• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Nintendo full year financial results [23.2B yen loss, 3.6M Wii U/12M 3DS forecast]

OmegaFax

Member
Does Nintendo ever post its revenue/profits in terms of the other organizations it owns?
I'm specifically talking the Seattle Mariners. I'd be interested to see how much money they make/lose of the ball club and how much the team would theoretically sell for on the open market.

Wouldn't that be reported as part of Nintendo's other non-operating expenses? If the Mariners themselves are private, probably can't get an exact breakdown of their balance sheet.
 

Opiate

Member
If? They've missed their numbers something like 5 years in a row. If the man hasn't convinced you yet that he has no understanding of the true scope of the problem, then he never will.

I agree completely. Iwata seems to think the problem is at the margins, when this is clearly a failing of core competency.
 
And yes they do have 50 years in which they will likely release between 10-30 different hardware platforms. A single platform in the Wii U is not a big deal. Why ruin the reputation of all those platforms by panicking for a couple of years about one platform?

One of the more delusional things I've read in defense of Nintendo and that's saying something.
Specs are not a cure-all.

Specs won't address Nintendo's dated online infrastructure, their terrible third-party relations, their poor brand perception with core gamers, or their complete lack of Western-targeted first-party development. Nintendo could come out with a system three times as powerful as PS4, and unless they could address those things (spoiler: they can't in just a few years), it'd only be marginally more attractive to the core market than Wii U is.

Right. If Nintendo is ever going to relevant in the console sector again (and I'm honestly not sure they ever will be), it will be a long time before it happens. Even assuming they magically find some gimmick that the current tech industry will not replicate and do better in 6 months, they will keep running into the same problems.
 

Effer

Member
3.6million is still an unrealistic estimate.

That price estimate may take into account a $50 price drop towards the end of the year. Now if they combine that price drop with the $50 off sale we saw on bundles for Christmas 2013, I can see that moving some consoles. $199 is a good deal.
 
The previous two games in those franchises sold more than 10 and 30 million units respectively. You'd think that these new titles would move more than 3.6 million consoles, at least I hope so...

If not, then the Wii U is well and truly dead. =/

Wasn't New Super Mario Bros. Wii one of the biggest sellers on the Wii? That didn't do much to sell systems. I wouldn't get my hopes up on Smash or Kart.
 

Blackage

Member
The previous two games in those franchises sold more than 10 and 30 million units respectively. You'd think that these new titles would move more than 3.6 million consoles, at least I hope so...

If not, then the Wii U is well and truly dead. =/

Guess that depends on if they're system sells or, if they sold because the Wii had a stupidly large base hungry for anything decent.
 

AJSousuke

Member
Specs are not a cure-all.

Specs won't address Nintendo's dated online infrastructure, their terrible third-party relations, their poor brand perception with core gamers, or their complete lack of Western-targeted first-party development. Nintendo could come out with a system three times as powerful as PS4, and unless they could address those things (spoiler: they can't in just a few years), it'd only be marginally more attractive to the core market than Wii U is.

Yes but most of those things could have been improved without the need to launch a new machine. Their third-party relations are bad in part because the hardware can't run the new games as easy as PS4/XO
 
3.6million is still an unrealistic estimate.

Maybe I'm over optimistic about this holiday (and I haven't been optimistic about anything Wii U related for a while, but I imagine they can ship half of that to Japan and the US during Q3 this year. With some channel stuffing somewhere, I would think they would be able to get close. Of course I think 3 million is a more reasonable estimate.
 
So has I eat a had his briefing yet?

Nintendo Q4 Investor Presentation + Q&A

05/07/14 / 09:00 PM EDT

t1399510800z1.png



Nintendo E3 Digital Event

06/10/14 / 12:00 PM EDT

t1402416000z1.png



Iwata's Potential Election to the Board of Directors

Friday, June 27th, 2014
 
The previous two games in those franchises sold more than 10 and 30 million units respectively. You'd think that these new titles would move more than 3.6 million consoles, at least I hope so...

If not, then the Wii U is well and truly dead. =/

The sequels to New Super Mario Bros and 3D Mario World/Galaxy were also on the Wii. Sometimes, franchise history isn't enough.

I do agree that Mario Kart is the biggest release on the Wii U so far, but I'm not sure if that's internet/GAF hype getting to me or genuine feelings
 
3.6million is still an unrealistic estimate.

