• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

How animation was done in the 1930's

Status
Not open for further replies.

Horse Detective

Why the long case?
Its kind of disappointing to know that you need tablets and software to get anywhere in this sort of field these days.

So much expensive shit.
 

MisterHero

Super Member
Fleischer animation produced comics' hardest worker- Jack Kirby. IIRC he was an in-betweener on Popeye and Betty Boop. Another source said he painted frames as well.

Still better than Disney IMO. >_>
 
Its kind of disappointing to know that you need tablets and software to get anywhere in this sort of field these days.

So much expensive shit.

Yeah a dude with a tablet sounds so much more expensive than 100 animators, a paint department, a photo department, management, oh and yeah a huge mechanical iron armature for holding cells.
 

Horse Detective

Why the long case?
Yeah a dude with a tablet sounds so much more expensive than 100 animators, a paint department, a photo department, management, oh and yeah a huge mechanical iron armature for holding cells.

I had this really elaborate plan for a witty response, but then I realized where I am posting.
 
Its kind of disappointing to know that you need tablets and software to get anywhere in this sort of field these days.

So much expensive shit.

Really? It is much easier for an independent person/studio to get create and release something animated (and every other medium) these days than it ever has been. You think you were creating a cartoon in your basement in the 1930s?
 

Angry Fork

Member
Slightly off topic but how come this style of voice/video was used for so long, like up until the 60s. It's like all documentaries/commercials had this kind of propaganda voice narration, with quaint music in the background. Why did it stop though? Did people 'grow up' out of it in the late 60s/early 70s or something?
 

IceCold

Member
Amazing. I love old school animation. Not just because it is so fluid but because the characters have so much more charisma and do goofy things (like how Popeye is twisting his arms and stuff in the video).

Most animation nowadays suck.
 
Slightly off topic but how come this style of voice/video was used for so long, like up until the 60s. It's like all documentaries/commercials had this kind of propaganda voice narration, with quaint music in the background. Why did it stop though? Did people 'grow up' out of it in the late 60s/early 70s or something?

JFK assassination stole our innocence.
 

Ahasverus

Member
Incredible, animation has always been so mental. I remember watching Saint Seiya in the 90's and thinking how the hell did they do that my hand? incredible. And of course, this in the 1930's is just nuts. I love how much... love was put into that. All cartoons of the time are classics.
 

LiquidMetal14

hide your water-based mammals
That takes me back to old footage I watched in the 90's. Can't find it anymore but thanks for posting that. It was very neat to see similar footage that I saw back in the day again.
 

Octavian

Banned
The more amazing thing is that this is the 1930s.... 80 years ago at this point. Everything is completely modern. That's not the amazing concept, of course it is, it's the 1930s, but damn that's the inception of WWII. And that's only 20 years after WWI. 1910s, that's a century ago, I mean they must have been completely modern, too... Of course they were, but it's just weird thinking like that.

I think you could go back to about 1880 maybe and be able to call a man/woman a modern man/woman.
 

Log4Girlz

Member
Amazing. I love old school animation. Not just because it is so fluid but because the characters have so much more charisma and do goofy things (like how Popeye is twisting his arms and stuff in the video).

Most animation nowadays suck.

I long for the old days.
 

MisterHero

Super Member
Slightly off topic but how come this style of voice/video was used for so long, like up until the 60s. It's like all documentaries/commercials had this kind of propaganda voice narration, with quaint music in the background. Why did it stop though? Did people 'grow up' out of it in the late 60s/early 70s or something?
Classy narration in newsreels just doesn't capture the audience like a good old sensational tabloid.
 

Horse Detective

Why the long case?
I think what I meant by my post, is just that it seems like artists need expensive things to be taken seriously as individuals these days.
 

GulAtiCa

Member
Wow, I always knew it was done scene by scene. But never imagined it involved so many people!

Slightly off topic but how come this style of voice/video was used for so long, like up until the 60s. It's like all documentaries/commercials had this kind of propaganda voice narration, with quaint music in the background. Why did it stop though? Did people 'grow up' out of it in the late 60s/early 70s or something?
I wonder that too. I remember seeing so many Disney made documentaries (from space to well anything) from the 50s and before.
 

JordanN

Banned
I really applaud their hardwork.

With no computers back then, they really couldn't afford to make any mistake in drawing out every scene.

Although I see they did do some improvisation (i.e they used reference photographs and created model sets).

I think what I meant by my post, is just that it seems like artists need expensive things to be taken seriously as individuals these days.

You just need a portfolio.
 
With no computers back then, they really couldn't afford to make any mistake in drawing every scene.

Ironically, it takes just as long to make a good looking (i.e., Pixar quality, not Cartoon Network-style-take-clipart-and-run-it-through-Flash) CG film. I think it took something like five years just to make Toy Story, if you ignore scriptwriting and storyboarding
 
If you have the Who Framed Roger Rabbit 25th Anniversary Blu-ray they talk about how they had to use these techniques combined with live action footage to make the movie.

In one scene they discuss how they needed to layer over 400 animation cells onto the film to create the illusion of Bob Hoskins interacting with cartoon characters in the real world.

That movie was amazing before I heard the commentary, but afterward...whole new level of respect.

Anyone else surprised by how many women apparently worked in animation back then?

There's only so many men and women are roughly half the human population, so if you need an extremely large workforce you take what's available.
 

GulAtiCa

Member
Oh, just noticed how the "Filmman Papa" had a Toothbrush moustache (Hitler) mustache. lol

Obviously before WW2, but still kinda funny to see.
 
So painstaking I almost find it hard to believe it was economically viable. I guess these animators weren't making tons of dough.
 

hteng

Banned
gives you an idea how damn organized and professional they are, it requires so much coordination to get just a few seconds of footage done, it's pretty mind blowing. Not saying it isn't so today but these people are pretty much the pioneers in animation back in the day.
 

Trin

Member
Those settings are gorgeous. It certainly looks like a tiresome process though.

Anyone else surprised by how many women apparently worked in animation back then?

A little, yeah, but it does make sense. For a long time the study of art was considered part of the education in bringing up a "proper young lady."
 
gives you an idea how damn organized and professional they are, it requires so much coordination to get just a few seconds of footage done, it's pretty mind blowing. Not saying it isn't so today but these people are pretty much the pioneers in animation back in the day.

Also take in mind these were they days before animation studios could/would unionize, so if the head director didn't like your work (or you,) it could be potentially very difficult to find future work. You didn't have guys like John K back then who would fuck off with half the team and make his own studio if the studio heads told him to make the lead character's hair red instead of green. You had to work as a cohesive, machine-like unit to ensure you got paid.
 

Zeth

Member
So painstaking I almost find it hard to believe it was economically viable. I guess these animators weren't making tons of dough.

Most of it was controlled by film industry giants (like Paramount) in those days. Consolidation of media power might have helped. Awesome video.
 

Divvy

Canadians burned my passport
A lot of animation schools still teach it this way. I did pretty much all of that during my years in the animation program, well except the cels and painting stuff, that's done digitally now. But yeah we wasted mountains and mountains of paper drawing frame after frame so I"m glad it's mostly digital now.
 
The era of many possibly mistreated workers speedily working towards a goal is over. We may not have a steady stream of episodes of an intricately and thoughtfully animated work like Popeye anymore, or even things like the Empire State Building or entire subway lines built in a year ever again, but the tradeoff is definitely worth it.

But that aside, awesome video. I was surprised to see the bird flying around a real 3D model of a mountain. I didn't ever think of mixing 2D cells with 3D scenes.
 

DonMigs85

Member
Really now?

Well you gotta admit, at least for the animation industry today almost everything revolves around making a profit while maximizing merchandising opportunities and cutting as many corners as possible. It gradually started with the limited animation of early Hanna-Barbera cartoons which then progressed to farming out animation to Asia, switching to Flash, etc

Of course there's still stuff made for the sake of art or as a labor of love.

The era of many possibly mistreated workers speedily working towards a goal is over. We may not have a steady stream of episodes of an intricately and thoughtfully animated work like Popeye anymore, or even things like the Empire State Building or entire subway lines built in a year ever again, but the tradeoff is definitely worth it.

But that aside, awesome video. I was surprised to see the bird flying around a real 3D model of a mountain. I didn't ever think of mixing 2D cells with 3D scenes.

Yeah it definitely wouldn't fly today, but hard labor from both Americans and foreign workers made America what it is now. It's still ongoing in China
 

Mariolee

Member
Just shows how lazy and over-entitled we've become in the modern era

This kinda shits on animators in the industry at the moment, which is totally undeserved. It's not like they just poop out cartoons. Of course, we have technology that makes it easier to animate, but that just ups the ante even higher.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom