• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

There is no convincing (some) Trump supporters

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mahonay

Banned
Why would you even attempt to discuss these matters with a black Trump supporter. (S)he is already special. You have to be on some Stacy Dash levels of ignorance or Ben Carson levels of self-hate to support his platform and hand-wave his rhetoric.

You can be a black Republican. Do your thing. But I don't accept holding your nose and casting a vote for Donald Trump knowing everything we know about his character, mettle and opinions.
Yep. Pretty much this.
 
Your response to "that was in the past" should have been "what has Trump done to demonstrate that this is in the past? Why do you assume that this is not still a part of who he is?"
 

Mahonay

Banned
Your response to "that was in the past" should have been "what has Trump done to demonstrate that this is in the past? Why do you assume that this is not still a part of who he is?"
raw
 

Precisely :v It's the perfect response because it challenges them to make specific defenses of a person. It's a tactic I employ whenever people defend police by saying that the actions of police are in the past, and it's usually pretty effective as far as negatively affecting their composure in the discussion.
 
If Trump wins this election, I'm posting on Facebook for anyone on my friends list that voted for him to go f themselves and unfriend me.
 

atr0cious

Member
Go back and read mid83'a post. "White supremacy" is not the reasoning of most Trump voters. The guy in the OP wasn't even white to begin with.

This talking point / meme is getting stale, and like all talking points, it's just an attempt to explain a complex phenomenon with a simple buzzword.
It doesn't matter why they think they're voting for him, he's running on a platform of hate. When you say, oh hey the Hillary supporters are just as stubborn, you're completely missing the reason why. By and far, Hillary supporters want to help trump supporters cause they know it's not their fault, you can not say the same for how trump supporters see Hillary supporters.
 

Agent Icebeezy

Welcome beautful toddler, Madison Elizabeth, to the horde!
I have friends who like his political stances and believe all of the downright racist ideas he has are entirely for show and to drum up votes. They think he'll drop off all of the racist shit once he wins

For the longest time, I've always wondered if they ask themselves why there is a need to pretend to be a racist, misogynistic asshole only just to say I'm kidding when it's all said and done. What type of mental gymnastics does one have do to arrive at that thought process. Those people fucking scare me.
 

AYF 001

Member
My point is that not all black women (such as the woman in the video) will support Hillary, especially when she's vocalized her hatred for black people in the past.
Are you saying we should try to make trump supporters switch by convincing them Hillary hates black people more?
 

Noirulus

Member
If all you have is that statement for this claim, you need to rethink what you're saying, or come with more proof.

I mean, it's right there in the video of the lady protesting. She called black people "superpredators" in the 90s. I mean, how do you not know this if you're a Clinton supporter?

Another one that hit me really hard (I'm of Indian origin) and made me so fucking angry, is that she made a joke about Mahatma Gandhi being the owner of a gas station back in 2003.. Gandhi is a hero to me and billions of other people, and she made a joke out of how much he's done for my nation and for the world. His philosophy inspired so many people, including MLK Jr. himself.

Who knows, maybe she changed, but people remember. And personally, I don't believe in her integrity.
 
I can tell you what GAF 'convincing' looks like to a Trump supporter:

GAF: Why do you support Trump?
Trump supporter: *Gives reasons*
GAF: Bad reasons. You're just racist.
 

Mahonay

Banned
I can tell you what GAF 'convincing' looks like to a Trump supporter:

GAF: Why do you support Trump?
Trump supporter: *Gives reasons*
GAF: Bad reasons. You're just racist.
If they are uneducated and bad reasons we are allowed to criticize it.

I've several instances where hard proof and evidence is provided by people here as to why Trump support is a bad idea, which is often met with a giant shoulder shrug and more denial by the supporter.
 

EmSeta

Member
Trump is openly racist as opposed to some Republican candidates in the past who were passive about it. This is very different.

Yes there are SOME black people who are behind Trump, but that number is literally about .01%, and those who are voting for him have real issues with race themselves.

Suggesting there is any kind of meaningful black contingent behind Trump is 100 percent false. It's rare.

Okay, let's say you're a black evangelical Christian. Making abortion illegal is your number one priority. But it "makes no sense" to vote for Trump/Pence this election?

People are more than the color of their skin. Race isn't the only issue in America.
 

JeTmAn81

Member
I can tell you what GAF 'convincing' looks like to a Trump supporter:

GAF: Why do you support Trump?
Trump supporter: *Gives reasons*
GAF: Bad reasons. You're just racist.

Pretty much. I'm also no Trump fan but around here the rhetoric about him and anyone who might vote for him is pretty extreme.

I think the best you can do is lay out a few basic points about his policies. If the person doesn't already know about this, maybe they'll listen. Maybe not. Either way, after that it's time to go about your day. Railing at someone for hours isn't going to change their mind.
 

commedieu

Banned
I can tell you what GAF 'convincing' looks like to a Trump supporter:

GAF: Why do you support Trump?
Trump supporter: *Gives reasons*
GAF: Bad reasons. You're just racist.

Its usually because those reasons are from white supremacist websites. When they are called out for bigotry or racism, its generally because its a direct link to stormfront.
 
For a lot of people this election is just about the SCOTUS.

This is what the overriding theme of the election should be for both campaigns and for voters, what with how hated each of the two candidates are.

If there was a concerted effort to create a dialogue with people about what having 2 new Scalias on the court would mean I think a lot of people would quickly get over their reticence for voting for Hillary...
 

Order

Member
Who? I'm talking about a hypothetical person here. I'm not a black evangelical Christian. Neither would I vote for Trump.
I guess you could say I'm referring to people who vote for Trump because of his non race related views.
 

Mahonay

Banned
Okay, let's say you're a black evangelical Christian. Making abortion illegal is your number one priority. But it "makes no sense" to vote for Trump/Pence this election?

People are more than the color of their skin. Race isn't the only issue in America.
Why would there be a sudden surge of black Republican votes this election when in the past the black vote is always overwhelmingly Democratic? They waited all this time for someone like Trump to come along? "Oh this guy really seems to hate us more than other candidates in the past, time to get on this Republican action."

Easy to say the color of your skin doesn't matter that much if you are not black in America, which already comes along with nearly unavoidable hardships (big or small) which would only becomes worse with a Trump presidency.

Your argument is entirely theoretical and not the reality.
 

commedieu

Banned
This is what the overriding theme of the election should be for both campaigns and for voters, what with how hated each of the two candidates are.

If people were taught what potentially having 2 new Scalias on the court woud mean would mean I think a lot of people would quickly get over their reticence for voting for Hillary...

I disagree. People are willing to go through this.. to prove a point. Even those in the reticle of the republican party. I just don't understand their endgame.

1. Trump wins!
2. Republicans go full republican.
3. (static)
4. Gary Johnson/Bernie Sanders wins?

we've gone fucking plaid.
 

USC-fan

Banned
Okay, let's say you're a black evangelical Christian. Making abortion illegal is your number one priority. But it "makes no sense" to vote for Trump/Pence this election?

People are more than the color of their skin. Race isn't the only issue in America.

Race isn't even a top 5 issues in this election.
 

EmSeta

Member
I guess you could say I'm referring to people who vote for Trump because of his non race related views.

My whole point was a response to the post "I can't vote for Trump - I'm black!".

Hell, I even have a black relative who I'm pretty sure is going to vote for Trump.
 

JeTmAn81

Member
I guess you could say I'm referring to people who vote for Trump because of his non race related views.

Those people either:

1. Don't accept your premise that life under Trump would be worse for minorities

Or

2. Think that's an acceptable price to pay for control of SCOTUS
 

Mahonay

Banned
My whole point was a response to the post "I can't vote for Trump - I'm black!".

