http://neogaf.com/showthread.php?t=935809&page=1Still showing "File not found"
Try that, sorry on mobile
http://neogaf.com/showthread.php?t=935809&page=1Still showing "File not found"
Nope, still same error. No worries though...
It means we are saying its dead not in a literally meaning in the sense that it has been discontinued or selling 0 copy, but more of a metaphorical way in how everyone except the vita fans has moved on and its fate already sealed.
Internal memory is disabled when you use a card.
Are the screens on both the 100 and 2000 Vita the same size?
Can I use a screen protector for the 1000 on a 2000?
I dont think that would work with the way things are setup now, the PS4 recognizes the Vita as an actual controller that is signed into your acct and i dont think there is a way to have just a "screen mode" or have the vita accept ds4 commands. They could possibly do it where you have the ds4 communicating directly with ps4 with vita strictly as a screen, but youd need to be in the same area as the ps4.
also i wrote a bit about how to save the Vita, which basically ends up being a way to save the games on vita instead of the hardware itself. Here it is, for the curious http://www.neogaf.com/showthread.php?t=935809
As a Vita owner, I think the handheld serves as a good example of the fact that specs and proprietary storage cards don't make a good console. Let Sony learn a lesson.
Whenever these discussions come up, while I agree that the PSP had a wealth of support from major developers that just isn't there on Vita, I feel that the Vita gets no credit for the decent range of downloadable stuff on it. Frozen Synapse, Spelunky, Soldner X, Rogue Legacy, Hotline Miami, Guacamelee, The Swapper, Walking Dead, Terraria, etc etc. It allows western developers to release stuff for it, I can't wait to play Banner Saga for example.
Considering that it also plays the PSP and PSOne digital range, while it's own exclusive library is lacking as a successor, it does allow you to tailor a really nice collection to play on the move.
All the regular complaints (poor exclusive library compared to PSP, memory cards, lack of AAA support) are perfectly valid, but they don't stop it being a great portable gaming system with a large range of compatible games unless you only care for what is new and what is exclusive.
How much different do you think the Vita's life would be if it was simply named PSP2? Average consumer doesn't seem to know what the PS Vita is. They all know what a PSP is.
I feel like if they called it PSP2 a lot more people would have (initially) responded to it.
How much different do you think the Vita's life would be if it was simply named PSP2? Average consumer doesn't seem to know what the PS Vita is. They all know what a PSP is.
I feel like if they called it PSP2 a lot more people would have (initially) responded to it.
None, the Name is fine.
The Vitas Problem are:
- hidden costs (Memory Cards)
- lack of advertising
- way too specific Libary (If you don't like japanese Games with Anime-Style you don't need a Vita)
Those three things broke the Vitas neck in the long run. There may be more, but in my eyes those three are the Main offenders
I think a name only does so much...
I think the bigger offender is that the casual handheld gaming market (especially kids) is dead thanks to mobile. These made up a lot of the DS and PSP's userbase and both have seen huge declines in the successors for this reason.
How much different do you think the Vita's life would be if it was simply named PSP2?