I could see this being true as paid DLC. Ubisoft likes money and a lot of people would like to play small scale missions with other characters, kinda like mgs vr missions.
Great, we're back to chasing scraps of paper from AC1. That shit never made an appearance again for a good fucking reason.
Fuck this game.
I guess we're finally getting that AC fighter
October, so I imagine the game is going gold fairly soon.
Not that this is in any way a final build.
https://www.facebook.com/VMCRemoteTesting?fref=ts
Information here, you can still apply but there are already loads of people still waiting to actually get selected.
Unlike some of the people who have signed I actually respect the NDA and try not to ruin it for everyone else.
Yeah, but it feels like something they wouldn't have brought into Unity. What with causing civilians to riot by other means.
People were saying that the level select stuff about playing as all of those different assassins was not true. >.>Because alot of people were saying "Not true!!!!!" to stuff that just got pretty much confirmed true lol
What was the original ending supposed to be?It makes more sense for coin tossing to be in unity, considering people are poor and starving.
Also... I don't understand what this leak is.
Are these playable missions?
Because the Wolf and Washington sounds a lot like what the original ending of AC3 was supposed to be.
People were saying that the level select stuff about playing as all of those different assassins was not true. >.>
EDIT:Lol I just noticed that I have received a tag.
Pretty sure no other endings were planned other than the one we got. Although unfortunately this never made it into the actual game.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6d79JHh3cU
Pretty sure no other endings were planned other than the one we got. Although unfortunately this never made it into the actual game.What was the original ending supposed to be?
What was the original ending supposed to be?
I can see why they would change that. AlthoughConnor was supposed to find out that it was Washington who ordered the burning of Connors village as a child, not the templars. From a former dev post on reddit, apparently the game was supposed to end with you killing Washington. However it was deemed to controversial. So I think thats why they made the tyranny DLC, as some alternate history deal.
Dear ubisoft, do not touch the animation system anymore. It is perfect.
Ship the game like this.
I can see why they would change that. AlthoughThe game has a ton of deleted scenes that I wish were in there. Wouldn't mind a Kenway Trilogy remastered directors cut or something.we do find that out at some point in the game.
You the player finds that out. Connor never does though.
Really? I thought he found it out as well.
Connor finds out in this scene. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pWda-TNg58You the player finds that out. Connor never does though.
Yea, but it looks like its true. The first one (and only selectable) in the level select screen was "The Tragedy of Jacques De Molay" - a member of the knights templar order. And in the video of the Rift - there are templar shields scattered all over the place. So you can connect the dots.
Sure, the other stuff is probably not in the Beta - but it seems way more likely to be a thing in the game now than back when we didnt have this video.
Connor finds out in this scene. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pWda-TNg58
The statements that were called bullshit to were that you would be able to join into different time periods with friends and play as different Assassin's during that time period. All of which were you were fully able to outfit and customize. Quoting the reddit idiot, "You could play as Vaseline <--lol. And also have 4 other friends join you". Sorry, but all of that is bullshit.
Sigh.... of course Connor, the one Assassin I want to play as again, doesn't seem to have a mission. Just his dad it seems.
Sigh.... of course Connor, the one Assassin I want to play as again, doesn't seem to have a mission. Just his dad it seems.
ButHe finds out that Washington ordered an attack on the village at that point because they were aiding the british, not the inital attack when he was a kid.
There are 2 Haytham ones, so one might be a placeholder/mistake and actually be Connor. I thought it was odd that Haytham is the only one with 2 missions.
I'm thinking the wolf and washington is a connor mission, because Connor is the only assassin named after a wolf. Everyone else is named after eagles.
He finds out that Washington ordered an attack on the village at that point because they were aiding the british, not the inital attack when he was a kid.
He finds out that Washington ordered an attack on the village at that point because they were aiding the british, not the inital attack when he was a kid.
You missed out on a very tragic tale with the only assassin we played as so far who never broke the tenets. And also the most fleshed out side characters in the form of homestead missions. Which in retrospect could've been added to the main narrative as a way to alleviate the overly oppressive tone of the campaign.Uhm........you should watch the video
Also this thread is finally helping me understand why AC3 was so bad.
Glad it's the only AC game I've skipped.
Great, we're back to chasing scraps of paper from AC1. That shit never made an appearance again for a good fucking reason.
Fuck this game.
Also this thread is finally helping me understand why AC3 was so bad.
Glad it's the only AC game I've skipped.
He finds out that Washington ordered an attack on the village at that point because they were aiding the british, not the inital attack when he was a kid.
I love you. Everything stated here is exactly why I love AC3.You missed out on a very tragic tale with the only assassin we played as so far who never broke the tenets. And also the most fleshed out side characters in the form of homestead missions. Which in retrospect could've been added to the main narrative as a way to alleviate the overly oppressive tone of the campaign.
So there are females in the game.
I just lost ten bucks.
Read the Get to know Elise thread. Ubisoft never said that there weren't any females in the game.So there are females in the game.
I just lost ten bucks.
I love you. Everything stated here is exactly why I love AC3.
Or his loyalty to his creed and homestead meant more to him than revenge. Shocking how anti-tropey that is, I know.Yeah, it was pretty shit. Fuck Connor.
Heytham: By burning their villages and salting their land. By calling for their extermination, according to this letter. Not the first time either. Tell him what you did fourteen years ago.
Washington: That was another time. The Seven Years War.
And then Connor tells them both to stay away from him. Haytham is clearly referring to Connor's village being burned down 14 year earlier, and Connor clearly gets it. Though he really doesn't seem to mind too much, but that's because he's a shitty character.
It's probably a build that's been created to test certain aspects of the game outside of the studio for a focus group of some kind, this kind of stuff happens more than you'd think, so with that in mind it's probably not the most up-to-date built in terms of optimization and suchThat tearing in the second gif is horrific.
That tearing in the second gif is horrific.
Thanks. A gaffer made it for me a while back. (I forget who, at the moment)That avatar is ballin!
As for this entire thread O__O people are crazy.
I'm still pissed this was replaced by that shitty regal outfit. This is exactly the outfit I envisioned when I first stated my ideas for a American Revolution AC game.I think the Washington and the Wolf one is supposed to be Connor when he is Captain of the Aquila.
Read the Get to know Elise thread. Ubisoft never said that there weren't any females in the game.
Ah I see.I should have clarified. Female playables. Like I'm going to be all "lol why are women in video games?".