We are aware that historically MS gave them access, way more than Sony did and that comes with strings attached from pre-release HW (you know those NDA’s that say you should refrain from making negative remarks that could position the product under a bad light, etc...).
One company is giving them pre-release exclusive access and the other one is not... IMHO it shows in Leadbetter’s reporting even if it were only for the fact that they cannot afford to be cut off from MS/lose access... another bit could be personal inclination and it might be a bunch of things contributing tothe “good news or bad news tempered by hope and positivity as a future outlook” vs “bad news or good news tempered by a but/cynical outlook casting some doubt on the whole thing” reporting they have done on XSX and PS5 since the first rumours started (see how they deal with the PS5 has software RT for so long as they did).
They did plenty of videos on a lot less quality material than the PS5 official teardown and they did plenty of reaction videos.
Not bothering to appear professional and impartial in public (Battaglia’s “uninteresting” adjective on a public popular forum is not helping him) at this point is also odd yet telling.
Both companies send the consoles to influencers and/or people that could only highlight positive aspects or neutral aspects of the console, but you are free to point out the tons of details you get in XSX’s teardown by Leadbetter because he does it that you could not get from either Sony’s video or
NXGamer
coverage of it.
DF - XSX teardown
Sony’s PS5 teardown
NXGamer PS5 teardown coverage