blitzcloud
Banned
It most likely is. Urvan is a joke character, he said it himself
Then i'm cool with it. We need these stereotype joke posters for the sake of humor.
It most likely is. Urvan is a joke character, he said it himself
Kamiya had nothing to do with that. So much for Kamiya failing huh?
Kamiya had nothing to do with that. So much for Kamiya failing huh?
if this rip-off is going to be like what uncharted did to tomb raider, then I am all for it.
Er I meant the game had his backing. He has stated plenty of times he was excited about it. Seems contradictory to what he is saying now though..
Or like what crash team racing did to MK64.
Aka story mode, better controls, overall more fun.
Or like what crash team racing did to MK64.
Aka story mode, better controls, overall more fun.
If this gets archived, I'm happy that I manage to participate in one.
Well of course he would, they're made by his colleagues. That doesn't really affect what he said though.
And I'd rather not pull a Godwin's Law.
Or like what crash team racing did to MK64.
Aka story mode, better controls, overall more fun.
wait...did ctr come first or did diddy king racers?
No it's wrong! you people live on by what we produce, you were born from a failed experiment that was made by Nintendo, you are like Frankenstein of gaming, you live on because Sony steal ideas from Nintendo and make it out like they never did, Super Smash bros is only the latest to the list, you did a Mario Clone, a Zelda Clone, Mario Kart clone (several),F-Zero clone,Fire Emblem Clone, you stole Final Fantasy, you stole every good franchise from Nintendo, Sony fans and developers are like Leeches on this industry, atleast be classy like Sega and Microsoft (that doesn't prove I like them either).
Red Hot Rumble is nothing like Smash Bros. beyond being 2D and four players.
Diddy king racers came first.
wait...did ctr come first or did diddy king racers?
It does not matter that that the game was made by his colleagues. The fact is he is a hypocrite and considering he has not even played the game that plays nothing like Smash and arrived at the conclusion he did makes him an idiot.
If that is nothing like Smash Bros then neither is All Stars.
Didn't we all know it was a rip off months ago?
SHOCKING NEWS!
If that is nothing like Smash Bros then neither is All Stars.
Are you serious? Inaba himself has stated that the game was inspired by Smash Bros. How can you not see it...
Do you honestly not see how All Stars is a Smash Bros rip-off? It's a 2.5D mascot brawler with similar stage design and combat. Just because the fighting mechanics are slightly different does not mean the game isn't a rip-off.
Pikmin was inspired by Miyamoto picking carrots but the game doesn't make me feel like I'm actually picking carrots.
Inspiration doesn't always mean copy cat design or imitation.
I don't know if it's been discussed at length, but could it have anything to do with a Western developer handling a Smash clone?
I don't know if it's been discussed at length, but could it have anything to do with a Western developer handling a Smash clone?
Do you honestly not see how All Stars is a Smash Bros rip-off? It's a 2.5D mascot brawler with similar stage design and combat. Just because the fighting mechanics are slightly different does not mean the game isn't a rip-off.
Limited how? The way I see it, PASBR has a genuine advantage over SSB via its roster, which can realistically feature a cast of 30+ first-party fighters without having to resort to clones or secondary characters wasting space. I don't know whether Superbot are going to adhere to the 1-character/1-IP rule - it's hard to say right now if Evil Cole has his own slot or not - but it would really showcase the Playstation's diverse brand history if they do.-
I would not have minded this tweet that much if it was coming from a dev who actually backed what he was saying. Not only did he not play it to realize it plays nothing like Smash the fact that it is also coming from a dev who was all praises for the epic fail known as Viewtiful Joe Red Hot Rumble and has the audacity to say what he did with a straight face is lol worthy.
Nintendo or Bandai? Nintendo copied bandai! How shameless.
I think my point was pretty easy to understand, but I'll try to make it even clearer. Those games aren't even remotely comparable.
I don't see what Miis have anything to do with it, because it has Miis it's suddenly completely different? The controller is only there because it's needed for the motion controls so again, not sure what your point is.
Are you serious? Inaba himself has stated that the game was inspired by Smash Bros. How can you not see it...
Inspired not stripped..and it looks like they are cooperatively playing.Are you serious? Inaba himself has stated that the game was inspired by Smash Bros. How can you not see it...
It is definitely inspired by Smash just like many brawler fighters that came before it. Just like tons of FPS that came after Wolf 3D were inspired by Wolf 3D. It is in no way a rip off.
Are you saying Kamiya is a racist?!
I'm not getting the game, but I appreciate that its coming out, smash brothers improved on the fighters megamix formula by adding 2 extra players total and a sinple system, Sony's game seems to be improving the forula by taking out the silly stuff (tripping foes, ring outs to win) and towing the line between true a fighter and a party game better than Smash Brothers..
If Kamiya wants to hate, let him, but burning bridges with an entire company because you're riding the phallus of another is bad form, if it was Sony copying a game he worked on, I'd understand, but so soon after the reveal of his new family friendly nintendo exclusive is too suspect to take seriously.
I'm not getting the game, but I appreciate that its coming out, smash brothers improved on the fighters megamix formula by adding 2 extra players total and a sinple system, Sony's game seems to be improving the forula by taking out the silly stuff (tripping foes, ring outs to win) and towing the line between true a fighter and a party game better than Smash Brothers..
If Kamiya wants to hate, let him, but burning bridges with an entire company because you're riding the phallus of another is bad form, if it was Sony copying a game he worked on, I'd understand, but so soon after the reveal of his new family friendly nintendo exclusive is too suspect to take seriously.
If Kamiya wants to hate, let him, but burning bridges with an entire company because you're riding the phallus of another is bad form, if it was Sony copying a game he worked on, I'd understand, but so soon after the reveal of his new family friendly nintendo exclusive is too suspect to take seriously.
The funniest part of all these debates is that this game will be lucky to ship a million copies worldwide. No one give a shit about Sony characters and the few that do dot want to play a mascot brawler.
I think this cuts right to why the debate -- if you're personally not invested in praising/deriding either Nintendo or Sony -- is laborious. Words like 'imitation', 'inspiration', 'ripoff', etc. get thrown around almost interchangeably by different users who seem to have different intentions when using them to the point where the discussion becomes entirely meaningless.
Is the game a ripoff in the literal sense? Is it just superficially similar while innovating? Does this even matter at all when subjectively evaluating its worth? I don't know. All I know is that when the debate just seems to boil down into establishing whether it's a ripoff or whether it's merely inspired by a certain game, we're clearly just meandering in semantics.
The funniest part of all these debates is that this game will be lucky to ship a million copies worldwide. No one give a shit about Sony characters and the few that do dot want to play a mascot brawler.
The funniest part of all these debates is that this game will be lucky to ship a million copies worldwide. No one give a shit about Sony characters and the few that do dot want to play a mascot brawler.
Honestly, why, as a consumer, would anyone be concerned with whether Playstation All Stars is a ripoff or not? If you loved Smash Bros., wouldn't you be happy that someone else was doing another game of the exact same/very similar style? The only thing I can think of is console warriors trying to score some points at the expense of the other side. Let Nintendo worry about the lawsuits, focus instead on playing the kinds of game you like [whether the logo on the box is Sony's or Nintendo's].
And if Playstation All Stars turns out to be a terrible ripoff, just don't play it.
The funniest part of all these debates is that this game will be lucky to ship a million copies worldwide. No one give a shit about Sony characters and the few that do dot want to play a mascot brawler.
I agree to a certain extent. But ripoff and inspired are clearly completely different things and not just mere semantics. To make a movie analogy clearly Kurosawa's Rashamon multiple narrative technique and seven samurai inspired hundreds of western movies. But clearly there is a difference between the one's that are genuinely inspired and ones being direct ripoff's. The problem with using the word ripoff is it has a negative association of being something cheap and inferior to the original work. An inspiration is something which influences a piece of work but is special in its own way. I love Smash and I would have been happy if Superbot just copied Smash but after playing the beta I realized that it plays nothing like Smash. You just cannot play the game like Smash or most fighters for that matter. Clearly I see the inspiration but at the same time I see that it is its own special beast in a way. At least that is the way I see it...
I'm not getting the game, but I appreciate that its coming out, smash brothers improved on the fighters megamix formula by adding 2 extra players total and a sinple system, Sony's game seems to be improving the forula by taking out the silly stuff (tripping foes, ring outs to win) and towing the line between true a fighter and a party game better than Smash Brothers..
If Kamiya wants to hate, let him, but burning bridges with an entire company because you're riding the phallus of another is bad form, if it was Sony copying a game he worked on, I'd understand, but so soon after the reveal of his new family friendly nintendo exclusive is too suspect to take seriously.
I migth be in the minority but I love ring outs and the lack of this feature is a bit of a downer, on the other hand, tripping will not be missed
I agree to a certain extent. But ripoff and inspired are clearly completely different things and not just mere semantics. To make a movie analogy clearly Kurosawa's Rashamon multiple narrative technique and seven samurai inspired hundreds of western movies. But clearly there is a difference between the one's that are genuinely inspired and ones being direct ripoff's. The problem with using the word ripoff is it has a negative association of being something cheap and inferior to the original work. An inspiration is something which influences a piece of work but is special in its own way. I love Smash and I would have been happy if Superbot just copied Smash but after playing the beta I realized that it plays nothing like Smash. You just cannot play the game like Smash or most fighters for that matter. Clearly I see the inspiration but at the same time I see that it is its own special beast in a way. At least that is the way I see it...