• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

World Press Photo of the Year 2017

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tripon

Member
A dramatic image of the assassination of Russia’s ambassador to Turkey was named the Photo of the Year in the 2017 World Press Photo contest. The photo was taken in December during a routine assignment at a photo exhibition that Burhan Ozbilici, an Associated Press photographer, decided to attend at the last moment simply because it was on his way home. He arrived during Ambassador Andrey G. Karlov’s speech, and within moments a 22-year-old off-duty police officer, Mevlut Mert Altintas, opened fire. Although Mr. Ozbilici was no more than 15 feet from the gunman, he did not run.

“I was afraid, but I did not panic,” Mr. Ozbilici, 59, said in a phone interview. “I’m a journalist and I had to stand and do my job even if I got hit or killed. At that moment I tried to represent not just A.P. but all good independent journalists.”

https://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2017...world-press-awards/?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur

qH9yQ3G.jpg
 
Maybe, but it wouldn't surprise me if that guy turned out to be a suicide shooter working for Putin, with designs on disposing of the Ambassador while blaming the motivation on Islamic terrorism... in which case, the photograph in a sense could be betraying the truth.
 

jem0208

Member
The other photo from that scene is more incredible imo. The one from the side with the paintings.

This is the one:
97T3DJs.jpg
 

TrutaS

Member
Turtle or Fallow Deer for me. Don't really fancy photos with dead people, I do know they are important for a reporting point-of-view, though.
 

NEO0MJ

Member
Turtle or Fallow Deer for me. Don't really fancy photos with dead people, I do know they are important for a reporting point-of-view, though.

That's one of the main reasons according to the article, and it makes sense. Morbid as it may be this is one of those moments Photojournalists dream of.
 
The composition of this is bizarrely good considering the circumstances

Mix of good moment, good space (gallery spaces are usually done such that they are very well readable which translates directly to good two dimensional composition), but most importantly good use of bending your knees.

Personally don't think the op photo is very good... but i do like that it's basically an anthem to the ethics of photojournalism.
 

Afro

Member
"World's Best Photo" because of the context or composition? Because it's an awful photo composition-wise.
 

mandiller

Member
Completely tasteless to release a photo like that. That ambassador surely had a family. Imagine if that was your father and you had to keep seeing that photo around the internet. I hope the photographer actually sought the next of kin's permission to release those photos...
 

Tripon

Member
Completely tasteless to release a photo like that. That ambassador surely had a family. Imagine if that was your father and you had to keep seeing that photo around the internet. I hope the photographer actually sought the next of kin's permission to release those photos...

This can't be a serious post.
 
Completely tasteless to release a photo like that. That ambassador surely had a family. Imagine if that was your father and you had to keep seeing that photo around the internet. I hope the photographer actually sought the next of kin's permission to release those photos...

No. Feelings do not stop history from being made and documented and disseminated.
 

Ray Wonder

Founder of the Wounded Tagless Children
Completely tasteless to release a photo like that. That ambassador surely had a family. Imagine if that was your father and you had to keep seeing that photo around the internet. I hope the photographer actually sought the next of kin's permission to release those photos...

Yeah, just like they should've asked JFK's family for permission to show the assassination footage.
 

StayDead

Member
Amazing photos, morbid, but it just goes to show that movies are made to emulate real life. The comparisons to movies make sense, but thinking about it, it just goes to show how well said movies have been shot.

RIP to the guy and condolences to his family, but they really are incredibly shot photographs, especially given the circumstances.
 

Kinyou

Member
Only part that bothers me is how that picture is likely used as propaganda by islamic extremists.

Maybe, but it wouldn't surprise me if that guy turned out to be a suicide shooter working for Putin, with designs on disposing of the Ambassador while blaming the motivation on Islamic terrorism... in which case, the photograph in a sense could be betraying the truth.
That seems like a stretch. Is there a history of Putin and the ambassador being enemies? And even then, there are tons of easier ways to get him out of that job.
 

Dalek

Member
When these photos first appeared I knew it would be a top photo of the year. The timing of that photo and the immediate sense of danger involved in taking it is insane.
 

Temp_User

Member
The other photo from that scene is more incredible imo. The one from the side with the paintings.

This is the one:
97T3DJs.jpg

I feel this is ripped from a Michael Mann movie. Anyway, that was pretty ballsy for the photographer to take these assassination shots.
 

Blader

Member
The other photo from that scene is more incredible imo. The one from the side with the paintings.

This is the one:
97T3DJs.jpg

The composition and color palette of this photo is unreal. This is some serious cinematic looking shit!

That doesn't mean that bullet wounds and blood don't happen.

He was shot from behind, so you're not gonna see a bullet wound while he's lying on his back. And in the second photo, you can see blood pooling underneath his head.
 

Futureman

Member
The other photo from that scene is more incredible imo. The one from the side with the paintings.

This is the one:
97T3DJs.jpg

this looks like a screen grab from a movie.

These are good photos, amazing even, but I as a photographer I would never choose a photo of someone who was just murdered as the "world's best photo."
 
Am I missing something? Where was that guy shot that there is no blood in either of the photos?
He was shot from behind, and he fell backwards. Any blood would have been in front of where he was standing (if the bullets went through him), or soaking into his clothes underneath him after he fell. The photos were taken before blood would have began to pool to a more visible size.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom