DeepEnigma
Gold Member
If Sony can release it with a controller that isn't meant for a toddler, that'd be great too.
What does this even mean?
If Sony can release it with a controller that isn't meant for a toddler, that'd be great too.
He has big manly hands, and we all know what that means.What does this even mean?
He has big manly hands, and we all know what that means.
He has big manly hands, and we all know what that means.
He has big manly hands, and we all know what that means.
I was thinking big Gloves, but we can go with penis if you wish. I'm flexible.Tiny penis?
See my thread. I think the details sony spoke about are the scarlet details.Everything ms stated about next box is almost the same that Sony has said for PS5
I did a google image search and found this:What is a "Sony Pony?"
Is there a Sony Pony Pro I can buy?
A bit too late for the PS4 mate.
That's a good summary.Thinking about this logicially:
Microsoft don't need to spend money to be the most powerful, they just need a powerful console. As long as it plays games to an impressive standard, they only really need to push Gamepass and PC cross play.
Sony need to spend money on a powerful console so that they can power PSVR2 the best they can. Sure, it's a bonus to say they are the most powerful, but it's more out of need than out of want.
Does that make any sense?
That's a good summary.
Each company designs their console to meet certain goals, marketing a power advantage is just a nice bonus if it comes to them.
As far as consumers are concerned, I'm glad that (hopefully) any differences in power are small, so nobody will fell like they got the short end of the deal.
... but i can clearly "hear" the difference...They are the same design... .
This guy has one but it's custom made I believe:What is a "Sony Pony?"
Is there a Sony Pony Pro I can buy?
I don't get all the butthurt in this thread lol both sides we're basically word for word on what to expect for next gen. Some people in this thread sound like there ready to jump out a window if one console has more GB's than the other.
Colin has heard PS5 is more powerful too....
Colin has heard PS5 is more powerful too....
I mean, I don't give a shit about either, so it's not really that important for me, but every single rumor I've heard before this E3 suggested the exact opposite.
Talks about it around 40 min in for those looking.
Colin has heard PS5 is more powerful too....
I'm finding that funny, yet creepy
His twelve inch black cock goes into his mouth after, and he can’t fight back. RIP Throat.I'm finding that funny, yet creepy
Jesus Christ you just can't stop talking about dicks, can you?His twelve inch black cock goes into his mouth after, and he can’t fight back. RIP Throat.
I love dirty jokes. Don’t make me talk about your pee pee.Jesus Christ you just can't stop talking about dicks, can you?
It’s a cute gif.I just saw the gif... I mean... it's certainly disturbing.
I just saw the gif... I mean... it's certainly disturbing.
I just saw the gif... I mean... it's certainly disturbing.
No logic here.Thinking about this logicially:
Microsoft don't need to spend money to be the most powerful, they just need a powerful console. As long as it plays games to an impressive standard, they only really need to push Gamepass and PC cross play.
Sony need to spend money on a powerful console so that they can power PSVR2 the best they can. Sure, it's a bonus to say they are the most powerful, but it's more out of need than out of want.
Does that make any sense?
PS5 has devkits out in the wild so it wouldn’t be that difficult for him to find out if he wanted too.
I keep thinking today what the MS engineers were thinking... waste that much of space will never be a good think lol
They could have twice the GPU power without eSRAM... like near 2.5 TFs without increase the size of the chip.
Yeap even without Kinect the APU itself was more expensive to MS than Sony because it was bigger and the wields probably lower (that last point assumption based in the complexity and size).The design was calling for 8GB of ram and DDR3 was the only way of achieving that at the time. In order to make up for the lack of bandwidth in DDR3, they had to add ES RAM to compensate. You have to understand, MS was focusing on getting 8GB of ram from day one, well before 8GB of GDDR5 was even possible to fit. Game DVR, Live game broadcast and everything OS related that we take for granted today requires lots of ram. Sony on the other hand was content with 4GB of GDDR5 and it was their original target. Luck played a little part in it that at the very last minute Samsung started producing chips with enough density to allow 8GB to fit in the PS4.
It wasn't a money issue either as it's been shown that it actually costs more to produce MS chip with ES Ram than it does to produce Sony's, so the budget was there, people claiming that it had to do with Kinect taking part of the budget are wrong in part, and when I say in part, I mean because there was something taking a budget, and that was ES Ram taking die space budget from the GPU die forcing them to use less CU.
That wasn't necessarily the case for the og Xbox and Xbox 360, but let's use one generation as the basis of your entire argument.It won’t matter if it’s not. Sony will always have them beat in the most important thing. Games....