• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Angry Joe being accused of sexual harassment

MayauMiao

Member
As predicted, they will never believe him regardless of his accuser walks back on her claim, now demanding canceling him.

v8AimK8.jpg



REEEEEEEEE!!!
 
Last edited:
S

SLoWMoTIoN

Unconfirmed Member
As predicted, they will never believe him regardless of his accuser walks back on her claim, now demanding canceling him.

v8AimK8.jpg



REEEEEEEEE!!!
This is extremely inaccurate! Guy is obviously not an incel. Pretty sure he had a gold digger gf b4.
 
According to these people, the accused should apologize and say "sorry" once the accuser makes an accusation, even if HE IS innocent. Innocents should NOT defend themselves, they should NOT silence fake accusations. Do they even use logic?

Well that's bullshit because apologizing is like blood in the water to these people, they'll just keep demanding more.

You literally can't win, so fuck them. Going on the offensive like Joe did was the right thing to do.
 

Rikoi

Member
Well that's bullshit because apologizing is like blood in the water to these people, they'll just keep demanding more.

You literally can't win, so fuck them. Going on the offensive like Joe did was the right thing to do.
Exactly. The only reason they want them to apologize is because they can easily CANCEL him because he ACCUSED HIMSELF.
If you say sorry you are basically saying "everything he/she said is TRUE", even if it's not true and you are innocent.
They don't want apologies, it's a trap.
People should NEVER apologize, and defend themself even taking legal actions.
 
Last edited:

TLZ

Banned
You know, the longer i post here, the more i start to wonder if people genuinely feel that way. I can't imagine too many situations in which someone who isn't a piece of shit calls someone else a retard for sharing an opinion in a public forum.

I've noticed alot of tag-play around here regarding "opinions". People can say whatever they want and nobody is able to take issue with it, until they do, at which point they're the victim, and you're an asshole for "assuming" things....Which is comical when the original comment is usually a very broad, very negative assumption about not a single person but entire groups and sometimes cultures of people.

People have this strange idea that fair freedom is the ability to say asshole things to anyone, yet cosmic law is supposed to protect them from people having anything to say about it....Cry and cry about how left-wing people are unnecessarily accusatory and hastily judgmental, yet choose to be unnecessarily inflammatory....and hastily judgmental. And then have the audacity to call people "Snowflakes". It's the most bitch-made philosophy i've interacted with.



There's a double-edged sword here, because lack of any real rules means it's really easy for topics to turn shitshow and never recover for it. But that's just up to what you perceive as a "shitshow".


That's just the thing though. GAF is no less of an echo chamber than Era is. Not by virtue of its moderation, but by it's lack of it.

I mean seriously lol, just look at how Era was formed. The far-left wingers got enraged over an issue, account-suicided, and left. There are left-wing people on this board but the forum is very clearly right leaning, at times very far right leaning.

It's because the counter-balance to GAF's political community all left. And now it's composed of people who literally just shit on Era and left-wing politics all day. It's literally the Anti-Era in here.

It's not that people with sensibilities opposite of GAF's aren't allowed to post.....it's that they're never gonna post here to begin with. GAF has already been labeled, and if they didn't know before they got here, it becomes EXTREMELY obvious within a few days of posting. I myself came back expecting a more central environment, but that is not what GAF is. It's identity is intrinsically linked with Era at this point and so is it's community.


If you think this place cultivates (or even embraces) opposing opinions just because you don't get expelled for having them, then i'm sorry to disappoint you. Lol communities don't work like that in real life, and they most certainly don't work like that on the internet with anonymity and lack of consequences.


Edit:

Regarding that game of tag i was referring to:



"Oh, I clearly know who you are enough to talk about your "consistent politics", so i'm present for all these conversations"

"but I don't see anything? People don't say mean shit to you, you just "interpret it wong " because of your "feelings" and "state of mind".


See? This is what i mean lol.

At least on Era when someone decides to call someone a piece of shit, they just fucking own it. The amount of timid tap dancing here is fucking ridiculous.

If nothing else, at least i can respect people like Brap or Tesseract for just being direct lol
Are you LordKano by any chance?
 
S

SLoWMoTIoN

Unconfirmed Member
You know, the longer i post here, the more i start to wonder if people genuinely feel that way. I can't imagine too many situations in which someone who isn't a piece of shit calls someone else a retard for sharing an opinion in a public forum.

