• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

What are you reading? (March 2012)

gdt

Member
Not reading much right now. A bit ago i finished rereading Asimovs major series (my favorite author btw, and Foundation is my favorite series, counting all 15 books) so now im reading his complete short stories volume 1. After is Buy Jupiter, another ss collection (has a few stories not in the other one). Also gonna start rereading A Dance of Dragons soon too.
 

Erico

Unconfirmed Member
Finshed Jay Taylor's The Generalissimo: Chiang Kai-shek and the Struggle for Modern China.
6383363.jpg

Gives a great modern and somewhat tragic account of Chiang as the helmsman of Nationalist China, and disproves many of the long-held stereotypes of him as the man who gave away China to the CCP.

Taylor shows how Chiang's personality contained the right mix of Confucian-principled incorruptibility and surprising practicality that made him the ideal candidate for the job of reforming Chinese society and government for the modern world. Though realistically, the job was an impossible one, given Communist interference, the Japanese invasion, the rampant corruption and reactionism endemic to Chinese culture, and a fundamental misunderstanding by Western powers of Chiang's methods.

Great read.
 

Fjordson

Member
After that is done (this week hopefully) I am moving on to this:

7235533.jpg


I have been putting this off for a while but I am ready to dive into it, and can't wait for him to get the final book of the WoT out.
This book gets so much praise everywhere I look. Really tempted to try it, in the mood for some epic fantasy. Though the only thing I've read from Sanderson is Mistborn. Wasn't a big fan so, I dunno.
 
I'm rereading Soseki's "I am a Cat", a book I revere despite not being very fond of cats.

I just randomly read through the first few pages again yesterday and was rolling. I love that book so much. I think I'll reread it again this year, though I will probably take a break between each section instead of reading the whole thing straight through.
 

RickA238

Member
Read Macbeth earlier this week:

250px-Thomas_Keene_in_Macbeth_1884_Wikipedia_crop.png


Currently about halfway through Speaker for the Dead:

images


Great so far, hopefully I can finish it today. By the way, I hate the U.S. cover for this book. I don't even understand what the hell it's supposed to be.
 

Fintan

Member
I'm currently 6 stories into For Esmé with Love and Squalor (otherwise known as Nine Stories) by J.D. Salinger. I've never really read short stories before but I'm really enjoying this collection. High quality throughout the book so far.

41O7e3uKfxL._BO2,204,203,TopRight,35,-76_AA300_SH20_OU02_.jpg


I'm not sure what to read next. I'm thinking of finally getting around to Hemingway like I said I would in the other thread or possibly getting back into American Gods.

I also read both of Chris Jericho's autobiographies over the last couple of weeks.
 
Got it at a book sale for 25 cents. No cover or anything. Just started reading it at the sale and was liking it so I bought it, took it home, read it and then found out it was a part of a huge series. Ever since then though I have been going through Asimov's works chronologically to make up for my error. :b

Hah, that's like the time I accidentally read Ender's Shadow instead of starting with Enders Game. Oops.
 
Finished god is Not Great the other day, so I'm going to continue reading Mockingjay. Hunger Game film is almost out, so I thought it would be the best time to finally finish the series.

I might read Forever War afterwards.
 

Vyer

Member
Got it at a book sale for 25 cents. No cover or anything. Just started reading it at the sale and was liking it so I bought it, took it home, read it and then found out it was a part of a huge series. Ever since then though I have been going through Asimov's works chronologically to make up for my error. :b

I did this with Wheel of Time, actually. Off the top of my head I still don't think I ever read the first book.
or the last four
 

Metaroo

Member
I recently finished Murakami's 1Q84 and decided to get into his other works right away. I'm halfway through Kafka on the Shore, and I just got Wind-Up Bird Chronicles, which I'm hoping to dig into before this week is over. Also got this:

mark-twain-autobiography_222.jpg
 

relaxor

what?
The_Dead_Hand_by_Hoffman


It's pretty amazing how much money the US has poured into theater missile defense for the last thirty years. An effective black-ops money hole.

Lately I've been rereading The Master of Go by Yasunari Kawabata. I highly highly recommend this to all you game fans out there...

