Speedwagon
Michelangelo painted the Sistine Chapel. Yabuki turned off voice chat in Mario Kart races. True artists of their time.
Ew no these are meant to be like GameBoy colorsOK, but where are these versions?
Ew no these are meant to be like GameBoy colorsOK, but where are these versions?
YuckIf anything, they were downgraded because now it doesn't have to upscale for TV mode.
Madness this can't be docked. It's exactly the system I wanted to buy my Daughter, but not being able to dock it... Frustrating.
The total lack of TV out is a bit surprising to me. It has the same USB-C port at the bottom and Engadget at least thinks the Lite is using the same processor as the original.
I somewhat expected them to introduce a separate Lite dock or a USB-to-HDMI cable. Is it really a technical limitation or just market differentiation? I guess the inevitable teardowns will prove it out.
60% power reduction from 16nm aloneThey did say that, how much longer is another story.
This is no different than 2DS, it’s for people who don’t care for 3D feature and in this case, connecting to TV.
There is no lack of Tv out they are just not advertising it as suck to make the original Switch stay appealingThe total lack of TV out is a bit surprising to me. It has the same USB-C port at the bottom and Engadget at least thinks the Lite is using the same processor as the original.
I somewhat expected them to introduce a separate Lite dock or a USB-to-HDMI cable. Is it really a technical limitation or just market differentiation? I guess the inevitable teardowns will prove it out.
Its for the moms and dads buying it for their kid on Christmas to play pokemon during car rides... they will not care about that stuff. It will sell MILLIONS and MILLIONS! Its not for you and me; they want us to shell out $400 for the Switch Pro coming out next year.
Actually, Nintendo says that the Switch Lite is NOT a 3DS replacement.This thread is page after page of people bitching that the smaller, lighter, $100 cheaper Switch doesn't have all the features of the old Switch.
Want TV out, rumble, detachable joy cons etc...? Buy the old model Switch or wait for its refresh. Pretty simple. Nintendo is obviously going after the portable 2DS/3DS market with this, and will succeed in doing it.
It is indeed done for the sake of name recognition, even though it's technically incorrect. I don't believe that many people interested in the system will bother about the name.
There is no lack of Tv out they are just not advertising it as suck to make the original Switch stay appealing
Actually, Nintendo says that the Switch Lite is NOT a 3DS replacement.
The smaller compact design may alleviate some that issue (i considered the switch to be a little too wide honestly)
But if not, i recommend getting one of those third party grip cases. Thats helped quite a bit for me.
Eventually it will, nintendo just wants to keeps selling 3DS but are they even making 3DS games anymore?Actually, Nintendo says that the Switch Lite is NOT a 3DS replacement.
Why are people complaining about no TV output for a device built exclusively for handheld play?
They said the same thing about the Wii U when the Switch was released.
They said that the Switch wasn't a Wii U replacement?
They also said the ds wasnt a gba replacement but rather a third pillar. To which surprise it *did* eventually replace the gba.Eventually it will, nintendo just wants to keeps selling 3DS but are they even making 3DS games anymore?
Yeah most likely wanting to sell any left over stock. Switch Lite will dominate in Japan and once it hits $150 its game over for the 3DS.They also said the ds wasnt a gba replacement but rather a third pillar. To which surprise it *did* eventually replace the gba.
With pokemon fully moving on to the switch and no new heavy hitters insight, the 3ds is basically on life support.
4:07
'First off, since Nintendo Switch Lite is a dedicated handheld device, it won't connect to a TV.'
Tin foil is not made of tin but aluminium, and blackboards are usually dark green.
So basically you take this 199$ product, add 80$ for Joy cons, and 50-90$ for a dock/wire or whatever to attach to your TV.
I still can't get over the name. They called it a Switch because it switches from tv to portable and vice versa. They made a whole ad around that. Now the Lite doesn't, it shouldn't have Switch in its name. Switch Lite should still mean it switches, but this is a Lite version, meaning no dock included.lmao a Switch that can't switch.
That is how they are advertising it. The capability is there, especially since it just uses the USB-C connector, people can make it connect to HDMI probably. If you had an open Switch dock that might even work. The only thing is that it might be software restricted so a 3rd party or hacker might have to be involved.
It will probably not be able to do 1080p though, especially on modern titles. It is not as powerful as the regular Switch, at least the heat management.
There is no lack of Tv out they are just not advertising it as suck to make the original Switch stay appealing
I absolutely get that. I'm just curious what the reasoning was.
I absolutely get that. I'm just curious what the reasoning was.
Tin foil is not made of tin but aluminium,
Seriously, the consumer has to make up a better name (we don't work for Nintendo) or stay silent about the existing one? I suppose you say that about bad games too? If we can't make a better game we shouldn't comment it?people complaining about the name have yet to come up with a good alternative.
I don’t think it will cause much confusion. It’s been out long enough that people get the concept and marketing can clearly delineate that this is a cheaper, smaller option for the handheld crowd. I’ve never been convinced the hybrid thing drove sales much beyond the first year anyway, I think it’s more been the games like BOTW, Mario Odyssey, Smash Ultimate etc that have kept people buying and this just opens the market more by getting into the handheld crowd more directly.
They had to tap that market. They missed their sales targets last fiscal year so they needed to get into their handheld base that’s always been their bread and butter and niot their consoles. Even the DS outsold the hugely successful Wii by a larger amount and the GBA and 3DS did well while the GC and Wii U were failing. The 3DS was failing at $250 so it was a must to get under $200, even by a cent, for perception of value in the handheld market.
A ton of their base is very price conscious- parents who’s kids want more than tablet games, handheld gamers used to cheap hardware, casuals just playing a few games here and there, gamers buying it as a second or third PC platform etc.
Mate, the DS plays Gameboy advance games, and it doesn't have Gameboy in its name. That's not an excuse. We all know they named it Switch because of what it does. They made a whole ad campaign around how it switches.its not a 3DS replacement because it does not play 3DS games. you will need a 3DS to do that.
it does play Switch games, which is good, cos it is called a Switch. funny how that works.
people complaining about the name have yet to come up with a good alternative. i haven't seen a single one. what are they supposed to call a device that plays all Switch games, but they can't use the word Switch in the title?
if someone can come up with a single good name that conveys that the system plays all Switch games but is portable only, and it doesn't include "Switch" in the name, they win a cookie.
what is your suggestion for a better name? again someone complaining about the name with no alternative. nobody has come up with a single name.However I am in complete disagreement that the name/branding is anything but an insane fiasco.
if you are saying they made a bad choice on the name, it is simple, just tell us the right name. this isn't making an entirely new system. your issue is with the name, which is bad. tell us a "good" name. if you can decide a name is bad, then you should be able to tell us what name is good. why is this so hard to do?Seriously, the consumer has to make up a better name (we don't work for Nintendo) or stay silent about the existing one? I suppose you say that about bad games too? If we can't make a better game we shouldn't comment it?
I see nothing wrong with the name. Its a switch with lesser features which fits into the moniker of being a lite version of the original.Maybe people call it tin foil but the people who sell it call it aluminum foil because calling it tin foil would be false.
Seriously, the consumer has to make up a better name (we don't work for Nintendo) or stay silent about the existing one? I suppose you say that about bad games too? If we can't make a better game we shouldn't comment it?
Seriously though, why are you asking us to come up with the name? It's not our job, just like it wasn't us who called it a Switch. And we're totally right to criticize this.what is your suggestion for a better name? again someone complaining about the name with no alternative. nobody has come up with a single name.
if you are saying they made a bad choice on the name, it is simple, just tell us the right name. this isn't making an entirely new system. your issue is with the name, which is bad. tell us a "good" name. if you can decide a name is bad, then you should be able to tell us what name is good. why is this so hard to do?
lol @ comparing it to making an entire game. i'm not asking that. i'm just asking for a name. this isn't a huge ask lol. if you have criticism you need to be able to articulate it. not just say "do it better". you can comment on it, but if you don't have a suggestion on how they could do it better, it's a useless comment.
Made the same exact point earlier.The Lite is mean to be a handheld only. Its designed to be a portable.
The Switch when it goes to dock/undocked it changes the clocks. You add a TV out and now the Lite needs to start switching clocks.
Also how would you even play this on your TV? You can't put it in the dock due to its design. Ok a USB wire? Sure then you get the complaints about the wire being not long enough, not included, too expensive or ugly just hanging off your TV. Oh ya and remember when the dock was scartching Switch screens? Well how many people will be happy with their switch hanging off their TV all exposed?
Then you have to add in joycons/pro controller since you can't detach the joycons. So anyone buying this will have to buy extra controllers to play on their TV.
So basically you take this 199$ product, add 80$ for Joy cons, and 50-90$ for a dock/wire or whatever to attach to your TV.
This is a handheld system, its like complaining the 3ds doesn't hook up to your 3dTV so you can play 3ds games in 3d on your 50 inch TV. If you want docking get the regular Switch. Thats why its there.
Yes they could of had TV out, but it takes away a selling point from the regular switch, muddies the handheld nature of the lite, and would add a bunch of extra costs and complaints for consumers along with having the lite still operate in 2 different modes.
I entirely agree that the product makes sense. In fact, I think they would be crazy not to have a $199 hardware for the market they created and fostered since Game Boy.
However I am in complete disagreement that the name/branding is anything but an insane fiasco.
The thing literally doesn't do what its name is. I don't care what anyone says, that's just ridiculous.
If they planned to potentially make new versions with the same software library, they should have come up with a new name, for example, Nintendo NX Switch. Then they could have NX Lite, NX TV, whatever. Not saying NX would be the best name but just to get my point across.
Now they have a software library bearing "Switch" so all hardware versions will need to use this name, regardless of whether they switch or not.
I thought they were on a roll in 2017 but it seems their marketing team didn't actually learn anything, they just actually showed up for work once WiiU was a mess and now it's back to the same ole' nonsense.
if you are saying they made a bad choice on the name, it is simple, just tell us the right name. this isn't making an entirely new system. your issue is with the name, which is bad. tell us a "good" name. if you can decide a name is bad, then you should be able to tell us what name is good. why is this so hard to do?
Being able to SWITCH how you play was the main focus of the Nintendo SWITCH.
Because of this, people were expecting the SWITCH Lite to do the same.
confusion. the current Switch is already portable, this would make parent think "is this other one not portable?" both Switches are portable, this one can't be docked. but you can't just say "Undocked Version"I do think they could have named this better. Instead of Nintendo Switch Light, why not Nintendo Switch Portable?
Honestly the way i see it, arguing the semantics of a handheld-only switch being a switch that doesnt switch sounds like nothing more than nit-picking. Hardware and software-wise its the same product minus tv ouput. If it was called a switch lite but couldnt play switch games at all then i would say the criticism is legit.Seriously though, why are you asking us to come up with the name? It's not our job, just like it wasn't us who called it a Switch. And we're totally right to criticize this.
The word 'Lite' isn't the issue here.Lite is easy, fast, people know it is a scaled down version. used across markets and industries. pretty simple.
Honestly the way i see it, arguing the semantics of a handheld-only switch being a switch that doesnt switch sounds like nothing more than nit-picking. Hardware and software-wise its the same product minus tv ouput. If it was called a switch lite but couldnt play switch games at all then i would say the criticism is legit.