3.6 million at least seems like an aggressive goal to work towards. I'm not saying he will, because "goals" and "aggression" aren't things I've come to associate with Iwata, but in general terms setting a target a little bit above your expected outcome to take a forward stance on your fiscal year plans isn't out of the question.

It's not the sort of purely delusional targets he was setting last year.
 
I do agree that Mario Kart is the biggest release on the Wii U so far, but I'm not sure if that's internet/GAF hype getting to me or genuine feelings

It's the first big Nintendo title showing a generational leap, so unlike the previous Mario cash-ins, even casuals are gonna understand the differences/advantages of having MK8 over the Wii game. MK will cause the most systems sold, but who knows how many, it's just one title after all.

Not sure what Smash is supposed to do, since it's gonna be another title devalued by 3DS/Wii equivalents featuring identical experiences most people are gonna be content with for several years, instead of spending 300 bucks on a version with minor HD polish.
 

thefro

Member
The sequels to New Super Mario Bros and 3D Mario World/Galaxy were also on the Wii. Sometimes, franchise history isn't enough.

I do agree that Mario Kart is the biggest release on the Wii U so far, but I'm not sure if that's internet/GAF hype getting to me or genuine feelings

1) Mario Kart Wii sold 35 million+ copies
2) Mario Kart as a franchise has consistently moved hardware and sold pretty strongly for Nintendo (even in the Gamecube days)
3) Mario Kart 8's praised as a good looking game and seems to be the best-looking first party title on the system.
4) The release dates have been pretty consistent so it's not nostaligia-based sales like with New Super Mario Brothers.
 
Yes but most of those things could have been improved without the need to launch a new machine. Their third-party relations are bad in part because the hardware can't run the new games as easy as PS4/XO

It would help somewhat, but Nintendo's demonstrated lack of interest in doing anything to cultivate an audience for third-party core games on their consoles is a much bigger hurdle IMO. They haven't even tried since Geist, and that was nine years ago.
 
1) Mario Kart Wii sold 35 million+ copies
2) Mario Kart as a franchise has consistently moved hardware and sold pretty strongly for Nintendo (even in the Gamecube days)
3) Mario Kart 8's praised as a good looking game and seems to be the best-looking first party title on the system.
4) The release dates have been pretty consistent so it's not nostaligia-based sales like with New Super Mario Brothers.

Super Mario 3D World is from a franchise (3D Mario) that's sold quite well, consistently, and was praised even by many major media outlets as the best game released during its window at the very least, if not the best game of the year.

At some point you just stop banging the drum.
 
It's the first big Nintendo title showing a generational leap, so unlike the previous Mario cash-ins, even casuals are gonna understand the differences/advantages of having MK8 over the Wii game. MK will cause the most systems sold, but who knows how many, it's just one title after all.
Really think so? I don't see that at all. If anything, I see MK as one of those titles (of the recent ones anyway) where visuals have reached a point where they can get better but it doesn't really matter given the art style.
 
Wuzzat?
I guess that's in addition to his other jobs?

Iwata is Chairman of the Board of Directors. That's where the center of his power is located.

Shareholders have to elect Mr. Iwata every year to that position because he's not royalty / Nintendo is a public company.

So on that date, we will see if the various appeasements Iwata has made to please investors (stock buyback, paycut, continuing to offer dividends) will be sufficient to keep him in power for another year.

If he doesn't get elected to the Board of Directors, he can still remain as CEO, but it would be very clear that Iwata is no longer welcome by the shareholders to run Nintendo...and the Board is supposed to act in the best wishes of their shareholders.
 
Super Mario 3D World is from a franchise (3D Mario) that's sold quite well, consistently, and was praised even by many major media outlets as the best game released during its window at the very least, if not the best game of the year.

At some point you just stop banging the drum.

I highlighted the important part.
 
Iwata is Chairman of the Board of Directors. That's where the center of his power is located.

Shareholders have to elect Mr. Iwata every year to that position because he's not royalty / Nintendo is a public company.

So on that date, we will see if the various appeasements Iwata has made to please investors (stock buyback, paycut, continuing to offer dividends) will be sufficient to keep him in power for another year.

If he doesn't get elected to the Board of Directors, he can still remain as CEO, but it would be very clear that Iwata is no longer welcome by the shareholders to run Nintendo...and the Board is supposed to act in the best wishes of their shareholders.

Is he? I thought it was the old CEO of NoA before Iwata took over. Source please?
 

Amir0x

Banned
What? There's an election? If I was Iwata I'd be packing up right now.

They have a vote of confidence, but he doesn't have to be removed or not if the shareholders don't vote for him.

I think he'll still barely squeak out over 50% though. They'll give him a year or two more to see the unveiling of the QoL products and the last attempt at reviving Wii U.
 

Lunar15

Member
Tonight's meeting:

Iwata: Hey, those sales numbers, huh? *whistles*

*crickets*

Iwata: But hey look, we just announced a new pokemon for the year. What a coincidence! Now I can factor it into our Fiscal Year 14 projections. What a lucky chance that was!
 
The fact that they didn't shit-can him on the spot for his irresponsible and potentially unethical behavior months back makes me doubt they're going to remove him now. He hasn't done much since then to raise the ire of investors. (Granted, inaction itself could be a reason to oust him, but it seems like he gets a stay of execution on that for as long as the QoL platform remains in the Mystery Box.)
 

Sandfox

Member
The fact that they didn't shit-can him on the spot for his irresponsible and potentially unethical behavior months back makes me doubt they're going to remove him now. He hasn't done much since then to raise the ire of investors. (Granted, inaction itself could be a reason to oust him, but it seems like he gets a stay of execution on that for as long as the QoL platform remains in the Mystery Box.)

Unethical?
 

10k

Banned
The fact that they didn't shit-can him on the spot for his irresponsible and potentially unethical behavior months back makes me doubt they're going to remove him now. He hasn't done much since then to raise the ire of investors. (Granted, inaction itself could be a reason to oust him, but it seems like he gets a stay of execution on that for as long as the QoL platform remains in the Mystery Box.)
oh please that QOL thing is gonna flop harder then a manatee falling from a skyscraper and you know as well as I Nintendo doesn't know how to execute launches of any type successfully.
 

B.O.O.M

Member
What? There's an election? If I was Iwata I'd be packing up right now.

Unless of course he already has his faithful companions as the other board members...


anywho this thread has been very entertaining. I'm really curious to see how Nintendo go about handling their E3 direct this year.

in 3 hours+ time we should get some interesting comments from he-understands-us-gamers Iwata as well! Can't wait
 
The fact that they didn't shit-can him on the spot for his irresponsible and potentially unethical behavior months back makes me doubt they're going to remove him now. He hasn't done much since then to raise the ire of investors. (Granted, inaction itself could be a reason to oust him, but it seems like he gets a stay of execution on that for as long as the QoL platform remains in the Mystery Box.)

wat
 
Unethical?

He refused to revise projections in the face of all sane evidence to the contrary, keeping them at a level that he not only knew the company could not meet, but would in fact miss by an enormous margin. He did this despite having multiple opportunities at which projections were expected to be routinely adjusted (ie, two quarterly earnings reports), and continued to maintain the fiction right up until he legally could not do so anymore.

From the stance of business ethics, it's extremely poor behavior to mislead investors to that degree. Especially given that, in hindsight, there was absolutely no reason he should have believed his projections were still attainable.
 

AJSousuke

Member
It would help somewhat, but Nintendo's demonstrated lack of interest in doing anything to cultivate an audience for third-party core games on their consoles is a much bigger hurdle IMO. They haven't even tried since Geist, and that was nine years ago.

Agree, they should have focused more in creating diversity and appealing a bit more to western tastes.
 
They have a vote of confidence, but he doesn't have to be removed or not if the shareholders don't vote for him.

I think he'll still barely squeak out over 50% though. They'll give him a year or two more to see the unveiling of the QoL products and the last attempt at reviving Wii U.

If QoL fails, Nintendo's hole may be too deep to dig out of. I wish I could be confident in Nintendo's vision, but their last 3-4 years have been catastrophic aside from a couple years of 3DS success.
 
Doesn't that depend on how much money they're putting into it?

It does, but I don't see Nintendo going anything but all out on this. In their last investors meeting, QoL was talked up quite a bit, so I imagine a hefty investment will be dropped on this as its going to be an important integral component to connect between their other consoles. This doesn't sound like it will be a half hearted 3rd pillar stab like the DS was because there's too much at stake now.
 

Sandfox

Member
I think the main worry for Nintendo should be the ticking timer on the relevance of Mario and Zelda if kids of today completely ignore Nintendo and go with mobile gaming.

That has more to do with what Nintendo does with their handhelds and consoles and how they license their ips.
 
Top Bottom