No, it really is. As long as fan games uses assets and designs from official licensed products, they are in murky water. There's a world of difference between this category, which is fan based and most of the other ones, which are jury based. This isn't just petty hate from Nintendo, that's the most childish way of looking at this possible.
The only games missing are games that were C&Ded and issued with DMCA takedowns.
It's not ridiculous at all to assume that that is the background to their removal.
AM2R is better than any Nintendo game this year.
Well, that wasn't exactly hard this time around.This is actually true.
Well, that wasn't exactly hard this time around.
Twitch Plays Pokemon is something else entirely, mainly because it's not even a fan game, it's the same game but played by a chat room. You could say that it's kinda illegal since it's emulation (even though it can be done on the actual hardware), but Nintendo was admittedly less shitty about this before than now.
This is actually true.
You mean the things corporations abuse to get people to cave because they know the poor schmucks could never stand against the onslaught of their corporate lawyers?Not contesting an accusation is in fact legally an admission that the charge is correct but without claiming guilt.
It is known as Nolo Contendere.
I actually couldn't remember if there were ads or not. Wonder if anyone else can remember.Twitch Plays Pokemon is arguably more illegal than AM2R. It is essentially an unaltered ROM vs some reused assets and general gameplay outline on IP.
Did anyone make money off Twitch Plays Pokemon? That would also set it apart.
Nintendo is just in turbo salty-mode because almost no one wanted Federation Force compared to a real Metroid game like AM2R.
Well, that wasn't exactly hard this time around.
Yes, the stream accepts donations and subs. The streamer used the money to buy a better computer about a year ago to support newer games and right now the stream is playing Pokemon Sun. The first run had ads during the last five days or so, but before then there was nothing.Did anyone make money off Twitch Plays Pokemon? That would also set it apart.
Twitch is paying out double for ads right now. This time of year has the biggest spend on advertising.Yes, the stream accepts donations and subs. The streamer used the money to buy a better computer about a year ago to support newer games and right now the stream is playing Pokemon Sun. The first run had ads during the last five days or so, but before then there was nothing.
Not sure where the money goes now, but people who donate have more perks.
Discussing them at an awards show is not murky water in any way. My point is giving them an award is totally legal. It's truly not murky at all. Nintendo might not like it but that shouldn't matter if their intention was to be impartial in the first place
Yeah, those no contests really mean so much in our fucked up legal system with our fucked up IP laws!
You might believe that there is some scenario where Pokemon Uranium or Another Metroid 2 Remake are not clear cut derivative works of Pokemon or Metroid, but I don't.
Which would be the death of the entire award. What do you think how other publishers would react when the Game Awards starts to push companies into certain directions? They would fear something similar might happen to them, stop their support and move/create an alternative event and the old one dies.
And in the context of recognizing their existence at this event, that's largely irrelevant. Especially when Nintendo has already allowed properties they have ownership in to receive awards in this category.You might believe that there is some scenario where Pokemon Uranium or Another Metroid 2 Remake are not clear cut derivative works of Pokemon or Metroid, but I don't.
Yup. That award actually seems worse if the dude made money from it to buy a new computer.Twitch Plays Pokemon is also a derivative work of Pokemon, which is a much more valuable IP than Metroid. People were literally playing a Pokemon game free online. And the people who violated IP made money off of it. That constitutes a larger threat to IP than a remake of an old game that borrowed some assets.
People are questioning why Nintendo has chosen to suppress AM2R rather than if they are able to. Motivation versus ability. Right now Nintendo just seems salty that Federation Force flopped into the bargain bin.
Thats a nice wish you have there. I sincerely hope you are active politically, because thats what its going to take to make that wish of yours more than just a wish. You are on the wrong side of the law on this. There's going to need to be major changes for this desire of yours to see reality. Message board posts ain't going to solve it
There's definitely an argument to be made winning awards is profiting from an IP.
It is certainly gaining more exposure at the expense of other - I would argue more deserving - candidates.
Discussing them at an awards show is not murky water in any way. My point is giving them an award is totally legal. It's truly not murky at all. Nintendo might not like it but that shouldn't matter if their intention was to be impartial in the first place
I take it you're a lawyer who specializes in this very specific subject, so what if Nintendo games got played in a more morally ambiguous award/convention/whatever, they would have no power over it?
In this context, AM2R is a really fantastic game and the TGA is by all accounts a very reputable award. But what if it was a more contentious use of their intelectual property and/or a more questionable award?
I take it you're a lawyer who specializes in this very specific subject, so what if Nintendo games got played in a more morally ambiguous award/convention/whatever, they would have no power over it?
In this context, AM2R is a really fantastic game and the TGA is by all accounts a very reputable award. But what if it was a more contentious use of their intelectual property and/or a more questionable award?
I wasn't saying what companies should do but what they most likely would. Even though the Awards are financed indepently they still depent from the support of the industry.So, the companies should be pushing the Game Awards in a certain direction instead? Nintendo had a right to take the games down, but they have no right to erase them from existence. They probably threatened the Game Awards in some way to make this happen in the first place.
But let's not pretend that Nintendo couldn't readily accept the fan game - even PROMOTE it like some publishers and developers - instead of going out of their way to nuke it from orbit and reap the constant stream of bad PR by doing so.
You don't have to be a lawyer to say anyone can give an award to anything.
AM2R is better than any Nintendo game this year.
Geoff's on Twitch talking about TGAs, and yeah, he's saying Nintendo weren't cool with these two games being in the show. Didn't give them the heads up beforehand (nor did he tip off the creators), said the show would be at risk if he didn't pull them, so yeah, they went.
Pretty obvious, but hey, he's said it now himself and he said it's a bummer. Which it is!
AM2R is godlike. Hilarious that one guy has given the fans more than Nintendo has the past decade in terms of good Metroid.