• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Nintendo full year financial results [23.2B yen loss, 3.6M Wii U/12M 3DS forecast]

Hugstable

Banned
I think he's referring to the half-cooked state of the software that the Wiiu launched with...

That thing crashed a lot and was waaaaay slower. That had to have an impact on potential consumers

What recent console launch hasn't had a half-cooked state of software? I still found Mario U, Zombiu, Tekken Tag 2 and Nintendo Land were all pretty fun games that were released as launch. Every launch system is gonna have games that are rushed out the door and not anyway comparable to the titles the system gets later. I mean I found Killzone alright and Knack fun, but you are still able to tell they were rushed out Launch games just as the launch games of the Wii U. Plus the Wii U launch wasn't all too bad, it was the one time 3rd parties actually released a few games for the system too, even if they were late ports, it doesn't automatically turn AC3, Mass Effect 3, and Call of Duty into straight horrible games.
 

KoopaTheCasual

Junior Member
I guess they could have done success there, a child friendly phone where you'll only be able to exchange numbers in person.
Dude... At first I thought "that's a dumb idea."

But now my mind is thinking, "wait, that's a dumb idea that could be really successful if marketed correctly." And yes I know that Nintendo and solid marketing are no longer that compatible, but I would LOVE to have a cheap, functionally limited smartphone option in the future, for my kid, so he doesn't feel like a huge dork for not having one. (of course he'll be mocked for having the starter smart phone, but its better than nothing).

I currently have no plan to buy my kid a smart phone before he/she is 13, but having a "Babby's first smartphone" option would really push me to invest, to ease the little stinker into the market, while keeping him safe.
 
It's only the top sellers, iirc, not the 1 million + sellers. Note that the lowest seller is 1.85 million. Mario Tennis Open was on the list last year, too.

I was hoping to see Fire Emblem selling over a million could be confirmed. Oh well.

Anyway. Sad to see such low sales for wii-u ,but not too surprising.
Hope nintendo can at least make their WII-U and 3DS forecast for next year.
 
The US hardware market is growing again for systems with software primarily targeting the 15-35 market.
Smartphone remains the smartest thing they could do. Not for adults but for the 5-12 demographic
Or a tablet. They can call it the LeapPad, maybe. If the name's not taken already for some completely unrelated device.
 
How long until:

628x471.jpg


Thank you for your understanding.
 
Dude... At first I thought "that's a dumb idea."

But now my mind is thinking, "wait, that's a dumb idea that could be really successful if marketed correctly." And yes I know that Nintendo and solid marketing are no longer that compatible, but I would LOVE to have a cheap, functionally limited smartphone option in the future, for my kid, so he doesn't feel like a huge dork for not having one. (of course he'll be mocked for having the starter smart phone, but its better than nothing).

I currently have no plan to buy my kid a smart phone before he/she is 13, but having a "Babby's first smartphone" option would really push me to invest, to ease the little stinker into the market, while keeping him safe.
With how parents can be paranoic, you could probably sell this idea hard with correct marketing.
 

Ricky 7

Member
Wii U is such a mess, too much emphasis on the expensive controller to a point where it affected the actual consoles specs and now they can't even lower the price otherwise they'll be making an even bigger loss on it. If they wanted to create a filler console they should have just made another Gamecube which was powerful and cheap, the the Wii U is expensive and weak.
 

Anteo

Member
I want to get a wii u but I'm not sure if I should wait until after all the e3 announcement stuff incase they add new stuff or give it another price drop.

Any suggestions?

You are gonna want to wait till a month or two after e3, remember last time they said "no we are not launching a new 3ds", then announced 3dsxl a week after e3? many gaffers posted they had just bought a 3ds before the announcement
 
Nintendo is in a tricky spot, do they come out with something to compete against Sony and MS, a $350-$400 next gen console or go the cheap route, I say they compete, they need to go in harder then ever, get a next gen console out there, get the third party support w/ their great Nintendo games and market the shit out of it.
 

Fbh

Member
Wow, that's a big loss.

Sadly, and I say this as a happy WiiU owner, I don't think there is much they can do for the WiiU.

They might get some better sales when Mario Kart 8, Smash and Zelda are released but it still won't make much of a difference.
At this point the third party support for it is basically dead. It will forever stay a Nintendo First party machine. It will keep getting great nintendo games but that's not enough to get more sales.

I guess at this point the best they can hope for is trying to make the WiiU sell as much as they can. And then start next gen with a new, more focused, sytstem along ps5 and X4.

They could try to make the 3DS and WiiU to be more connected somehow. Try to convince some of the, much larger, 3DS crowd to get a WiiU



I kinda disagree. The WiiU is an awful console with some really great games.

Edit: Since software is what "makes" a good hardware, most people get the wrong impression about the WiiU. It's dated, slow, not impressive at all. But again, at least 5 "must play" games.

Which basically describes most recent Nintendo Consoles.

Same can be said about the 3DS. If you compare it to the Vita it has dated hardware, slow interface and relies on a gimmick 3D effect that most users seem to dislike.

But it has awesome software which makes it a nice console

They should release the Nintendo Entertainment System 2 in 2015. Announce at E3 2015 and launch on October 18, 2015.

Job done.

And sell like crap because the amazingly well selling Ps4 and X1 will have almost 2 years of advantage, all the big names and third party brands are already going to be on them, and A LOT of people will already have 1 or more friends with a Ps4/X1 (so they will also want one to play online, exchange games, etc).

Not to mention that would loose the trust of a lot of fans and current WiiU owners.
"Why should I get the new Nintendo console if they might just abandon it 2 and a half years later)
 

AniHawk

Member
WOW

3.6M for next fiscal

Those are end-of-life sales.

Wii U successor out Fall 2015 announced by TGS this year

they won't have the software or hardware ready. the new nintendo console is late 2016 at the earliest, with stuff like zelda, smt x fe, and fatal frame probably to fill in the release schedule between 2015 and then.
 
They made a great effort to lure non gamers into playing games with the Wii. I think they must have thought that they would all become regular gamers feom that point on and faithfull to Nintendo. But most of them played Wii sports, a karaoke game and two levels of a Mario game and they went back to watching reallife soaps. Also,... They did 't exactly market this thing right. I even see young gaming people not knowing what the WiiU exactly is. And some gphaven't even heard from it.

Maybe a powerful console with a pro-controller would have been better this time... Who knows.
I guess it will be really hard for them to decide what to do next.
 

Pat

Member
this. smartphones/tablets in five years will be a massive leap from what is out now. gaming on smartphones/tablets can only get better. Nintendo has to then compete with a dedicated handheld in a market were everyone owns a smartphone/tablet that'll easily be able to play games that are similar to what the Vita can offer in quality now. any big publisher could put out a hardcore or casual game capable of delivering almost console quality experiences, smartphones/tablets all the while still being a phone with apps, and other features. how does Nintendo compete?

-releasing a smartphone? sounds costly and unfruitful. i don't know any adult that would be a "Nintendo phone" compared to whats already on the established market, not to mention the amount of money competing with cell phone service providers would cost.

-releasing a high end dedicated handheld? not unless dedicated handheld gaming becomes really niche. it still has to be affordable, expensive handhelds that do nothing but game don't offer much in value compared to consoles, PC's, or tablet/smartphone gaming.

-the kids market? in five years time kids and tablet/smartphone gaming will be even more prevalent than it is now, which is saying a lot because it's already extremely mainstream. also kids are playing run-away-success type of games, which can't just be manufactured with any proven formula, so it's a constant guess as to what will become the next Angry Birds or Minecraft, either way the tablet/smartphone ecosystem seems to be getting more complex with online gaming and features, so i only think kids will become that much more invested into whatever smartphones/tablets have to offer.

And this. Handheld's market will be dead soon enough and there's no way Nintendo can compete with Apple, Samsung and all the others in the smartphone hardware business.

I never thought I would say this one day, but I think it's time (in some years) for Nintendo to move on the smartphone market by releasing their IPs on Apple Store/Google Play. Most of the games are utter shit right now anyways, so it would be good timing to lead with quality there. They could release some gaming devices too.

And Wii U never had a direction or a specific audience. I'm not even sure Nintendo really know what they're doing.
 

KoopaTheCasual

Junior Member
With how parents can be paranoic, you could probably sell this idea hard with correct marketing.
Exactly. I'm not even a father yet, and I can feel my paranoid tendencies kick in with the thought of my child with an iphone. A kid-friendly alternative (that's fully gaming compatible) would go a long way of making me feel like a caring parent, both in terms of security and keeping him as up-to date as possible.

