sex.

You think you can trust someone but they go and bone someone on the side without you knowing, then you have unprotected sex, and contract side person's std.

I mean, maybe, but I also would still not be with someone I would even passively not trust to cheat on me. At some point, it has to be there, you know?
 

Dabanton

Member
That sounds so fucking stupid I can't imagine that many of the internet bragging aren't just losers lying about it.

Pretty much. I don't doubt some sickos have done this but losers bragging on a forum I don't believe their duck tales.

These guys live for trying to shock people.
 
Someone did this to my best friend during my college days. She called me crying and hysterical. She told the guy no, but he persisted and she agreed only if he would use a condom. He did, then took it off during it, and held her down while she yelled at him to get off.

When I found out about it, we reported him to the campus police and the best the school could do is expel him for rape and put it on his record. He's lucky I never tracked him down.

I don't understand why someone would brag about it though. If they ended up getting the girl pregnant, then bye bye paycheck for the next 18 years, or go to jail for not paying child support.
 
Rape is always difficult to prove. How is this different?

I guess because a condom breaking is something that actually does happen under completely consensual circumstances, so you'd basically be saying that a broken condom is now prosecutable.

It's just going to take a lot more to prosecute this if there is no hard evidence and the person claims that it broke unintentionally.
 
I'll never understand why people wanna go without a condom. It's crazy to me. To risk pregnancy and the chance of an std? For what? Raw sex? Hell nah fam.
 
i've only ever heard of this in the (i think more fucked up) context of men having sex with men, where an HIV+ guy will sneak the condom off in order to try and infect the bottom dude. :/

man

guys are fucked up

Those 'bug chasing' stories/forums were one of the first truly fucked up things I remember reading about on the internet. To this day I still think it's up there as the worst.
 
Sounds like what you see in some porn and hentai vids/comics, without the realization that those aren't actually real.

Why on Earth woudl one want to open themselves to STD's or caring for an unwanted child?
 
It's 100% rape. Someone does something I haven't consented to while having sex that is rape, especially something that could damage and destroy my life.
As long as its also rape if a woman lies about being on the pill, seems fair and fine to me.
 
Maybe that was the wrong term, but basically its when you're having sex with a girl from behind and you allow your friend who has been hiding in the room to tag in without her knowing. The big reaction moment comes when the guy she thought she was having sex with walks in front of her.

I remember reading about it here on GAF somewhere last year

Unless someone can swap places like a ninja AND found their penis twin, I have no idea how the woman wouldn't know when the "switch" happened.
 

Barzul

Member
Women can't tell when the condom comes off? Because every female I've been with that I've asked the question of which kind of sex they preferred always told me that there's a clearly diff btw protected and unprotected sex and that they "feel" more...so I thoughr for sure the difference sorta jumped out at them. Guess I should've asked that too.

On the actual issue. It's despicable and dangerous to do this, and laws definitely need to account for it.
 

Shanlei91

Sonic handles my blue balls
Hey a new sex trend from the media. We haven't had those in awhile. And it doesn't involve teenagers. This is a good one.

Only cause teenagers don't use protection!

Now this is a weird trend...

"LOL guys I sneakily took off my condom and opened up my risk to contracting HIV and getting her pregnant and paying for her and a kid for the rest of my life! AWESOMMMEEEE"

Seriously. People are so dumb.
 

FStubbs

Member
So I'm pretty sure the GOP will take issue with this being considered a crime or even unethical. Anyone wanna take me up on that?

No, there would a huge split in the GOP over this. Sure, a good number of them would be against protecting women. But you'd have a bigger section drawing a line here because these are UNMARRIED people doing this, and so they'd throw the book at them.

EDIT: Long story short, the traditional right would throw the book at them, while the alt-right would defend this practice.
 

Linkura

Member
Not excusing the behavior at all (it's fucking disgusting) but... as a woman I have no idea how this would happen and the man would get away with it in a normal situation. I would sure as shit notice if a condom came off during sex- it feels completely different from without. And I would sure as shit notice if he came without a condom as well. The only way I would think this would work would be by targeting impaired (drunk, on drugs, etc) women who might not notice because of their condition.
 

FStubbs

Member
I heard about "getting pozzed" years ago and it still gives me chills. Can't believe there are people who are into that stuff.

I thought it was more gay guys TRYING to get these diseases, though I wouldn't be surprised people are out there trying to infect people. Some people are sick.
 

NervousXtian

Thought Emoji Movie was good. Take that as you will.
This is strange. I don't think it's very wide spread.. and if you read the other stories online (which is where I saw it) they linked to a website with an anonymous guy who has a fetish of dropping his load into unsuspecting women.

It's not even a bareback.. it's messing with the condom, oops I came, etc. If the guy is real, which I have doubts as it reads more like fiction, he is a sexual predator.

...but I don't know about changing laws. So either stealthing is about bareback or stealthing is about cumming inside. The articles don't make it clear, but then again there's a reason as there's not much actual info that this is a widespread thing.

Guys have been talking girl's out of condoms since they became a thing, and guys probably used the pull-out for millennia before that. If the law was changed that made it rape if a condom breaks that's fucked up.

You'd have to prove intent.

If a guy does this without consent (taking off the condom) he's an asshole.. and probably should be held accountable.

I believe countries outside have laws that cover that exact same thing... and isn't that what Julian Assange is accused of doing?
 

Taker666

Member
Obviously it's a terrible thing to do...but I'm not sure it could be called rape 100% of the time.

If the person notices you removing the condom, tells you clearly to stop..but you continue to completion..then that's clearly rape.

..but if the person doesn't notice during the act ..is it rape? or just very wrong (due to tricking them into unsafe sex)?
 

Deepwater

Member
Obviously it's a terrible thing to do...but I'm not sure it could be called rape 100% of the time.

If the person notices you removing the condom, tells you clearly to stop..but you continue to completion..then that's clearly rape.

..but if the person doesn't notice during the act ..is it rape? or just very wrong (due to tricking them into unsafe sex)?

If you did not consent to unprotected sex, if it happens without your knowledge then it's rape. point blank period.

I don't know why people are having issue crossing this bridge to get to this point.
 
Obviously it's a terrible thing to do...but I'm not sure it could be called rape 100% of the time.

If the person notices you removing the condom, tells you clearly to stop..but you continue to completion..then that's clearly rape.

..but if the person doesn't notice during the act ..is it rape? or just very wrong (due to tricking them into unsafe sex)?

Guy, if you're taking a condom off while fuckin', something better be communicated first. That's not a thing you "just do"
 

Taker666

Member
If you did not consent to unprotected sex, if it happens without your knowledge then it's rape. point blank period.

I don't know why people are having issue crossing this bridge to get to this point.

..but if that's the case then any woman who tells a man she is on birth control but isn't..is also guilty of rape.
 

linkboy

Member
Obviously it's a terrible thing to do...but I'm not sure it could be called rape 100% of the time.

If the person notices you removing the condom, tells you clearly to stop..but you continue to completion..then that's clearly rape.

..but if the person doesn't notice during the act ..is it rape? or just very wrong (due to tricking them into unsafe sex)?

It's rape.

The person didn't consent to sex without a condom. They agreed to have sex under the assumption that protection would be provided to

A) Prevent pregnancy

B) Prevent STD's

You're betraying that person's trust.
 

RDreamer

Member
Obviously it's a terrible thing to do...but I'm not sure it could be called rape 100% of the time.

If the person notices you removing the condom, tells you clearly to stop..but you continue to completion..then that's clearly rape.

..but if the person doesn't notice during the act ..is it rape? or just very wrong (due to tricking them into unsafe sex)?

This is a bad metric to use. You're literally saying it can't be rape if the victim doesn't notice it happening, which is kinda bad considering a lot of rape happens when the victim is passed out.

..but if that's the case then any woman who tells a man she is on birth control but isn't..is also guilty of rape.

I mean... yeah, I'd probably agree to that.

As I said earlier in this thread, I had some extended family talking about doing just that so they wouldn't have to convince their husbands to have kids like actual adults should have to. I was fucking horrified. You're doing something your partner didn't consent to. That's rape.

Now, that's gonna be hard as fuck to prosecute and prove, obviously.
 

Deepwater

Member
..but if that's the case then any woman who tells a man she is on birth control but isn't..is also guilty of rape.

okay great. are you finished making your point now?

edit: I also did not know birth control prevented STDs. condom usage is a health issue as much as it is a pregnancy issue
 
Wow, at some of you. Fucking idiots.

Yes, it's rape.

Sex is a choice or agreement between to people, like any contract. It has provisions. You violate the provisions, you're liable.

Let's break it down for some of you children.

If he/she says "stop" in the middle of sex and you keep going, it's rape. Duh.

If he/she says "sure, if you use a condom," then you were only given consent to sex on the provision that a condom is worn. If one is not worn, they are not consenting. JFC. If you keep going knowing full well you're breaking the agreement, knowing full well your partner would have told you to stop had they known what you were doing, It's rape. Not all rape is violent. Get over yourselves.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom