Mineshaft_Gap
4077th
Where can I download the newest DSfix? I just wiped everything off my HDD and want to reinstall Dark Souls with DSfix on the steamworks version
Yeah, this has to be some sort of mix up. Namco Bandai can't possibly be that fucking stupid.
Well, they were stupid enough to rename their western branches to Bandai Namco even though their entire western brand recognition rested on Namco.
Imagine if we had Enix-Square instead of Square-Enix when Enix's brand recognition outside of Japan wasn't much more than "Those guys who published Tri-Ace's games."
Mellow greetings, fellow citizen! What appears to be your boggle is time zones.If you aren't a time-traveler, you might want to look at a calendar.
Snip
Mellow greetings, fellow citizen! What appears to be your boggle is time zones.
What the shit. also, dat Tag change. lol
Until this is resolved I guess I'm boycotting Bloodborne and Dark Souls 2. Can't refund my Steam Dark Souls..
What the shit. also, dat Tag change. lol
Until this is resolved I guess I'm boycotting Bloodborne and Dark Souls 2. Can't refund my Steam Dark Souls..
I wouldn't hit Bloodborne over this, Bandai Namco's not involved with that and I wouldn't be surprised if From wasn't involved with this DMCA thing happening. It's like hating a girlfriend/boyfriend of a person you REALLY hate even though they had nothing to do with whatever angered you and may have even broken up.What the shit. also, dat Tag change. lol
Until this is resolved I guess I'm boycotting Bloodborne and Dark Souls 2. Can't refund my Steam Dark Souls..
Well, they were stupid enough to rename their western branches to Bandai Namco even though their entire western brand recognition rested on Namco.
Imagine if we had Enix-Square instead of Square-Enix when Enix's brand recognition outside of Japan wasn't much more than "Those guys who published Tri-Ace's games."
LOL fucking scamco.
I'm not sure what Bandai has to do with Bloodborne? Also that kinda seems premature with what we've learned about the company that struck the copyright claim.
Dark Souls 2 I can understand, but did you miss the memo that Bloodborne is being published by Sony?
I wouldn't hit Bloodborne over this, Bandai Namco's not involved with that and I wouldn't be surprised if From wasn't involved with this DMCA thing happening. It's like hating a girlfriend/boyfriend of a person you REALLY hate even though they had nothing to do with whatever angered you and may have even broken up.
What the shit. also, dat Tag change. lol
Until this is resolved I guess I'm boycotting Bloodborne and Dark Souls 2. Can't refund my Steam Dark Souls..
Dear Durante,
Please refrain from fixing our games and showcasing our incompetence to the world.
Thanks,
Bamco
This might be a new low for Bamco, have some respect when fans invest their own time to fix your shortcomings you fools, damn.
If Namco wanted to go all out with this, they would have done it a long time ago, not two years later. I think it's just the company's Germany branch that has made a mistake. Or there might have been a mixup because there's clearly no case here as far as any infringements go.
Just wait for a company response (and that's if they care enough to give a response) before jumping to conclusions. Or as the Dropbox message suggests, counter that DMCA notice through the form Dropbox provided and identify that it's a mistake on Namco Germany's part. Not much else to say there. Mistakes happen.
lol @ people overreacting and displaying all this vitriol.
That's how things work now. There was an uproar regarding Youtube's policies a while back, too.It's a bummer that companies can just say "I don't like that file" and they shut down someone's dropbox over it. Dropbox doesn't even investigate, just block now, check later?
Christmas is Thursday; at the time I made that post, the latest it was anywhere on Earth was 5:12 PM on Tuesday. Heck, it's still more than 3 hours before UTC+14 hits Christmas Eve.Mellow greetings, fellow citizen! What appears to be your boggle is time zones.
Geography lesson: the main part of the US stretches across multiple time zones. Many of us regularly communicate with people across those zones, so we are aware of how they work.Come on now. Don't tell people there exists a world outside of the states. You do know that last time anyone mentioned it <insert deity> pressed the reset button.
Where can I download the newest DSfix? I just wiped everything off my HDD and want to reinstall Dark Souls with DSfix on the steamworks version
Dark Souls 2.0.1 patch notes:
- Improved stability
- Now includes Bandai Souls fix (BSFix) developed by our own Burante
Dark Souls 2.0.1 patch notes:
- Improved stability
- Now includes Bandai Souls fix (BSFix) developed by our own Burante
I hope this happens just so Durante can sue the living crap out of them.
I want this to happen just so Durante can sue the shit out of them.
It's a bummer that companies can just say "I don't like that file" and they shut down someone's dropbox over it. Dropbox doesn't even investigate, just block now, check later?
With DMCA stuff, it's never too early.has bandai namco given out an official statement yet? seems a bit early to grab the pitchforks.
All of you people overreacting after Namco has said they'd look into it are amazing.
Its highly probable that someone low in the foodchain over there was tasked with pulling (by sending DMCAs) the debug exes and happened to not know what DSFix was.
It'll get resolved. We'll all carry on.
This is what our corporate overlords have decreed, and thus it was made law by their humble servants in the US-government in the form of the blessed DMCA.
Well, yes, from a user POV it sucks, but from a service provider POV it's a pretty good trade-off; you get to do whatever you want, don't need to take any real affirmative effort to block infringing files, but as long as you react somewhat efficiently you have no liability. You can even make money from infringing content in the mean time.
If I'm Dropbox, I absolutely prefer the DMCA to a system where I have to make judgment calls that could leave me liable.
The real loophole in the system is not service providers honouring takedowns, but the fact that there's no penalty at all if a user does a successful counter-takedown, so there' s no incentive for content providers not to takedown virtually everything that isn't on its face abusive. If third party content protection companies faced legal liability for issuing frivolous takedown notices (say, they could be billed $50 per failed notice as a penalty for abuse of process) the entire system would stop in its tracks. Alas...