The only problem, if we, on a small video gaming forum have already arrived at this conclusion, you can bet your ass that a company like Samsung is already heavily researching this, with prototypes likely already being developed.
 

cyberheater

PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 Xbone PS4 PS4
They made a great effort to lure non gamers into playing games with the Wii. I think they must have thought that they would all become regular gamers feom that point on and faithfull to Nintendo. But most of them played Wii sports, a karaoke game and two levels of a Mario game and they went back to watching reallife soaps. Also,... They did 't exactly market this thing right. I even see young gaming people not knowing what the WiiU exactly is. And some gphaven't even heard from it.

It was great idea of Nintendo to appeal directly to the most unloyal demography on the planet. Good going Nintendo.
 

AniHawk

Member
Wii U is such a mess, too much emphasis on the expensive controller to a point where it affected the actual consoles specs and now they can't even lower the price otherwise they'll be making an even bigger loss on it. If they wanted to create a filler console they should have just made another Gamecube which was powerful and cheap, the the Wii U is expensive and weak.

part of the wii u's expenses were also its backwards compatability, which does make some degree of sense, coming off the wii. also, the gamecube was inexpensive partially due to nintendo sitting on tech for a year. it was a 2000 system in 2001 (versus something like the xbox which was a 2001 system in 2001).

but generally i agree. the gamepad was a wholly unnecessary addition to console gaming and while there's probably a small market out there that is interested in using their own touch devices with console games (vita, smartglass), it was a really dumb idea to build an entire system around.

It was great idea of Nintendo to appeal directly to the most unloyal demography on the planet. Good going Nintendo.

well that's not true. they appealed directly to mostly no demographic.
 
they won't have the software or hardware ready. the new nintendo console is late 2016 at the earliest, with stuff like zelda, smt x fe, and fatal frame probably to fill in the release schedule between 2015 and then.
They should be working furiously to move all that software to the new platform. There is no advantage to releasing it on the WiiU
 

Elios83

Member
Nintendo is in a tricky spot, do they come out with something to compete against Sony and MS, a $350-$400 next gen console or go the cheap route, I say they compete, they need to go in harder then ever, get a next gen console out there, get the third party support w/ their great Nintendo games and market the shit out of it.

Nintendo can't compete in the traditional home consoles business.
They either bet the whole farm on a casual gimmick resonating well with casuals and taking off like happened with Wii or they will end up like the GC or Wii U. That is too risky.
Third party support is a major issue for them, the fact they didn't invest at the right time in online gaming and developing online services is an other huge thing that is biting them back.
Losing time and resources developing an other traditional home console would be an other major mistake due to stubborness and pride.
 

Majukun

Member
They're losing this gen because they were too unfriendly to the markets that were receptive to them last-gen. They have never been as friendly to PlayStation/Xbox gamers as people want them to be, so I don't see why being behind now would hurt them any more than it ever has. But there was a definite shift toward their GameCube-like methodologies this gen, which were the closest Nintendo has ever been to the PlayStation/Xbox.

they actually were too friendly towards a market (the non-gamers) who was already gone.
didn't you heard the interview of that developer talking about that time when the nintendo rep. came to their studio to present them the wii u?
all of that presentation was focused on how small,low power consuming the console was and how moms would have loved to have it in their living room.

Iwata was focused exactly on the same demographic the wii harvested,but what he didn't understand was that the wii U was basically a wii without what made the wii successfull..the gamepad is not an innovation because nowadays everyone and their grandma have a tablet or a smartphone in their houses,so the pad didn't spark any interest..also most of the non-gamer crowd migrated on smartphone and tablets playing free to play games.
What they should have done was trying to appeal to the gamer crowd,proposing a powerful hardware and a good third party line up,even better if with some exclusives from third party studios.they had the time advantage,and usually it works pretty well.

maybe they wouldn't have won the gen,but they would have got better numbers to show then what they have now.
 

Snaku

Banned
I knew I was going to regret getting a Wii U. Guess I'll just get the most out of the great games as I can and move on.

They're never going to reach that 3.6M forecast this year either. Not without a $50 firesale like the Dreamcast did.
 

Exokell

Banned
why haven't Nintendo pulled the plug with Wiiu? its doing horrible in hardware sales and software sales will always be low due to install base. Whats the point?
 

D.Lo

Member
They lost this generation because they don't have a this-generation system.
Last gen hardware got them record sales with the Wii.

Wii U is such a mess, too much emphasis on the expensive controller to a point where it affected the actual consoles specs and now they can't even lower the price otherwise they'll be making an even bigger loss on it. If they wanted to create a filler console they should have just made another Gamecube which was powerful and cheap, the the Wii U is expensive and weak.
Yep.

It's truly insane that they didn't release something called 'Wii 2' with an upgraded Wii-mote and PS3.5 level power for $250 with Wii Sports 2 bundled in. That's what the SNES was - a NES 2 with so-so specs (compared to arcades and PCs) and an upgraded controller.
 

AniHawk

Member
why haven't Nintendo pulled the plug with Wiiu? its doing horrible in hardware sales and software sales will always be low due to install base. Whats the point?

because selling what they have in the works and in stock is less expensive than not releasing it at all.
 
Well, it's nice to see that they're not putting up a bullshit WiiU projection to act brave this time. Not that they had any room to after selling less in the full year than they did at the console's launch.

I highly, highly doubt they'll hit those 3DS numbers, though, unless they have another price cut and/or revision on hand. And even that might not be enough considering how they can't match 2013's output two years in a row.

Which basically describes most recent Nintendo Consoles.

Same can be said about the 3DS. If you compare it to the Vita it has dated hardware, slow interface and relies on a gimmick 3D effect that most users seem to dislike.

But it has awesome software which makes it a nice console

Now that I own both, I fully agree with this assessment. The 3DS's software support and SD card usage + the Vita's hardware and features would make for an absolutely incredibly handheld. Both are plenty enjoyable on their own, mind you.
 
I knew I was going to regret getting a Wii U. Guess I'll just get the most out of the great games as I can and move on.

They're never going to reach that 3.6M forecast this year either. Not without a $50 firesale like the Dreamcast did.

Yeah me too. :( The games are just not fun anymore and half of the lineup just vanished after these numbers. Such a dissapointment.
 
Nintendo can't compete in the traditional home consoles business.
They either bet the whole farm on a casual gimmick resonating well with casuals and taking off like happened with Wii or they will end up like the GC or Wii U. That is too risky.
Third party support is a major issue for them, the fact they didn't invest at the right time in online gaming and developing online services is an other huge thing that is biting them back.
Losing time and resources developing on other traditional home console would be an other major mistake due to stubborness and pride.
Both routes are extremely risky IMO. Like you said they have no guarantee that the current gen market will accept them, specially if they get in the race what, two years in by the time this thing would reach the market? For the shot of either maybe getting nice sales or crashing and burning like the Wii U?

Meanwhile the casual gimmick could also work, but what if the casuals that left after the Wii don't come back? They're left in basically the same situation.

So yeah, it doesn't look good console-wise.

Last gen hardware got them record sales with the Wii.
The Wii wasn't counting on people that cared for hardware.
 

tuffy

Member
They made a great effort to lure non gamers into playing games with the Wii. I think they must have thought that they would all become regular gamers feom that point on and faithfull to Nintendo. But most of them played Wii sports, a karaoke game and two levels of a Mario game and they went back to watching reallife soaps. Also,... They did 't exactly market this thing right. I even see young gaming people not knowing what the WiiU exactly is. And some gphaven't even heard from it.
Judging by the attach rate, a lot of different people bought a lot of Wii software over the course of its lifespan. So someone buying it for Wii Sports and then shoving it in a closet was the exception rather than the rule.

But releasing a successor that's $100 more expensive at launch torpedoes that mainstream appeal right out of the gate.
 
why haven't Nintendo pulled the plug with Wiiu? its doing horrible in hardware sales and software sales will always be low due to install base. Whats the point?

I think they must have pulled the plug on manufacturing, does anyone know if they would be forced to announce that? I know they did with the GC.
 

Kintaro

Worships the porcelain goddess
You know, it's weird. I'm not even worried about Nintendo. It's the same feeling I had in the past when everyone screamed at the top of their lungs "PC gaming is dead!" I just nod my head and keep playing knowing that unless I'm punched in the face with the official announcement from Nintendo about Nintendo's death, they will always bounce back and find a way.
 
Last gen hardware got them record sales with the Wii.

Yep.

It's truly insane that they didn't release something called 'Wii 2' with an upgraded Wii-mote and PS3.5 level power for $250 with Wii Sports 2 bundled in. That's what the SNES was - a NES 2 with so-so specs (compared to arcades and PCs) and an upgraded controller.

Honestly I thought the Set Top Box(Apple TV, Roku, Ouya, FireTV) option would have been cool for Nintendo.

Make simple Just for games Nintendo Hardware capable of running HD Nintendo games but in a much smaller and cheaper form

Focus on eShop content and Virtual Console. Support everything that came before.

I dunno.
 
The way some people carry on in this forum, its as if they want 3 me too gaming boxes with the same me too games and features. I for one love that Nintendo march to their own beat. Their software is top notch, well crafted and made with care. The day that I can only choose to play fucking COD, FIFA and GTA clones is the day I stop gaming. Yes, that's a bit hyperbolic but I feel that the industry needs a third player with its own ideas.

Let's brush aside the asinine remarks regarding the COD/GTA/FIFA software.

Let's say that a major player in another industry tries to pull what Nintendo is attempting...

Like Samsung/HTC releasing their next device that is just a slightly overclocked Galaxy S2, lacks an app store and only has a rear facing camera in the year 2015. But the Samsung apps for it are the best in their class and they're breaking away from the trend/competition. How well do you think this device will do?

What if Ford releases their next Fusion with a 1.5L 4 cylinder engine, lacks ABS, traction control, but the ride is super smooth and the interior is super quiet. How well do you think this car will do against the Camry, Accord, Altima?
 

ec0ec0

Member
It doesnt make sense how much market share and money they have lost/spent since 2010 or so... i still cant believe it (i am still thinking about it haha). Every kid knew what nintendo was back then.
 
why haven't Nintendo pulled the plug with Wiiu? its doing horrible in hardware sales and software sales will always be low due to install base. Whats the point?
The console is done, but since there are still consoles in the market might as well clench your buttcheeks and ride it out.

Plus my guess is that they'd lose way more money by just abandoning the market without something to fill the gap.
 
8BIr9Tj.png

This seems far too low, especially for a game that was a pack in.

Wow, 2006 fucking sucked.

People seem to forget how bad the Gamecube started bombing. Sure it did fine in the beginning but like the PSP it was limping toward the finish line at the end. This is why Nintendo even did the Wii and blue ocean stuff. The traditional console gaming market of 12-25 year olds abandoned them for edgier games.
 

Sid

Member
Even if they make a current gen console what is the guarantee that 3rd parties would support it or the people playing primarily on PS and Xbox would buy it if they didn't care till date?
 

Stronty

Member
There are a few ways to bring an NES 2 to market extremely quickly:

1. New Housing for the Wii U, most casuals won't know it is a repackage. Good way to make sure Wii U at least breaks even by end of life.

2. PS4 is the new NES 2, Sony might want help to solidify their current lead. Letting Nintendo sell a PS4 in a Nes 2 shell would bring in many lapsed gamers or those that sat out for Wii U.
 
Judging by the attach rate, a lot of different people bought a lot of Wii software over the course of its lifespan. So someone buying it for Wii Sports and then shoving it in a closet was the exception rather than the rule.

But releasing a successor that's $100 more expensive at launch torpedoes that mainstream appeal right out of the gate.
They might have bought more games for the kids. But i think the moms and dads didn't play much more.
But yes. A way more powerful sucessor with a wiimote plus or a procontroller for 100$ less would have been better i think.
 

Somnid

Member
why haven't Nintendo pulled the plug with Wiiu? its doing horrible in hardware sales and software sales will always be low due to install base. Whats the point?

Okay so Nintendo stops selling it and cancels in development software and/or starts an expensive process to port capable projects to 3DS. This is your scenario. How is the bottom line impacted with less software and less chance to get return on investments as well as additional investment to transition? Do you expect that they pull a new console out of the ether and expect it will be a success out the gate? What's the point to destroying a flagship product if you are essentially going to do nothing instead?
 
The console is done, but since there are still consoles in the market might as well clench your buttcheeks and ride it out.

Plus my guess is that they'd lose way more money by just abandoning the market without something to fill the gap.

If their attach rate is so high, why not sell the existing stock at cost?
 
Even if they make a current gen console what is the guarantee that 3rd parties would support it or the people playing primarily on PS and Xbox would buy it if they didn't care till date?
None, but the expectation is that if said console had similar specs and architecture to the others, it would get multiplats by default because publishers would port their game to toasters if they could.
 
Top Bottom