P20131.jpg
 

Mumei

Member
Finished

7099317.jpg


Started

444380.jpg


I just love George MacDonald's fairy tales. I read Penguin's collection of his short stories, but that's the first full children's novel I'd read. It's very Victorian (the authorial asides being one of my favorite parts), but with some great subversive - for his time - gender role stuff that goes on, which is a common element in a lot of his fairy tales. And naturally he Christian / religious allegorical elements in it, though I probably more than I picked up if the Penguin book is any indication of how he wrote his full length fairy tales. The Princess and Curdie is the sequel to The Princess and the Goblin, naturally.

The Hollow Hills, which was in my last post, was excellent; basically historicizing the tale of Merlin and Arthur, setting it in the fifth-century and making the magic rather limited. It's a really interesting approach that I think works very well. I have liked all of the Arthurian mythos-related fantasy I've tried (though I thought Fionavar was weaker than Mary Stewart's Merlin series or The Once and Future King). I have Le Morte d'Arthur out from the library so I'm going to try that eventually.
 

Piecake

Member
This book gets so much praise everywhere I look. Really tempted to try it, in the mood for some epic fantasy. Though the only thing I've read from Sanderson is Mistborn. Wasn't a big fan so, I dunno.

I was not impressed with Mistborn at all, but I really liked this book a lot. One of the problems I had with Mistborn is that I felt that the characters were really quite poor. I felt that they all spoke with the same 'voice', if you get my meaning. None of them really felt alive or dynamic.

Way of Kings does a much better job of differentiating character voice and makes the characters feel more distinct and interesting. The plot is not defeat typical bad guy either
 

Fjordson

Member
I was not impressed with Mistborn at all, but I really liked this book a lot. One of the problems I had with Mistborn is that I felt that the characters were really quite poor. I felt that they all spoke with the same 'voice', if you get my meaning. None of them really felt alive or dynamic.

Way of Kings does a much better job of differentiating character voice and makes the characters feel more distinct and interesting. The plot is not defeat typical bad guy either
Damn, you hit the nail on the head as far as one of my problems with Mistborn. All I can remember is every character raising a "single eyebrow" every page :lol wasn't really a fan of any of the characters.

Guess I might try it sometime soon. Thanks.
 

Mumei

Member
I was not impressed with Mistborn at all, but I really liked this book a lot. One of the problems I had with Mistborn is that I felt that the characters were really quite poor. I felt that they all spoke with the same 'voice', if you get my meaning. None of them really felt alive or dynamic.

Way of Kings does a much better job of differentiating character voice and makes the characters feel more distinct and interesting. The plot is not defeat typical bad guy either

I can agree with this about Mistborn, despite really enjoying it. It was more about the roller coaster ride of the plot than the characters for me, I think. It's good to hear that he's apparently getting better there, though.
 

Ceebs

Member
I have taken a break from my usual reading and decided to REALLY experiment.

So I borrowed a stack of chick-lit from a friend and started reading.

I swear reading 3 or 4 of these books will make you glad to be a man if this is the sort of neurosis women connect with.

Still some of them are not bad reads if you are like my and find generic romcoms a guilty pleasure. I'll type up some mini reviews a bit later.
 
Picked up "Kafka on the Shore" by Haruki Murakami to read on my way to GDC. It's a fantastic novel so far. I'm loving the split story structure. (This is my first Murakami.)
 

Mumei

Member
I have taken a break from my usual reading and decided to REALLY experiment.

So I borrowed a stack of chick-lit from a friend and started reading.

I swear reading 3 or 4 of these books will make you glad to be a man if this is the sort of neurosis women connect with.

Still some of them are not bad reads if you are like my and find generic romcoms a guilty pleasure. I'll type up some mini reviews a bit later.

What are the titles? The only book I've read that is chick-lit-y is Jane Eyre, but I would be interested in trying others.
 

Blatz

Member
Just finished and enjoyed, Assassin's Apprentice
512fyuyPesL._SY90_.jpg


Will be returning to the Farseer trilogy, but just to mix things up a bit will next start in on either...

I really enjoyed the farseer trilogy. The ending is fantastic. Make sure you stick with it.

Currently reading this and it's great -

51gbLr5N0yL._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-click,TopRight,35,-76_AA300_SH20_AA278_PIkin4,BottomRight,-65,22_AA300_SH20_OU01_.jpg


I'm surprised I don't see more Scott Lynch love on GAF.
 

AnkitT

Member
Just on the last few pages of this:
aKBQf.jpg


Pretty awesome book, had a flashback of 12th grade with all those Maxwell equations lol.

