• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Does too much fanservice in games bother you?

george_us

Member
Depends on the kind of fanservice. If it's super cheesecake like Bayonetta, R.Mika from Street Fighter 5, or some of the Dragon's Crown ladies then not at all. That shit is hysterical to me. I revel in the ridiculousness of it all.
 

Cloyster

Banned
I don't think it's very clear that the character is supposed to look cute instead of sexy. She looks like this:

13993734609_a795fb2caf.jpg

Gonna have to REALLY disagree with you there.
 

Cornbread78

Member
Oh wow, just cruised through some of the pages in here. Pretty intense debate going on. So Does my avi qualify me for a fan service crazed animu weebo also?

How about this, I'll fess up right away. I don't mind it at all if it is in reference to adult characters. There is no reason to sexual children in video games and I'm stumped trying to remember a game where it was prevalent.
 

Ramenman

Member
what bothers me is when people act like "fanservice's" sole meaning is "showing boobs and butts of girl characters".

it's fanservice when it services the fans. When I see Gumshoe's first meeting with Miles Edgeworth, that's fan service. And no-one is naked.
 
The point I am trying to make (and am clearly failing at) is that there is no "East vs West" mentality here. Everyone knows what a "sexual" costume looks like. Everyone knows what a sexy dance looks like.

I'm not on the "outfit is completely nonsexual" thing now that I look at it but linking to things that are EXPLICITLY sexual is a little misleading. There's an obvious difference between Rise's Outfit and a leotard with sheer tights, especially when combined with that sort of a dance.

I dunno an expose midriff or low cut top is sexy sure, but that's just kind of typical sexy clothing I guess. It's just not that outrageous given the context of the game to me.

Gonna have to REALLY disagree with you there.


Yeah that's a definite reach. Lolipop chainsaw is definitely a game made to be super fanservicey and Rise's outfit isn't even close to what Jessica Nigri is wearing.

Well hold on a second.

We have bikni top with unbuttoned top over it, exposed midriff, short skirt, thigh highs, and high heels. I don't think it's that different from the outfit Nigri is wearing. I think there's an aspect of giving visual interest to the outfit from a drawing perspective but to say it's non-sexual is a little much.
 
Oh wow, just cruised through some of the pages in here. Pretty intense debate going on. So Does my avi qualify me for a fan service crazed animu weebo also?

How about this, I'll fess up right away. I don't mind it at all if it is in reference to adult characters. However, I like the loli's dressed like the one in my avi.; she is the best loli in anime ever. There is no reason to sexual children in video games and I'm stumped trying to remember a game where it was prevalent.

I will warn you that loli is usually used in a derogatory manner here, so even though you used it in a more appropriate manner, I'm not sure if that is the right choice of words.

Edit: Cheerleaders are not idols.
 

wyrdwad

XSEED Localization Specialist
what bothers me is when people act like "fanservice's" sole meaning is "showing boobs and butts of girl characters".

I don't think anyone really is. This topic, however, clearly isn't about that type of fanservice -- it's about the more common definition among Japanese games.

-Tom
 

kevm3

Member
Depends on what kind. If it's creating games with nothing but characters that look like 15 year old girls, then yes, it's absolutely a problem. It's one of the reasons I avoid a lot of modern Japanese games.
 

PSqueak

Banned
Avoided playing skull girls for a really long ass time because of fanservice, people kept telling me it was a solid fighting game eventually bought it and enjoy it (it was dirt cheap on a steam sale), but i dislike strongly most of the cast, Valentine is the worst offender.

Still to this day refuse to play Bayonetta because of bayo's design.

It's not a moral crusade, i just don't like games getting this blatant.
 

wyrdwad

XSEED Localization Specialist
how about if I put these 2 images next to each other, you really think they aren't similar?

Not even remotely. I'm even more certain they're NOT similar seeing them right next to one another, in fact.

The first is clearly contextualized as a nonsexualized Japanese idol outfit, whereas the second is clearly contextualized as a sexualized Western cheerleader outfit.

Culturally, they are entirely dissimilar. In terms of the amount of skin showing, they are entirely dissimilar (surely you can see that the second image is showing WAY more skin!). And in terms of the intent behind them, they are entirely dissimilar.

I cannot even comprehend comparing the two, honestly.

-Tom
 
-=::[Eagle-Vision]::=-;184828475 said:
I know I'm late to the thread but, what's the problem with a character causing sexual arousal? What's wrong with that?

I'd be curious to see if anyone has a good answer for you.
 