Hell, I even have a black relative who I'm pretty sure is going to vote for Trump.
You know ONE black person who might vote for Trump. This is evidence to you that there will be a sudden influx of new black Republican voters this election?
 

commedieu

Banned
You know ONE black person who might vote for Trump. This is evidence to you that there will be a sudden influx of new black Republican voters this election?

MAAAHOOOONNEEYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!!!!! move it move it move it!

sorry.

I know more than one... its a disturbing amount to be honest.
 
Okay, let's say you're a black evangelical Christian. Making abortion illegal is your number one priority. But it "makes no sense" to vote for Trump/Pence this election?

People are more than the color of their skin. Race isn't the only issue in America.
You know he's polling so low with black people that we've had results that showed him possibly going below 0% if you assume the stated margin of error, right?
 
I don't know of any black people voting for Trump and I come from a black family.

I also never see Trump signs and I live in Edmond, Oklahoma.

I also tend to not use anecdotal evidence as an example of anything.
 

Bleepey

Member
Why would you even attempt to discuss these matters with a black Trump supporter. (S)he is already special. You have to be on some Stacy Dash levels of ignorance or Ben Carson levels of self-hate to support his platform and hand-wave his rhetoric.

You can be a black Republican. Do your thing. But I don't accept holding your nose and casting a vote for Donald Trump knowing everything we know about his character, mettle and opinions.

I never understood voting for Republicans when if there was a white paper bag test for voting they'd implement it.
 
Pretty much. I'm also no Trump fan but around here the rhetoric about him and anyone who might vote for him is pretty extreme.

I think the best you can do is lay out a few basic points about his policies. If the person doesn't already know about this, maybe they'll listen. Maybe not. Either way, after that it's time to go about your day. Railing at someone for hours isn't going to change their mind.

People do that all the time. You're just cherry picking if you think that this is the case.
 
People do that all the time. You're just cherry picking if you think that this is the case.

rhetoric about him and anyone who might vote for him is pretty extreme.

Think about that. Not him or half the loons. Not the actual words coming out of their mouths. Not the calls to hang or execute a person running for president. Not a woman who claims no racism existed in the 60s and that Obama started racism. Not the guy who said he'd pay for his supporter's bail if they assault a protester. Not the guy that wants stop and frisk in black neighborhoods.

Nah. Everyone here is extreme in his eyes. Seriously, think about that. Doesn't surprise me, even a little..
 

atr0cious

Member
I mean, it's right there in the video of the lady protesting. She called black people "superpredators" in the 90s. I mean, how do you not know this if you're a Clinton supporter?

Another one that hit me really hard (I'm of Indian origin) and made me so fucking angry, is that she made a joke about Mahatma Gandhi being the owner of a gas station back in 2003.. Gandhi is a hero to me and billions of other people, and she made a joke out of how much he's done for my nation and for the world. His philosophy inspired so many people, including MLK Jr. himself.

Who knows, maybe she changed, but people remember. And personally, I don't believe in her integrity.
As a black man born in the 80s I know how bad the 90s were for us. Black people agreed with that statement then. It's only now in the post micro aggression world, do we know that what she said was wrong. This doesn't make her a virulent racist of some sort. It means in a moment of trying to look tough, she should've chosen better words. And if you're going to argue that they knew that the bill would have the effect it would and that they were cool with that, you'd also be wrong. But this is also placing blame on her for backing her husband's policies as if she crafted them herself, and not Joe Biden the original author.

Besides all this, her actions before and after this in regards to lower income communities goes directly against that same train of thought. And Ghandi was a racist himself, but that doesn't excuse an off color joke, though a little poetic. But that still doesn't equate to "hatred" for people of color. Especially since her actions don't support that.
 
I mean, it's right there in the video of the lady protesting. She called black people "superpredators" in the 90s. I mean, how do you not know this if you're a Clinton supporter?

I am going to quote myself on this subject.