Next up will be:

5QVhS.jpg


Had already started with a few pages, and I can tell i'll be loving this! My first David Foster Wallace.
 

kruis

Exposing the sinister cartel of retailers who allow companies to pay for advertising space.
What are the titles? The only book I've read that is chick-lit-y is Jane Eyre, but I would be interested in trying others.

Eh? Jane Eyre is a bona fide literary classic. Chick lit are books specifically written for young *modern* woman like Sex and the City, The Devil Wears Prada or the Bridget Jones books. Jane Austen and the Bronte sisters aren't chick lit.
 

udllpn

Member
Had already started with a few pages, and I can tell i'll be loving this! My first David Foster Wallace.

This book was also the first one I read written by him. I really recommend you to go to The Broom of the System after you finish it instead of reading Infinite Jest or another short story collection.
 
Had already started with a few pages, and I can tell i'll be loving this! My first David Foster Wallace.

Woot! Another convert!

But I would NEVER start someone on DFW with Brief Interviews. A lot of folks think it best to start with his nonfiction, and I'd be tempted to agree. In fact, I'm pretty sure I never actually finished Brief Interviews, so maybe it's time to revisit that...
 
I really recommend you to go to The Broom of the System after you finish it instead of reading Infinite Jest or another short story collection.

You know, if you're into big horkin' books that are complex/difficult/all-those-things-while-still-being-accessible, there's no reason NOT to read IJ. It was my first DFW, and while I'm a stubborn bastard, I'm pretty sure that had nothing to do with blowing through IJ; once you get into the swing of it, I find it somewhat stupifying that people DON'T finish it.
 

Mumei

Member
Eh? Jane Eyre is a bona fide literary classic. Chick lit are books specifically written for young *modern* woman like Sex and the City, The Devil Wears Prada or the Bridget Jones books. Jane Austen and the Bronte sisters aren't chick lit.

Why can't it be both? Wasn't Jane Eyre written for the modern 19th-century British woman?
 

udllpn

Member
You know, if you're into big horkin' books that are complex/difficult/all-those-things-while-still-being-accessible, there's no reason NOT to read IJ. It was my first DFW, and while I'm a stubborn bastard, I'm pretty sure that had nothing to do with blowing through IJ; once you get into the swing of it, I find it somewhat stupifying that people DON'T finish it.

I agree, of course. In fact, I'm still reading Infinite Jest to this day (bit by bit).

What I meant is that reading The Broom of the System before IJ is a way of not being intimidated by the latter, and the thruth is I really enjoyed it. I always prefer reading books chronologically, as they were written, but that is just my own preference.
 

mu cephei

Member
Why can't it be both? Wasn't Jane Eyre written for the modern 19th-century British woman?

I'm pretty sure that Austen and the Brontes wrote for people in general, not women or men specifically. 'The Novel' was still a fledgeling genre itself at the time they were writing. But hey I haven't studied English Lit past school so I could be wrong.
 

kruis

Exposing the sinister cartel of retailers who allow companies to pay for advertising space.
Why can't it be both? Wasn't Jane Eyre written for the modern 19th-century British woman?

The Brontë sisters used male pseudonyms to get their debut novels published. I don't think they were doing this in order to sell more copies to 19th century 20-30 year old women.
 
What I meant is that reading The Broom of the System before IJ is a way of not being intimidated by the latter, and the thruth is I really enjoyed it. I always prefer reading books chronologically, as they were written, but that is just my own preference.

Funny you should mention, because I read Broom after IJ. And of course the former felt like an ace pitcher throwing in the bullpen before going out and throwing a no-hitter. But seriously - he wrote Broom as an *undergrad*, so that, in and of itself, is mind-blowing.
 

