Can you read? That's a blog post written by a reader! The staff has nothing to do with that.
And people have to learn the difference between reports (of stuff we saw elsewhere) and posts tagged "INFO GAMEBLOG" that contain information that we've gotten from our sources.
Correct me if I'm wrong but Gameblog was (for example) the site who broke the news that Julien Merceron (Kojima Productions) had left Konami right? Did we just invent that?
Did Gameblog invent that Assassin's Creed 5 would take place in Paris and reveal the name of the character?
Those are just two examples.
So again you are supposedly a professional representing your website here on this forum but you are talking down to people and you are wondering why your website has a bad reputation?
Second both of those headlines you cite originated from either game forums or Reddit with the AC rumor even being here on NeoGAF and then Kotaku over a week before the article on your site was published. That is not a win for you nor does it prove you're reliable. All it proves is that your site finds rumors all over the web and republishes them then some of them turn out to be true. Of the rumors that your site does not find elsewhere they are either painfully obvious things nobody would think to post as rumors or they are wrong the vast majority of the time. That is why your website is not trusted and your posts and attitude in this thread certainly aren't doing it any favors to reverse that.
Arrogant prick? I'd love to see how you would react if people shit on what you do all the time all the while spewing fake information about what you do.
People keep refering to stuff that predates my arrival at Gameblog more than two years ago as proof that the site is unreliable. Over the years, and when it comes to "scoops" (and not "reports"), Gameblog has been more right than wrong.
And why don't you quote our long interviews with people from the industry like Phil Spencer, Shuhei Yoshida, Hideo Kojima, Patrice Désilets and so on? Are those shit as well?
I work in a job where I get evaluated regularly. It is literally someone's job to come in and critique my work. But I'm a professional so my response is to actually listen to that feedback and learn from it. I absolutely do not insult the person who is giving me feedback nor do I try to correct them on why they are "wrong."
Reputations are earned over a period of time and they take a longer time to change. If you want the site to have a better reputation prove ppl wrong about it and that will happen. Telling them off and insulting them will absolutely not make that happen.
You want proof? Look at the way Kotaku has gained such a positive reputation when it comes to investigative journalism after being reviled by so much of the gaming community for its click bait content for years and years. They did that by consistently creating quality content and after awhile people gave them the props they deserved for it.
You are acting like you are owed a good reputation just because you weren't a part of the site during previous mishaps when in reality it is the site's reputation that people keep in mind when considering validity not yours. Changing it will take time and work not childish insults and rudely dismissive diatribes misrepresenting people's words or arguments. I suggest you stop soon as this behavior has consequences on this forum.