Clinton was referring to drug cartels and gangs, but employed an incredibly disastrous phrase that insinuated the issue was with minority youth in general. Was it a dumb remark in hindsight? Yup. Was it offensive? Sure was, even mitigated by context, because it empowered the racist imagery of black kids as thugs. HRC was rightfully put on blast and has owned up to that mistake, repeatedly, over and over.

Now, does this incidence of (extreme) poor word choice from 1996 erase her entire history of fighting for civil rights, from the 1960s onward? Is it more indicative of who she is as a person and a politician than collectively everything else she has said and, more importantly, done? Does it negate her voting record? Or the time and work she's put in advocating causes important to African Americans, or her outreach to our communities? I've concluded the answer to all of that is "no."

The superpredator remark is so often brought up by people who appear to be searching for any reason, any at all, to find fault with HRC.

Another one that hit me really hard (I'm of Indian origin) and made me so fucking angry, is that she made a joke about Mahatma Gandhi being the owner of a gas station back in 2003.. Gandhi is a hero to me and billions of other people, and she made a joke out of how much he's done for my nation and for the world. His philosophy inspired so many people, including MLK Jr. himself.

Who knows, maybe she changed, but people remember. And personally, I don't believe in her integrity.

You call Gandhi your hero. Here is a man whose contempt for blacks is well known. A man whose racism is so notable and so offensive that Ghanaians have defaced his statue at the University of Ghana and have started a campaign to have it removed completely. A man who described Africans as "savages." A man who abhored the idea of Indians living with blacks, who he thought of as lowly and ignorant. You act concerned about Clinton's superpredator remark while admiring a man who spoke of Africans in a manner not at all dissimilar from the most racist Jim Crower.

You are a hypocrite, and your hypocrisy is massive.
 

atr0cious

Member
I am going to quote myself on this subject.


The superpredator remark is so often brought up by people who appear to be searching for any reason, any at all, to find fault with HRC.



You call Gandhi your hero. Here is a man whose contempt for blacks is well known. A man who's racism is so notable and so offensive that Ghanaians have defaced his statue at the University of Ghana and have started a campaign to have it removed completely. A man who described Africans as "savages." A man who abhored the idea of Indians living with blacks, who he thought of as lowly and ignorant. You act concerned about Clinton's superpredator remark while admiring a man who spoke of Africans in a manner not at all dissimilar from the most racist Jim Crower.

You are a hypocrite, and your hypocrisy is massive.
I swear I was looking for an old post of yours when I originally posted. Great as always.
 
I mean, it's right there in the video of the lady protesting. She called black people "superpredators" in the 90s. I mean, how do you not know this if you're a Clinton supporter?

Another one that hit me really hard (I'm of Indian origin) and made me so fucking angry, is that she made a joke about Mahatma Gandhi being the owner of a gas station back in 2003.. Gandhi is a hero to me and billions of other people, and she made a joke out of how much he's done for my nation and for the world. His philosophy inspired so many people, including MLK Jr. himself.

Who knows, maybe she changed, but people remember. And personally, I don't believe in her integrity.

The comparison fails because Hillary cares about rising above her comments. Trump meanwhile called for the execution of specific black teens, and when they were exonerated, suggested that they were up to no good anyway so what he said was okay. AKA, Trump's ego is more valuable than innocent people's lives. But yes, exactly the same

Think about that. Not him or half the loons. Not the actual words coming out of their mouths. Not the calls to hang or execute a person running for president. Not a woman who claims no racism existed in the 60s and that Obama started racism. Not the guy who said he'd pay for his supporter's bail if they assault a protester. Not the guy that wants stop and frisk in black neighborhoods.

Nah. Everyone here is extreme in his eyes. Seriously, think about that. Doesn't surprise me, even a little..

Seriously. Cherry picking instances of people getting frustrated by supporters of one of the worst major candidates in American history totally exemplifies the "extreme" people.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom