More_Badass
Member
Good gameplay and aesthetic is timeless, regardless of nostalgia or historyOne day someone will make a like of this sort that disregards nostalgia, importance and "history." Then it will be kinda interesting.
Good gameplay and aesthetic is timeless, regardless of nostalgia or historyOne day someone will make a like of this sort that disregards nostalgia, importance and "history." Then it will be kinda interesting.
One day someone will make a like of this sort that disregards nostalgia, importance and "history." Then it will be kinda interesting.
Did RotTR win a single GOTY from a major publication last year?
One day someone will make a like of this sort that disregards nostalgia, importance and "history." Then it will be kinda interesting.
Sure does. And as expected, it brought out the expected reactions that occur when someone doesn't choose the expected games as their favoritesDoes Time have GOTY awards?
Yeah those aren't major.TechSmart, TechCentral, Gulf News, and Gameswelt.
Sure does. And as it expected, it brought out the expected reactions that occur when someone doesn't choose the expected games as their favorites
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1144775
One day someone will make a like of this sort that disregards nostalgia, importance and "history." Then it will be kinda interesting.
There are probably 100 games you could list here before RotTR that would be less head turning.YO.
Rise of the Tomb Raider?
But no Deus Ex?
Jesus.
Sure does. And as it expected, it brought out the expected reactions that occur when someone doesn't choose the expected games as their favorites
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1144775
Nintendo filling the top 10?
Another day, another slay
And lmao @ Bloodborne stans thinking their game belongs in the top 10
It's Time's "Best Video Games of All Time", why are you trying to push this false most important narrative?You clearly have no idea how important Oregon Trail was.
It's in the top of a much better list
It's Time's "Best Video Games of All Time", why are you trying to push this false most important narrative?
I always dislike lists like this for the sole fact that it's not really the "best" videogames, but rather the most important or influential ones.
That list is great, but it also seems to be going for something entirely different, and actually more focused. Even saying that though, that list is a bit silly in its own way.
Dark Souls as the best game of all time? LMAO. It's easily my favorite game of the last decade, but it's nowhere near the best game of "all time".
It's in the top 10 of a much better list
Yeah I know, it should be Demon's, but other than that it's a good list
A much better list that has Far Cry 4 and Little Big Planet 3 in front of Witcher 3
I have to wonder how long some of you have actually been playing games for, or if you actually remember what the previous generations were like. It's been said more than once, but the main reason the Souls games stand out in the current environment is because of how old school they are. If these games were made during the PS2 era, they wouldn't have had as much of an impact as they did.
Really bizarre list because of how it glosses over games that fundamentally changed the games industry on both technical and design levels such as Elite 1984.
One day someone will make a list of this sort that disregards nostalgia, importance and "history." Then it will be kinda interesting.
From was making similar games back then. They don't even come close to Souls in playability
Uh, you just unintentionally agreed. Not only that, but what you're actually thinking of had more to do with hardware limitations than anything else. Kings Field was the closest comparison, and it was actually quite playable. It just wasn't a third person action game, although it had the atmosphere and obliqueness down long before Demon's Souls arrival. Otogi would be the next closest, and the Souls games were somewhat an almagamation of the two.
Edge made a list based on the best games you can play today, rather than "most influential" or whatever. King's Field games are nearly unplayable today due to the first person perspective and hardware limitations
I have to wonder how long some of you have actually been playing games for, or if you actually remember what the previous generations were like. It's been said more than once, but the main reason the Souls games stand out in the current environment is because of how old school they are. If these games were made during the PS2 era, they wouldn't have had as much of an impact as they did.
That's less of a reflection of the quality of the Souls games and simply a matter of what the majority of games are like now.
it wont even be top 20 this year