I've noticed alot of tag-play around here regarding "opinions". People can say whatever they want and nobody is able to take issue with it, until they do, at which point they're the victim, and you're an asshole for "assuming" things....Which is comical when the original comment is usually a very broad, very negative assumption about not a single person but entire groups and sometimes cultures of people.

People have this strange idea that fair freedom is the ability to say asshole things to anyone, yet cosmic law is supposed to protect them from people having anything to say about it....Cry and cry about how left-wing people are unnecessarily accusatory and hastily judgmental, yet choose to be unnecessarily inflammatory....and hastily judgmental. And then have the audacity to call people "Snowflakes". It's the most bitch-made philosophy i've interacted with.



There's a double-edged sword here, because lack of any real rules means it's really easy for topics to turn shitshow and never recover for it. But that's just up to what you perceive as a "shitshow".


That's just the thing though. GAF is no less of an echo chamber than Era is. Not by virtue of its moderation, but by it's lack of it.

I mean seriously lol, just look at how Era was formed. The far-left wingers got enraged over an issue, account-suicided, and left. There are left-wing people on this board but the forum is very clearly right leaning, at times very far right leaning.

It's because the counter-balance to GAF's political community all left. And now it's composed of people who literally just shit on Era and left-wing politics all day. It's literally the Anti-Era in here.

It's not that people with sensibilities opposite of GAF's aren't allowed to post.....it's that they're never gonna post here to begin with. GAF has already been labeled, and if they didn't know before they got here, it becomes EXTREMELY obvious within a few days of posting. I myself came back expecting a more central environment, but that is not what GAF is. It's identity is intrinsically linked with Era at this point and so is it's community.


If you think this place cultivates (or even embraces) opposing opinions just because you don't get expelled for having them, then i'm sorry to disappoint you. Lol communities don't work like that in real life, and they most certainly don't work like that on the internet with anonymity and lack of consequences.


Edit:

Regarding that game of tag i was referring to:



"Oh, I clearly know who you are enough to talk about your "consistent politics", so i'm present for all these conversations"

"but I don't see anything? People don't say mean shit to you, you just "interpret it wong " because of your "feelings" and "state of mind".


See? This is what i mean lol.

At least on Era when someone decides to call someone a piece of shit, they just fucking own it. The amount of timid tap dancing here is fucking ridiculous.
My god man, do you get paid to say disingenuous shit for a living?

If nothing else, at least i can respect people like Brap
lol brap brap
 

Lunk

Member
I still rest it that the problem isn't that they did this, it's the overreaction to if the case happens to be true.

Yeah, you acted dominant, abusive of your status with someone who willingly or half-willingly went along with it... but you didn't rape them, you didn't physically hurt them, you didn't deliberately emotionally assault them... but public consensus these days is like: This behavior is a death sentence and now you must disappear from the public forever.

That's why I don't support MeToo or the "Believe Women" bullshit. Also, in the case that something might be exaggerated or an actual fabrication Believe Women is going to be the mantra of gaslighters. Any man who comes out to defend themselves against allegations of events no one saw is going to be guilty by consensus because that's where the tide is.

Maybe people should just stop fucking giving women a free pass for crying victimhood all the time.
 

Rikoi

Member
Maybe people should just stop fucking giving women a free pass for crying victimhood all the time.
Men hating men are the issue. Too many soy boys thinking they will get laid if they support the poor innocent (?) girl that was abused by the evil white male, even if she provides no proof at all, and even after the accusation proves to be false.

Just look at all these guys donating to twitch girls just because they breath and speak and don't even play games, humanity is hopeless.
 
Last edited:
New one was created for his response. Old one got buried 6 feet under.

Edit: Nvm it's still up there, I accidentally unwatched it.
Yeah I missed the new one that got made. There's a lot of loons but to my surprise it isn't 100% shitting on him. You can tell some of them are siding with him but they just leave a milquetoast "I don't know what to believe" response.
 

ShadowNate

Member
Oh, nice. Now let's see how fast the people who reached out for support, like ZQ, will hang her out to dry.

Like the assholes who rile up a protest then sneak the fuck out at the first sight of something going wrong.

Recetera thread deleted already. lol.
 

supernova8

Banned
So, no one else thinks that anything that he purportedly did was immoral?

She willingly went to his hotel room. She willingly stayed in the hotel room while he took a shower. She didn't tell him to stop putting his arm around her at the party.
She didn't say anything for two years?!

In other words, it's unfair to go along with things without saying anything and then get upset when the guy thinks you were 50/50 up for it.

If what he did is true, it makes him a bit of a sleazeball but to call him a sexual predator is way too far.
You could (almost) make the argument she was leading him on.

Basically, he's not a sexual predator and she wasn't leading him on.
 
Last edited:

killatopak

Gold Member
Why the fuck are all these sexual allegations just coming out right now? Like all at the same time frame?

Did these women felt left out because all the attention went towards the BLM movement and decided to get their share of the spotlight?
 

BluRayHiDef

Banned
It still blows my mind
She willingly went to his hotel room. She willingly stayed in the hotel room while he took a shower. She didn't tell him to stop putting his arm around her at the party.
She didn't say anything for two years?!

In other words, it's unfair to go along with things without saying anything and then get upset when the guy thinks you were 50/50 up for it.

If what he did is true, it makes him a bit of a sleazeball but to call him a sexual predator is way too far.
You could (almost) make the argument she was leading him on.

Basically, he's not a sexual predator and she wasn't leading him on.

1. She willingly went to his hotel room because he told her that he needed to quickly do something and then leave; he didn't tell her that he wanted her to take a shower with him and have sex. He brought her to his hotel room under false pretenses.

2. I concede about her not telling him to stop touching her at the party.

3. I never said that he's a sexual predator. Never. However, I have said that he is a deceiver and a manipulator. No one should use deception and manipulation in order to get someone to have sex with them; it's sleazy and immoral.
 

Mister Wolf

Gold Member
If she would have casually or upfront mentioned that she had a boyfriend then that would probably have been the end of her hanging out with Joe and any of the benefits that comes with that. I would like to think she isn't naive and understood that.
 

MiguelItUp

Member
Why the fuck are all these sexual allegations just coming out right now? Like all at the same time frame?

Did these women felt left out because all the attention went towards the BLM movement and decided to get their share of the spotlight?
I'm guessing so? I'm assuming the hashtag just picked up more speed.
 

supernova8

Banned
It still blows my mind


1. She willingly went to his hotel room because he told her that he needed to quickly do something and then leave; he didn't tell her that he wanted her to take a shower with him and have sex. He brought her to his hotel room under false pretenses.

2. I concede about her not telling him to stop touching her at the party.

3. I never said that he's a sexual predator. Never. However, I have said that he is a deceiver and a manipulator. No one should use deception and manipulation in order to get someone to have sex with them; it's sleazy and immoral.

1. As soon as he said he was going to take a shower she could have immediately got her things and left "I'll be waiting downstairs in the lobby". He was in the shower the whole time, for what, 20 minutes or more maybe? She sat there the whole time. I agree with the false pretense but doesn't change the fact she could've just left.

2. Glad we agree.

3. Yeah I wouldn't dispute him sounding a bit deceptive, manipulative but that's not (IMO) what she is arguing. Besides, going to a guy's hotel room when you have a boyfriend sound pretty... immoral... to me.
 
Last edited:

Aion002

Member
Wow... This Reset Era place is crazy.... According to her post: AJ gave her all the signs as soon as possible that he wanted to bang her, he invited her to his hotel, then gave an excuse to get her to his room and then invited her to go take a shower with him when they got there....

She dismissed and called him funny... If that was not a huge sign about his intentions maybe she needs a picture book or some shit to communicate with others....

She says that she didn't like the way he was acting, however, at all times she could just leave, she was not stranded in the woods or something ffs.

C'mon.... Or she is mentally challenged/has psychological problems or she also had some interest in him and changed her mind midway.... There's no story here, an adult tried awkwardly bang another adult, failed and that's it. It is baffling what some are trying to argue, while she probably was about to cheat on her boyfriend, but then got a cold feet.
 

Darth

Member
Fair statement.

Let's see if she gets the authorities involved in such a serious allegation.

Bet she won't though as she's back peddling already.


She’s not going to do shit. She already backpedalled her ass. Far more people have now heard of her which Might have been her goal.

I’m guessing most people who know who Angry Joe is had no clue as to who she is.
 

Darth

Member
Yeah I missed the new one that got made. There's a lot of loons but to my surprise it isn't 100% shitting on him. You can tell some of them are siding with him but they just leave a milquetoast "I don't know what to believe" response.

Well because even those types of responses were banable in the first thread. It is exactly how the Jussie threads played out as well.
 
in his livestream just now, someone donated an extremely large amount to him that "he has never had that much donated before" But I missed how much it was. 5000? wow.
 