I'm not on the "outfit is completely nonsexual" thing now that I look at it but linking to things that are EXPLICITLY sexual is a little misleading. There's an obvious difference between Rise's Outfit and a leotard with sheer tights, especially when combined with that sort of a dance.

I dunno an expose midriff or low cut top is sexy sure, but that's just kind of typical sexy clothing I guess. It's just not that outrageous given the context of the game to me.

Yes I agree. You also have to remember that all Anita says is that it "is unfortunate" they chose that image. Not that it was filth that should be destroyed. Everyone can see that in advertising a dancing game you will use sexualised images, but attaching one to an attendee badge is rightfully seen as not being in the greatest of tastes.
 

The Technomancer

card-carrying scientician
You know, I wasn't even particularly of the mind that her outfit was sexual or anything, until I saw it from that different angle. The top tied under the exposed bra is kind of damning.
 
Yes I agree. You also have to remember that all Anita says is that it "is unfortunate" they chose that image. Not that it was filth that should be destroyed. Everyone can see that in advertising a dancing game you will use sexualised images, but attaching one to an attendee badge is rightfully seen as not being in the greatest of tastes.

What else could they advertise? Atlus does the badges ever year.
 

wyrdwad

XSEED Localization Specialist
Yes I agree. You also have to remember that all Anita says is that it "is unfortunate" they chose that image. Not that it was filth that should be destroyed. Everyone can see that in advertising a dancing game you will use sexualised images, but attaching one to an attendee badge is rightfully seen as not being in the greatest of tastes.

Which is why they didn't. The image they used is not sexualized in the slightest -- she looks like a dancer. Which is pretty much what she should look like, since it's a dancing game.

Is there any image from Dancing All Night that would've been MORE appropriate? I mean, that just seems like a wholly tame image to me. Nothing unfortunate about it -- it represents the product well.

-Tom
 
Not even remotely. I'm even more certain they're NOT similar seeing them right next to one another, in fact.

The first is clearly contextualized as a nonsexualized Japanese idol outfit, whereas the second is clearly contextualized as a sexualized Western cheerleader outfit.

Culturally, they are entirely dissimilar. In terms of the amount of skin showing, they are entirely dissimilar (surely you can see that the second image is showing WAY more skin!). And in terms of the intent behind them, they are entirely dissimilar.

I cannot even comprehend comparing the two, honestly.

-Tom

Oh come on, the only difference is that Nigri has bare shoulders, she isn't showing way more skin at all. if Rise's costume is supposed to be nonsexualised then why is her top open with her bra exposed?
 

george_us

Member
And if so, that only shows that people don't judge games for stuff like that -- they throw money at them. Just like people throw money at lots of risque things. If we're going to judge by Game of War commercials, then fan service isn't 'holding gaming back', it's expanding the gaming base and making mega-bank in the process.

Again, the niche games people are complaining about are niche games. Even most people who game regularly don't know about them. And to even the people that have heard about them, it's a game name and maybe a cover or a couple screenshots. Big deal.

Meanwhile, 50 Shades of Grey tear up the charts, teenagers posing in bikinis are huge hits on social media, and anybody can dial up hardcore porn in 3 seconds on the internet. Fanservice in games isn't holding gaming back -- it's not even a footnote in the history of gaming.

If you want gaming to be taken seriously as a medium, you don't try to remove the risque - you simply prove that it's a viable medium by putting out masterpieces. That's what happened when Miller's Dark Knight Returns took the critics and mainstream by storm in 1986. And then once the critics eyes were opened, other previous works and newer works were finally ready to be noticed. And now 30 years later, you can't throw a stone without seeing the influence of comics on every other medium -- massive hits like The Walking Dead, etc, etc. Nobody gives two shits if you can also get swimsuit comic books or tentacle porn graphic novels - just like nobody judges Citizen Kane because you can also go rent porn flicks.

Nothing is holding back gaming other than the medium itself - balancing the complexity of interactive storytelling, technological merit, etc. Certainly not boob pixels.
Excellent post.
 

Mik317

Member
Oh come on, the only difference is that Nigri has bare shoulders, she isn't showing way more skin at all. if Rise's costume is supposed to be nonsexualised then why is her top open with her bra exposed?

The difference being that most HS Cheerleading outfits don't look like that wheras most Idol outfits do look like Rise's. So one is super idealized and the other isn't.
 

The Technomancer

card-carrying scientician
The difference being that most HS Cheerleading outfits don't look like that wheras most Idol outfits do look like Rise's. So one is super idealized and the other isn't.

That requires that we buy into the idea that idol outfits like that aren't sexualized though. This feels like its starting to get circular.
 
Not even remotely. I'm even more certain they're NOT similar seeing them right next to one another, in fact.

The first is clearly contextualized as a nonsexualized Japanese idol outfit, whereas the second is clearly contextualized as a sexualized Western cheerleader outfit.
Honestly man I feel like you're going too hard on this. I get the idea but why are there things like idol dakimakura or gravure albums if there's zero sexuality in it?

Yes I agree. You also have to remember that all Anita says is that it "is unfortunate" they chose that image. Not that it was filth that should be destroyed. Everyone can see that in advertising a dancing game you will use sexualised images, but attaching one to an attendee badge is rightfully seen as not being in the greatest of tastes.

It's one of the main characters of the game and it's about her grappling with the Japanese idol world, and they dress that way often. I'll say that it's probably slightly more sexual than a lot of performance outfits (I am not a huge Idol guy so I might be wrong) but I think that's mostly for visual interest, like the zippers on the stockings, that's not to make it latexy or fetishy but just to put something there.

I mean look at the image of Koharu I linked earlier, https://welshjapanotaku.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/koharu.jpg I don't have a huge problem with this outfit. You lose the Bikini top and unbuttoned top on Rise and it's much more standard looking. Put some fake medals on there for visual interest, she's the commander of my heart doki doki fucking whatever.

I dunno, it's a video game character, so it's on the badge for a video game convention. I don't see the problem. One Otakon there was a Dragon Age badge, I had a much bigger problem with that.

You know, I wasn't even particularly of the mind that her outfit was sexual or anything, until I saw it from that different angle. The top tied under the exposed bra is kind of damning.

Bikini Top! It's different. It's obviously worse to be seen in your underwear than your bathing suit.
 

PSqueak

Banned
She's just a walking fashion model sketch in a dominatrix outfit. All her poses are made ridiculous purposefully, you're just really missing out. Least sexual character, Mario gets me more excited.

I work on a really weird scale, for example i have no problem with Lollipop chainsaw because, well, to put it bluntly, everything is stupid in that game, but as in, stupid on purpose, all the blatant sexiness and violence and everything about this game is so ridiculous and handed with comedy and low level satire, it makes it easier to turn off my brain and just have fun.

Bayo is on a weird spot where it's like "we're not trying to be serious about it, but we kinda also are" that makes me feel a bit more critical, and it comes to me as less of a satire or sexual empowerment and more as "sex sells", and it kinda bothers me when i feel pandered to.

Yes, i know Bayo is supposed to be a female power fantasy, but that's not the point of the thread, the thread is asking if fan service specially bothers me and since bayo makes me feel like it's trying to "trick" me into trying it cause "it's sexy,lol", then it bothers me.
 

wyrdwad

XSEED Localization Specialist
Oh come on, the only difference is that Nigri has bare shoulders, she isn't showing way more skin at all. if Rise's costume is supposed to be nonsexualised then why is her top open with her bra exposed?

So having one's top open is inherently sexual, then?

If that's the case, then what about two-piece swimsuits? Are they inherently sexual, since they're basically nothing but underwear?

Having an open top is pretty standard for performers because it helps with air circulation and prevents excess sweating. It's not sexual, it's practical. In much the way a two-piece swimsuit is practical because it allows for greater mobility in the water.

It is we who sexualize these outfits. They themselves are not sexual.

Honestly man I feel like you're going too hard on this. I get the idea but why are there things like idol dakimakura or gravure albums if there's zero sexuality in it?

Because of slimy music producers trying to make a quick buck.

Everything is sexualized for money at some point. But that doesn't mean its intent is to be sexual -- it just means someone MADE it sexual somewhere along the line, because they realized they could appeal to the lowest common denominator for a quick buck.

-Tom
 

Cloyster

Banned
I work on a really weird scale, for example i have no problem with Lollipop chainsaw because, well, to put it bluntly, everything is stupid in that game, but as in, stupid on purpose, all the baltant sexiness and violence and everything about this game is so ridiculous and handed with comedy and low level satire, it makes it easier to turn off my brain and just have fun.

Bayo is on a weird spot where it's like "we're not trying to be serious about it, but we kinda also are" that makes me feel a bit more critical, and it comes to me as less of a satire or sexual empowerment and more as "sex sells", and it kinda bothers me when i feel pandered to.

Yes, i know Bayo is supposed to be a female power fantasy, but that's not the point of the thread, the thread is asking if fan service specially bothers me and since bayo makes me feel like it's trying to "trick" me into trying it cause "it's sexy,lol", then i bothers me.

