I agree. Way too specific. They specifically call out that it is the best console version as well and then the 60fps/1080p. Hope it is accurate, if it is not, that is some blatant lying going on.
Guys if this is true it will be unprecedented for a open world game on a console.
Can you name me any open world game on any generation on a console that ran at 60 FPS or close to that?
And no last gen port or online gaming, a single player with high production values that achieved it, I don't think there is.
That's why i find it hard to believe this is true as well, they will strive to push better visuals if it was achievable.
This is from games of thrones right? I haven't watched game of thrones xD.
It's probably 60fps like Tomb Raider is 60fps.
What if s/he end up confirming it... What then?Surely there's some Ubisoft employee on Twitter who could debunk this with a single sentence?
What if s/he end up confirming it... What then?
So did the TRDE devs...I'm pretty sure Ubisoft went on record to say they are targeting 30fps - http://www.videogamer.com/xboxone/watch_dogs/news/watch_dogs_is_30fps_on_ps4_and_xbox_one.html
Then there's 2 already. MGS:GZ is 'open world' as wellPS4 runs at least one rather open world game (~1500 square miles / ~4000 square km per map usually) at 1080p/60L without any glitch.
War Thunder, airplane sim, but still...
Honestly I don't really care (I will probably play on PC), I'm here for the inevitable meltdowns.Then.. we'd be happy?
It would certainly look better. The subjectivity thing is that some people don't seem to like to be reminded of the fact that the image consists of pixels, and that they're really just playing a game.
Not saying It isn't true, but this was in print on the case for this dreamcast game. I didn't see 60fps at ANY time.
Point being, just because it is in print, doesn't mean it is correct.
Guys if this is true it will be unprecedented for a open world game on a console.
Can you name me any open world game on any generation on a console that ran at 60 FPS or close to that?
And no last gen port or online gaming, a single player with high production values that achieved it, I don't think there is.
That's why i find it hard to believe this is true as well, they will strive to push better visuals if it was achievable.
Not saying It isn't true, but this was in print on the case for this dreamcast game. I didn't see 60fps at ANY time.
Point being, just because it is in print, doesn't mean it is correct.
So, not at all.
Did you actually play it? It averages well above 50.
I don't, but image quality and performance wise, The Last of Us was *far* from the best looking game of the console generation.
Ubisoft themselves said 30 fps is the gold standard for open world.
Well that is a pleasant surprise and I do believe it, without question it seems more than plausible to me.Just saw this on the playstation website, probably a typo right?
http://www.playstation.com/en-us/games/watch-dogs-ps4?CMP=soc_us__gm_psblog_topbanner_3_4_14
edit:Seems a little weird to be a typo because they type as header " the true watch_dogs experience" ?
http://a.pomf.se/fwimqd.webmcool, where can i buy that game?
I hope you're wrong so I can quote you on this. They have plenty of talent and ambition. You sound ridiculous.It's Ubi so no. They don't have the talent nor the ambition for 60fps. It's 26 fps.
And Rayman is like a billion FPSI hope you're wrong so I can quote you on this. They have plenty of talent and ambition. You sound ridiculous.
Isn't Assassin's Creed IV 30fps? Why would this be 60fps?
I would rather have locked 60 or locked 30 rather than the possibility of horrible tearing.
I'm on PC anyway so it's not an issue, but I wish more devs would give a choice like Titanfall did on the 360.
I hope you're wrong so I can quote you on this. They have plenty of talent and ambition. You sound ridiculous.