Last edited:

iHaunter

Member
She even back-pedaled and said he never assaulted her. She led him on trying to increase her channel. Who constantly gets hit on and never states they have a boyfriend?

She was the predator first.

EbPFWl1XgAAkBiF
 
Last edited:

NoxNyctores

Member
As predicted, they will never believe him regardless of his accuser walks back on her claim, now demanding canceling him.

v8AimK8.jpg



REEEEEEEEE!!!
I'd ask someone to wake me up when Resetera changes anything, but then I realized we would be extinct before anything happens
 

Nydus

Member
You know, the longer i post here, the more i start to wonder if people genuinely feel that way. I can't imagine too many situations in which someone who isn't a piece of shit calls someone else a retard for sharing an opinion in a public forum.

I've noticed alot of tag-play around here regarding "opinions". People can say whatever they want and nobody is able to take issue with it, until they do, at which point they're the victim, and you're an asshole for "assuming" things....Which is comical when the original comment is usually a very broad, very negative assumption about not a single person but entire groups and sometimes cultures of people.

People have this strange idea that fair freedom is the ability to say asshole things to anyone, yet cosmic law is supposed to protect them from people having anything to say about it....Cry and cry about how left-wing people are unnecessarily accusatory and hastily judgmental, yet choose to be unnecessarily inflammatory....and hastily judgmental. And then have the audacity to call people "Snowflakes". It's the most bitch-made philosophy i've interacted with.



There's a double-edged sword here, because lack of any real rules means it's really easy for topics to turn shitshow and never recover for it. But that's just up to what you perceive as a "shitshow".


That's just the thing though. GAF is no less of an echo chamber than Era is. Not by virtue of its moderation, but by it's lack of it.

I mean seriously lol, just look at how Era was formed. The far-left wingers got enraged over an issue, account-suicided, and left. There are left-wing people on this board but the forum is very clearly right leaning, at times very far right leaning.

It's because the counter-balance to GAF's political community all left. And now it's composed of people who literally just shit on Era and left-wing politics all day. It's literally the Anti-Era in here.

It's not that people with sensibilities opposite of GAF's aren't allowed to post.....it's that they're never gonna post here to begin with. GAF has already been labeled, and if they didn't know before they got here, it becomes EXTREMELY obvious within a few days of posting. I myself came back expecting a more central environment, but that is not what GAF is. It's identity is intrinsically linked with Era at this point and so is it's community.


If you think this place cultivates (or even embraces) opposing opinions just because you don't get expelled for having them, then i'm sorry to disappoint you. Lol communities don't work like that in real life, and they most certainly don't work like that on the internet with anonymity and lack of consequences.


Edit:

Regarding that game of tag i was referring to:



"Oh, I clearly know who you are enough to talk about your "consistent politics", so i'm present for all these conversations"

"but I don't see anything? People don't say mean shit to you, you just "interpret it wong " because of your "feelings" and "state of mind".


See? This is what i mean lol.

At least on Era when someone decides to call someone a piece of shit, they just fucking own it. The amount of timid tap dancing here is fucking ridiculous.

If nothing else, at least i can respect people like Brap or Tesseract for just being direct lol
Eh. Yeah the forum is sometimes a bit too right for my licking but most of the time it's just some wannabee Neonazi trying to get a rageboner. Ignore them, bait them or strait up just fight them. Since they can't be openly racist/hateful (even on gaf) they will stfu quickly. What really bothers me is the amount of US politics and it's lingo/culture forcing it's way in every thread. (And yeah I get it, 90% US people here)
 
That's why I despise ERA. Fucking world is not black and white. Makes me sick.


It's so creepy that you have to have some sort of paid for email in order to have an account there, and then one ban is a perma ip ban. It's also creepy how everyone can see what you were modded for right there in the topic, even if you no longer have an account at the site.
 
d in the last few days they're gonna need to see a doctor for the n
way I'm fucking reading that whole thing, it's like a fucking
l... other then the fact that Postmodernism originated from the French and that Karl Marx is German.
As predicted, they will never believe him regardless of his accuser walks back on her claim, now demanding canceling him.

v8AimK8.jpg



REEEEEEEEE!!!
they already hate him enough for not liking the last of us part 2 . so yeah i would'nt be surprised if they cancel him from their forum .
 
Top Bottom