Ceebs

Member
Ok, as promised a short selection of Chick-lit from a male perspective. The friend I borrowed these from knows that I LOVE the movie Notting Hill so there is a bit of a theme to the ones she loaned me.

fanfare-by-renee-ahdieh.jpg

Fanfare by Renee Ahdieh

The current heart throb movie star in town for a meet and greet at mall meets a woman who has wasted her entire day waiting in line so that her nieces could meet him. She leaves her ipod behind on accident. Said movie star ends up with it and in the process of returning it they start exchanging emails. Romance follows from here. This one deals mainly with the female lead getting over her ex who dumped her just before her wedding and learning that she deserves to be happy. Was a pretty enjoyable read overall though.

too-perfect-julie-ortolon-paperback-cover-art.jpg

Too Perfect by Julie Ortolon

Woman is on a trip to overcome her fears of traveling when she somehow misses her cruise ship leaving her stranded on St. Barts. Determined to not rush home with her tail between her legs she takes a job as a housekeeper for a rich recluse who she thinks is some disfigured man. Turns out he is actually a world famous guy who is hiding from the paparazzi. They establish a connection without ever meeting face to face. Romance follows from here. Another one dealing with a woman overcoming her issues (image perception is the main one here) A light read with a bit of a weak third act. Still reasonably enjoyable.

51IOA1shFnL._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-click,TopRight,35,-76_AA300_SH20_OU01_.jpg

Just the Sexiest Man Alive by Julie James

Hotshot lawyer is in LA for a big case and gets saddled with the biggest womanizing movie star in town to show him the ropes for an upcoming legal thriller. Standard hate each other at first but fall for each other by the end. This one was actually very entertaining and funny.


I read a few more and will type those up later. Pretty much my takeaway is that they are light reading that are 100% predictable but still fun reads. They have all been pretty much romcoms in book form, so you know probably know how you feel about them already. Still a decent look at what women think they want and some of the stuff they deal with on a daily basis, because these types of books would not be nearly as popular if normal women did not see bits of themselves in the characters here.

Not sure how many more from this stack I will make it through before I burn out, but not a terrible waste of a few days of reading time. They are all super easy reads that I tend to go through in just a few hours.
 
Finished this over the weekend:

9781841499048.jpg


Pretty good, enjoyed it more than Weeks' Night Angel Trilogy. The world feels more developed and the magic system is fairly unique. Some good twists and turns as well.


Still working on:

9780312857677.jpg


I am definitely seeing why people have warned me about this series slowing down. I'm about halfway through and nothing has happened at all, really.


Also reading:

9781841494081.jpg


About 150 pages in, very good so far.


And these just arrived in the mail today:

9781937007249.jpg
9780765311771.jpg


Been looking forward to reading both of them but will probably finish something else off first.
 

LiQuid!

I proudly and openly admit to wishing death upon the mothers of people I don't like
hnF3v.jpg


Finished. God bless whatever fucking sorcery is employed
in order to turn this vile, unmitigated slop into a halfway
coherent screenplay. I'm officially done with YA, probably
for the rest of my life.

JAjK4.jpg


About halfway through this. Liking it a lot so far, even
though it covers stuff I have learned over my last half
decade of watching food related television. It's still great
to hear Tony's take on it.

After that I'm probably gonna start Storm of Swords.
To be honest, I'd kinda rather read some sci-fi/fantasy
that isn't currently being turned into popular, visual
entertainment, but I'm getting kinda sick of internet
exposure nickle and diming spoilers for the rest of this
series into me.
 
I'd just like to point out that Jane Eyre is not a literary classic, unless you're only using "classic" in the sense of "tried and true." The book has a certain power in that it's actually still alright 150 years later, which is more than can be said for a lot of 19th Century literature, but it doesn't really stack up against the big dogs of literary history. Ditto Wuthering Heights.

Also, chick-lit is a good and proper term for it. It may not have been intended as such, but modern-day chick lit is probably the closest thing to an antecedent that it has. That's not to say that Jane Eyre is on the same level of pulpiness, mind, but it certainly does have that "romance novel" air about it in certain respects. The problem is in the idea that "chick-lit" and "bad" must necessarily be congruent, which, while often the case, will not hold true 100% of the time.
 

Keen

Aliens ate my babysitter
JAjK4.jpg


About halfway through this. Liking it a lot so far, even
though it covers stuff I have learned over my last half
decade of watching food related television. It's still great
to hear Tony's take on it.

Nice, will probably read that next. Do you read it in Tony's voice? I fear I might :D
 

LiQuid!

I proudly and openly admit to wishing death upon the mothers of people I don't like
Nice, will probably read that next. Do you read it in Tony's voice? I fear I might :D

Yeah, it reads just like his voice overs in No Reservations. It's impossible to read it any other way.

e: spoiler:
Anthony Bourdain did a whole lotta drugs!
 
Top Bottom