But how many places actually give different scores based off of platform, regardless of technical difficulties?My only problem with OpenCritic is that it gathers all reviews regardless of the platform, sometimes a game will run poorly one one platform resulting in score taking a hit.
In this case Metacritic is more reliable, otherwise i like how Opencritic is designed more.
Opencritic is more like Rottentomatoes.
I think Cyberpunk situation is a good example. PS4 scores were 4/10 and 3/10, and PC scores were 8 or 9 out of 10.But how many places actually give different scores based off of platform, regardless of technical difficulties?
Ok, fair enough. But, that was an extremely drastic case.I think Cyberpunk situation is a good example. PS4 scores were 4/10 and 3/10, and PC scores were 8 or 9 out of 10.
Its undeserved to merge them together. Although they did put a notice in the main page, now its over and its taken down, and the bad score remains.
Edit: Actually the notice is still there, lol.
The worst are the dipshits who don't even play a game and belittle others who enjoy it because it didn't get the highest ratings. I've played some great games that got low averages and people will talk shit about it because the "critics" gave it low ratings. But then you asked the same people if they actually played the game and no. You can rely on reviews for guidance if you want, but don't be a braindead cunt who lets others do the thinking for you.Neither. Both are fucking retarded.
People need to stop relying on these mindless cunts and instead focus on cultivating their own ability to do research. Watch gameplay, see demos and trailers, maybe a couple twitch/YouTubers who you can somewhat trust to provide a good overview of what works/doesn’t work/is in the game.
The worst are the dipshits who don't even play a game and belittle others who enjoy it because it didn't get the highest ratings. I've played some great games that got low averages and people will talk shit about it because the "critics" gave it low ratings. But then you asked the same people if they actually played the game and no. You can rely on reviews for guidance if you want, but don't be a braindead cunt who lets others do the thinking for you.
That's so true. Like are you playing a game or do you play review scores? Sites like Metacritic are nothing but an approx. based on a bunch of critic scores.The worst are the dipshits who don't even play a game and belittle others who enjoy it because it didn't get the highest ratings
Gamerankings also had slightly stricter criteria too I think than both these 2.Gamerankings.com
Game rankings, gamefaqs, and nintendophiles made up a large part of my childhood.
Me too, as soon as you say something, I'm ready to jump off the bridge.Gymwolf critic.
user reviews = shitOpencritic = no user reviews = shit