Dude, every time I read your posts they seem to have some weird errors that makes me think if you actually know what you're talking about at all. Xbox One had DDR3 RAM, not GDDR3.
I'm not sure if Cerny even mentioned anything about "Virtual RAM", maybe he did, but he certainly wasn't talking about it like it was some
hot new shit like MS was talking about it.
Just because you can't see how having such a fast SSD combined with Sony's fast IO subsystem can't benefit graphics and what you see on screen doesn't mean anything, because you clearly have no interest in exploring the possibility that PS5 may indeed be a far more sophisticated and superior machine.
Have you ever heard of Radeon SSG (Solid State Graphics)? I suggest looking into if you haven't. Here a link for quick reference:
It's a $10k card, and it's not for gaming, but Sony's SSD solution is going for this exact concept and it's truly revolutionary in the console space. MS's solution is an attempt to fool everyone and compensate for the lack of RAM. Two totally different approaches.