Let me get this straight. You are okay with Lollipop Chainsaw because it's stupid, and you think Bayonetta is taking itself seriously?
 
The only thing I can think of where fan service bothered me was in Silent Hill Homecoming where
they had to throw in Pyramid Head for know reason at all.
He wasn't even part of the story. But in most cases, it doesn't bother me.
 
Boom. And Teddie's more recognizable and iconic anyway, so yeah.

I guess? Sort of makes it seem like a younger kids game when it's not is all. I mean I guess we could add an animal mascot to every thing ever and just show it off instead of actual designs.

Kero Kero kids you'll love Wizard Barristers

I work on a really weird scale, for example i have no problem with Lollipop chainsaw because, well, to put it bluntly, everything is stupid in that game, but as in, stupid on purpose, all the baltant sexiness and violence and everything about this game is so ridiculous and handed with comedy and low level satire, it makes it easier to turn off my brain and just have fun.

Bayo is on a weird spot where it's like "we're not trying to be serious about it, but we kinda also are" that makes me feel a bit more critical, and it comes to me as less of a satire or sexual empowerment and more as "sex sells", and it kinda bothers me when i feel pandered to.

Yes, i know Bayo is supposed to be a female power fantasy, but that's not the point of the thread, the thread is asking if fan service specially bothers me and since bayo makes me feel like it's trying to "trick" me into trying it cause "it's sexy,lol", then i bothers me.

Fair enough, but I just didn't find Bayonetta sexy at all. Something about her body just put me off.
 

PSqueak

Banned
Let me get this straight. You are okay with Lollipop Chainsaw because it's stupid, and you think Bayonetta is taking itself seriously?

Eh, it's the general gist, but it's more like, Bayoneta is not silly/stupid enough, yes i know bayo is not exactly a "super serial" game.

Like i said, it's a weird scale, it's how one can enjoy really stupid movies cause they are fun, yet be critical of smarter movies for other reasons.
 

Razzorn34

Member
-=::[Eagle-Vision]::=-;184828475 said:
I know I'm late to the thread but, what's the problem with a character causing sexual arousal? What's wrong with that?

This is the real question. I doubt anyone answers you though. It's too real of a question for the people complaining to answer.

Myself? I love it. All fan service does is add another layer to whatever I'm already enjoying. I've never come across any game that would make me think different.
 
So having one's top open is inherently sexual, then?

If that's the case, then what about two-piece swimsuits? Are they inherently sexual, since they're basically nothing but underwear?

Having an open top is pretty standard for performers because it helps with air circulation and prevents excess sweating. It's not sexual, it's practical. In much the way a two-piece swimsuit is practical because it allows for greater mobility in the water.

It is we who sexualize these outfits. They themselves are not sexual.



Because of slimy music producers trying to make a quick buck.

Everything is sexualized for money at some point. But that doesn't mean its intent is to be sexual -- it just means someone MADE it sexual somewhere along the line, because they realized they could appeal to the lowest common denominator for a quick buck.

-Tom

The mental gymnastics are astounding.
 
I guess? Sort of makes it seem like a younger kids game when it's not is all. I mean I guess we could add an animal mascot to every thing ever and just show it off instead of actual designs.
It's Teddie, dude. Come on.

Personally, I'd be for this, but from an advertising standpoint, Atlus seems to use the face of the game. M Bison Teddie was the face of Arena and so they used that for the badge.
Looking back on Atlus's badges they seem to shift between sexy stuff and Teddie so they should have just used the Teddie dancing picture and combine them like we've always wanted.
 

Cloyster

Banned
Eh, it's the general gist, but it's more like, Bayoneta is not silly/stupid enough, yes i know bayo is not exactly a "super serial" game.

Like i said, it's a weird scale, it's how one can enjoy really stupid movies cause they are fun, yet be critical of smarter movies for other reasons.

That said, Bayonetta isn't made to tittilate
 
-=::[Eagle-Vision]::=-;184828475 said:
I know I'm late to the thread but, what's the problem with a character causing sexual arousal? What's wrong with that?

Some people can't act smug when show off their video games to friends and family members when there is anything like the "Am I kawaii ~ ugu" comic strip in the game.

Is just the need to feel that the time and money they have spent is justified. If the medium is childish and juvenile, then is nothing but child's games and time wasters.

And that terrifies a good portion of the 'core' crowd. See: pushing "e-gaming" and trying to make it a "legitime" sport.
 

Moonkid

Member
I'd be curious to see if anyone has a good answer for you.
I can't speak for everyone that looks down upon fanservice, but simplifying it to people having some kind of issue with it because it causes sexual arousal is pretty telling of the miscommunication that goes on often in these threads. It doesn't help that there is constant needless antagonising, and unnecessary callbacks to it, when it can simply be ignored.
 

Mik317

Member
The mental gymnastics are astounding.

come on, Don't drop to shitty insults like this. I don't agree w/ everything he is saying (I am not into Idol stuff or Moe in general so I don't know if he's right or not) but you can at least respect his opinion and not do this shitty arrogant I'm better than you stuff. Its why these threads die...
 

Morrigan Stark

Arrogant Smirk
Oh come on, the only difference is that Nigri has bare shoulders, she isn't showing way more skin at all. if Rise's costume is supposed to be nonsexualised then why is her top open with her bra exposed?
Breasts aren't sexual. They serve to feed babies. It is you who is sexualizing them. Stop being a perv.

xD
 
come on, Don't drop to shitty insults like this. I don't agree w/ everything he is saying (I am not into Idol stuff or Moe in general so I don't know if he's right or not) but you can at least respect his opinion and not do this shitty arrogant I'm better than you stuff. Its why these threads die...

I don't think calling it "mental gymnastics" is without merit. Especially in regards to the chasteness point.

Though his points about the outfit being for extended dancing is a good one,(oh or maybe not given that we have a dancer here) and why would you think that's underwear she's an Idol not a stripper!

Everything is sexualized for money at some point. But that doesn't mean its intent is to be sexual -- it just means someone MADE it sexual somewhere along the line, because they realized they could appeal to the lowest common denominator for a quick buck.

Okay but that's still part of the process. Rise has photobooks too I'm sure. Part of being an idol is photobooks, it's part of the culture. So it's a bit to say "well my idealized view of idols are not sexualized" well sure, fine, but in reality photo books exist. I'm a fan of Dempa Gumi Inc. and as far as I've heard they leave it up to individual choice if they do photo sets like that and I think only really Moga does because she was a Gravure Model before the group.
 

mankoto

Member
Fanservice (or violence or that matter) has yet to put me off I enjoyed or was the reason why I didn't like said thing. I'm very indifferent about it. If a piece of media is good, then it's good. If it isn't, well, that's too bad. If fanservice adds something, cool. If it doesn't, then it's whatever, I just don't mind it either way. Although because everyone has different values and opinions, I do understand why it's a problem for some people. I prefer to watch anime, play games, etc. alone and if someone were to come in while I was playing or watching something that had content in it they didn't like, I'd eventually go play or watch something else soon after that person came in out of respect for that person. Of course, if they don't mind or aren't put off by it, then nothing changes.

From my perspective, it's impossible to get rid of sex in media. You can hide it or want it to go away all you want, but it certainly won't go away anytime soon. The way to go about it is to balance it out. Meaning more female characters in appropriate contextualized attire and more male protagonists in mainstream games made with female gaze in mind this way everyone has their own share of fun and what not.


Serious question to those who like fanservice and wants it in all their games: do you play games alone or with other people present? And if it's the latter, what is the reaction between you and others?

It depends really. If my friends are over then it won't really matter what's played. Although yes, I do like to play games by myself as it helps me bring me into the game's world a bit more versus hearing chatter in the background. In some cases, yes a couple of my friends and I have played the multiplayer of Senran Kagura Shinovi Versus together. We played it like any other game we played together. Nothing was any different than if we play anything else. Although if anything, if it's a new game, we might joke about the physics if it's all over the place like SK or DOA.

And how do you feel about playing a game with lingering panty shots, voyeuristic shower scenes, and tits out the wazoo in the company of others? Is it comparable to watching porn with other people or what? Just trying to understand where people are coming from. Genuinely curious and not judging
If the people I'm hanging out with are fine with it sure. But as I live with 2 younger sisters (13 and 6) I can't bring myself to show anything with fanservice or even violence (like stabs or blood flying) around them. I keep it PG rated. I'm just very mindful around my personal surroundings and who I'm with. I have two friends that are against T&A in media and just talking about it drives him up a wall. In their case, it's due to religious beliefs so we tend to avoid talking about anything with fanservice in it just so we they don't have to complain about it (unless that was the intent haha). But other than that, it's not a problem. My friends and I watch anime all the time and unless it's a really bad scene that's dragging on way to long, nobody really cares. We don't watch ecchi/primarily fanservice based shows together anyway. Only time we really did that was with Bikini Warriors to see how laughably bad it was and the episodes were about 3 minutes long so it didn't matter. Other than that, nobody really watches them other than me since I watch almost every genre.
 
Top Bottom