• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Spider-Man: Homecoming review thread [92% RT]

It'll probably bite me in the ass, but I'm cautiously optimistic about JL. The executives now in charge of the DCEU came on-board recently, and the first project they were able to really shepard was Wonder Woman. Obviously, a lot Wonder Woman's success rests at Patty Jenkins' feet, but I think that's a good sign for JL and the future of the DCEU.

I always want to be optimistic (especially since I enjoyed Wonder Woman and can't wait to see where they take the character next) but I have absolutely no faith whatsoever in Snyder.

Been burnt one too many times and nothing shown so far says to me that he learned how to make a good movie.
 
*Marvel delievers another stand-out movie*
"Too much fun!"
"They're graded on a curve!"


Please keep the shitposts coming. And by "please", I mean don't.

Fam. We're at the "MCU gets a curve in their reviews" portion of the grieving process, we've still got more to weather here.
 

Ottaro

Member
Critics Consensus: Spider-Man: Homecoming does whatever a second reboot can, delivering a colorful, fun adventure that fits snugly in the sprawling MCU without getting bogged down in franchise-building.

You just know someone at RT thought of this ages ago and has been itching to post it ever since :lol
 
It's not about Garfield trying and Tobey not trying. They're only reciting the lines written for them.

Ultimately, this is why I refrain from judging Tobey all that harshly.

He was cast to play a kid fresh out of high school at his age and the script was what it was.
 
Mendelson's review had alot of positive impressions in there, but the real sore spot for him is that this Spider-Man messes up alot in the movie.
 

Raguel

Member
You said: "Marvel really knows how to make a movie review well."

How on earth do you believe that they've done that, if not by just making a great film?

Don't engage him. Or do so we can enjoy the mental gymnastics that he will provide as he does in almost every thread.
 
You said: "Marvel really knows how to make a movie review well."

How on earth do you believe that they've done that, if not by just making a great film?

Because Marvel and other studios understand the game a bit? Let's go back to Dr. Strange. It sits at 90% but the average review is 7.3. Time and time again has shown you could make a really middle of the road average movie but reviewers will find that OK. It then boosts hype due to, ya know, what's currently happening right now.

All I'm saying is take it with a grain of salt. MCU % scores have been quite misleading in the past.
 

7Th

Member
It's probably gonna end between 88 and 91, which is actually pretty solid and better than expected. I'm still thinking Ragnarok is going to be the best comic book movie of the year, though.
 

Bronx-Man

Banned
Because Marvel and other studios understand the game a bit? Let's go back to Dr. Strange. It sits at 90% but the average review is 7.3. Time and time again has shown you could make a really middle of the road average movie but reviewers will find that OK. It then boosts hype due to, ya know, what's currently happening right now.

All I'm saying is take it with a grain of salt. MCU % scores have been quite misleading in the past.
It could just be a bunch of people liked a movie you didn't.
 

Grizzlyjin

Supersonic, idiotic, disconnecting, not respecting, who would really ever wanna go and top that
Almost every review seems to mention there is very little Tony. Which is hilarious considering how many people were complaining about this being Iron Man 4 when the trailers dropped
 
Because Marvel and other studios understand the game a bit? Let's go back to Dr. Strange. It sits at 90% but the average review is 7.3. Time and time again has shown you could make a really middle of the road average movie but reviewers will find that OK. It then boosts hype due to, ya know, what's currently happening right now.

All I'm saying is take it with a grain of salt. MCU % scores have been quite misleading in the past.

7.3 for a movie is great. This isn't IGN reviewing Assassin's Creed, guy. Logan is only a bit higher than that, and y'all loved that.

Marvel isn't doing anything to sway reviewers other than making great movies. Jesus.
 
If you're a comic book fan at all, I can't see how anyone can be salty over the film offerings we've had this year. Everybody's winning.
 
Almost every review seems to mention there is very little Tony. Which is hilarious considering how many people were complaining about this being Iron Man 4 when the trailers dropped

It was a joke from the start how many latched on to thinking this was Iron Man 4. Perfect example of the internet over reacting.

If you're a comic book fan at all, I can't see how anyone can be salty over the film offerings we've had this year. Everybody's winning.

But Marvel is pulling a fast one on the general public with their highly rated RT score.
 
Because Marvel and other studios understand the game a bit? Let's go back to Dr. Strange. It sits at 90% but the average review is 7.3. Time and time again has shown you could make a really middle of the road average movie but reviewers will find that OK. It then boosts hype due to, ya know, what's currently happening right now.

All I'm saying is take it with a grain of salt. MCU % scores have been quite misleading in the past.

First off, an average score of 7.3 is pretty fucking good. Film critics know how to use the whole scale, they're not game critics. There's not some big discrepancy there. That's a pretty normal score for a 90% blockbuster to end up with.

Secondly, if the game is so easy to understand, why do other studios keep fucking it up? A genuinely middle-of-the-road comic book movie like Man of Steel sits in the 50s. If it's so easy, why didn't DC just make it a little more middle-of-the-road so that it'd have a 90%?
 

Busty

Banned
I have to admit, there's a part of me that wants this film to be a critical and financial smash just to see whether it makes the growing feud between Sony and Marvel Studios break out into all out war.
 

Elandyll

Banned
Because Marvel and other studios understand the game a bit? Let's go back to Dr. Strange. It sits at 90% but the average review is 7.3. Time and time again has shown you could make a really middle of the road average movie but reviewers will find that OK. It then boosts hype due to, ya know, what's currently happening right now.

All I'm saying is take it with a grain of salt. MCU % scores have been quite misleading in the past.
Only if you don't understand how RT works though.
It's about a binary consensus (watch/ do not watch).
 
I have to admit, there's a part of me that wants this film to be a critical and financial smash just to see whether it makes the growing feud between Sony and Marvel Studios break out into all out war.

W-why would it do that?

If anything, it would make Sony calm down about their other Spidey plans, I'd imagine. These studios are just going to chase whatever they see as the most profitable route.
 

chadskin

Member
I have to admit, there's a part of me that wants this film to be a critical and financial smash just to see whether it makes the growing feud between Sony and Marvel Studios break out into all out war.

3f4.gif
 
It could just be a bunch of people liked a movie you didn't.

That's where it gets tricky with the words like and disliked. It's actually a big spectrum that Rotten Tomatoes doesn't want to engage with cause it's messy.

Again, all I'm saying is you shouldn't derive much hype from RT. It's usually not what the reviewers believe.
 

Oersted

Member
Because Marvel and other studios understand the game a bit? Let's go back to Dr. Strange. It sits at 90% but the average review is 7.3. Time and time again has shown you could make a really middle of the road average movie but reviewers will find that OK. It then boosts hype due to, ya know, what's currently happening right now.

All I'm saying is take it with a grain of salt. MCU % scores have been quite misleading in the past.

Yes, the scores are okay. Not rotten. Thats all what it needs. And yes, that easier to pass barrier is used for marketing.
 
Because Marvel and other studios understand the game a bit? Let's go back to Dr. Strange. It sits at 90% but the average review is 7.3. Time and time again has shown you could make a really middle of the road average movie but reviewers will find that OK. It then boosts hype due to, ya know, what's currently happening right now.

All I'm saying is take it with a grain of salt. MCU % scores have been quite misleading in the past.

This is your opinion of the movie. Not every reviewer is going to share this opinion. You not liking a movie that is well reviewed does not make the review numbers "misleading."
 

JayCB

Member
Because Marvel and other studios understand the game a bit? Let's go back to Dr. Strange. It sits at 90% but the average review is 7.3. Time and time again has shown you could make a really middle of the road average movie but reviewers will find that OK. It then boosts hype due to, ya know, what's currently happening right now.

All I'm saying is take it with a grain of salt. MCU % scores have been quite misleading in the past.

The middle of an out of ten grading system is 5.
 
That's where it gets tricky with the words like and disliked. It's actually a big spectrum that Rotten Tomatoes doesn't want to engage with cause it's messy.

Again, all I'm saying is you shouldn't derive much hype from RT. It's usually not what the reviewers believe.

WHAT

That's literally exactly what RT is about. If a critic likes a movie, it gets a red tomato. If they dislike it, it gets a green splat. It's not fucking complicated.
 
That's where it gets tricky with the words like and disliked. It's actually a big spectrum that Rotten Tomatoes doesn't want to engage with cause it's messy.

Again, all I'm saying is you shouldn't derive much hype from RT. It's usually not what the reviewers believe.

You seem pretty strong about wanting to convince people to not enjoy something. Why?

We enjoy movies. Check.
We enjoy CBM. Check.
We enjoy the MCU. Check.
We enjoy Spider Man. Check.

Knowing that something is reviewing well before you go see it gives a good feeling. I just don't understand why you need us to dismiss this.
 
That's where it gets tricky with the words like and disliked. It's actually a big spectrum that Rotten Tomatoes doesn't want to engage with cause it's messy.

Again, all I'm saying is you shouldn't derive much hype from RT. It's usually not what the reviewers believe.

The % is exactly what the reviewers believe, though.

It's literally the % of them that say "watch" and "do not watch". It's not supposed to be a perfect reflection of the average rating.

What the hell are you talking about?
 

AndersK

Member
You'd think the great run WW had would've made the usual suspects less man-babyish. But nah.

Watch this edge out WW but the slimmest margin in RT and average. This thread is gonna implode.
 

Blader

Member
Because Marvel and other studios understand the game a bit? Let's go back to Dr. Strange. It sits at 90% but the average review is 7.3. Time and time again has shown you could make a really middle of the road average movie but reviewers will find that OK. It then boosts hype due to, ya know, what's currently happening right now.

All I'm saying is take it with a grain of salt. MCU % scores have been quite misleading in the past.

It's not misleading if you know what RT percentages are actually referring to.
 
Top Bottom