Make another shitty Halo game?
Halo 4 was great. And now?
Make another shitty Halo game?
I'm not to call out but I would like to know where were you around that time. I would like to see some classics forum or something like that. Classic troll post etc... To see how the internet world has changed.
That time, I was totally PC gaming in all PS2 era.
Old Gaming age forum, is hardy to track.
Since you are a fan of logic, it seems the Wii U is the PS2 in your scenario. The PS4 and 720 are the GC and Xbox. But you are not using logic, you are just picking a scenario where the weaker system dominated and are wedging future consoles into said scenario.
Sadly your logic and reasoning will mostly be ignore here at GAF.
Kinect as a required attachment is a huge turn off to many even though there's no sign that we'll be required to use it with navigation or even gameplay. That's a perfect example to how something that could be irrelevant is potentially a major issue here.
The specs matter to me since I don't have much investment in 1st party titles. I love them like any other gamer, but I don't love them any more than 3rd party titles, which I play more of. So in this respect, specs matter to me since the better specced machine is likely to have the better 3rd party version multi-platform titles. I'm sure the KZs and Halos will look gorgeous on their respective systems.
That said, IMO it looks like MS is purposely trying to be the PS2 of the next generation. Providing a system that's "good enough" with providing a decent performance leap, capable at handling multi-platform titles without specs being a major bottleneck, but not concerning themselves with providing the best version possible for the additional cost that it would take. The vast majority of gamers didn't care last gen that most 3rd party titles looked and ran better on the xbox, just like many gamers didn't care that most 3rd party titles looked and/or ran better on the 360 this gen. So it seems like MS is banking on this ignorance to show through again next gen and hope the majority of gamers don't care about the minor differences between the PS4 and Durango. If any of this is true, I think it's amusing that many of the people here so quick to dismiss Durango may also be the same people who think the PS2 is one of the best systems in history, regardless of the specs.
MS are making a gamble and it may or may not pay off for them. It'll be interesting to see how it turns out.
Make another shitty Halo game?
I think the whole deal about specs is that they sort of serve as a letter of intent. Same goes for OS memory reservations, requirement of an add on that doesn't fundamentally change the content, pay walls and types of video games being produced for the system.
It's not that the gamers more invested in consoles, which make a huge chunk of gaming side btw, only care about the specs. Sure fanboys will always pull a high five if the specs are better, but the problem is that overall the leaks and the rumors point to a system that isn't designed with them 1st. And that has been the whole point of consoles thus far, gamers first.
If Sony came out with a PS4 that wasn't being built for gamers first, it would get the same reaction.
The whole picture isn't about pixel counting, it's about the concept itself and the compromises made.
Make another shitty Halo game?
Pretty much.
Apparently, MS replaced the OG gaming guys who made the 360 with more blue ocean/business kind of guys for Durango (according to Pacther). The PS4 architect, Mark Cerny, is a game developer. So it looks from the outside, to a dilettante like me, that PS4 is going to be more game console and less media hub than Durango.
Whether that is a good thing depends entirely on what the customer wants.
I'm glad there is going to be some differentiation next gen. Too bad Nintendo is out of the race already.
It's not the hardcore gamers jumping onto smartphones and tablets... It's everyone else! Everyone else is discovering that they don't need a fancy computer or console to play games or surf the internet when they can instead do it on their tablet or smartphone. The cellphone is pretty much a device everyone has to have at this point and you can get a free Android smartphone with a two-year contract.
Even I have a cellphone at this point and I'm generally the most anti-phone person I know. I also have an Android tablet. However, since I actually like the PC and don't like using portable devices, I'll probably continue using a pure PC as long as I can and only switch to a nice tablet only when market realities dictate it... and even then, I'd just use the tablet as if it were a PC. Unlike most of you, I actually did have a touchscreen PC back in 2002 and almost never used the touch features that it had, so I actually have some reason to not return to having a touchscreen on my PC again.
As for consoles, I will probably continue buying them even if I stopped being a serious gamer because of the fact that they play DVDs and Blu-Rays and will continue to have streaming services on them.
Pretty much.
Apparently, MS replaced the OG gaming guys who made the 360 with more blue ocean/business kind of guys for Durango (according to Pacther). The PS4 architect, Mark Cerny, is a game developer. So it looks from the outside, to a dilettante like me, that PS4 is going to be more game console and less media hub than Durango.
Whether that is a good thing depends entirely on what the customer wants.
I'm glad there is going to be some differentiation next gen. Too bad Nintendo is out of the race already.
I think the whole deal about specs is that they sort of serve as a letter of intent. Same goes for OS memory reservations, requirement of an add on that doesn't fundamentally change the content, pay walls and types of video games being produced for the system.
It's not that the gamers more invested in consoles, which make a huge chunk of gaming side btw, only care about the specs. Sure fanboys will always pull a high five if the specs are better, but the problem is that overall the leaks and the rumors point to a system that isn't designed with them 1st. And that has been the whole point of consoles thus far, gamers first.
If Sony came out with a PS4 that wasn't being built for gamers first, it would get the same reaction.
The whole picture isn't about pixel counting, it's about the concept itself and the compromises made.
does not mean that even though led by those guys that they kicked all the game guys out of the room for every meeting.
the next machine will play games, all of the same mp games PS4 will play in fact, along with 1st party ip's as usual.
Gemüsepizza;51478464 said:This seems to be their way of thinking. People will love the new Xbox, it plays Halo and Call of Duty! We have checked this box! Not sure if this is enough, when there will be another console which also has very strong first party exclusives and which can probably play all those mp games with better graphics/worlds.
Yes but do any of you people understand that CONSOLE GAMES ARE ON A DIFFERENT SCALE TO PHONE GAMES and offer a HELL of a lot different experience and depth in the games, even online gaming is more or less not even present on your precious phone games.
Seriously, do you just say "cell phones will ruin the consoles" without looking at the fact that console games are, you know ACTUAL FULL GAMES and not some flashy flash game that lasts like 10 minutes and so simple...
Lets not even talk about the touch screen problem with gaming.
Are you telling me people would pick the iOS and android games over games like GTA, fifa, COD/BF, FF etc on the console?
Maybe in a few years when these devices can produce games even near the scale of ps3/360 ( even the original xbox) games you can start this stupid argument but until then just stop.
It boggles my mind how people even start comparing the games on the iOS and andriod to consoles game.
The devs are given details and the PC they use is on par to what the console manufacturer will be using in Dev kits until they go final. Wth are you carrying on about wrong architecture?Nope - not for a different architecture. And basically devs always make games for the wrong architecture in the beginning of a new console gen as alpha devkits a pretty much just PCs.
Yeah....that's why most gamers buy gaming consoles, not for the games but for the services.
Yeah....that's why most gamers buy gaming consoles, not for the games but for the services.
So this is where you go when you don't have anything intelligent to say?
Wait, i know how this game goes--you'll compare him to Hitler next.
Due to about 90% of the games on the next gen consoles more than likely being the same, the differences in services between the Next Xbox and PS4 are going to matter just as much as, if not more than, the game exclusives that both consoles have. Especially when you look at the activity of what many people are playing -- many people are playing multiplatform games... especially people who only have (or can afford) one console.
But some if not most of those services are available on many different platforms. MS has to make some of those services exclusive, given the pay wall requirements. Being the conduit for those services really isn't that special.
Give an example of a current service that's unique to LIVE? One that is compelling and ground breaking. (genuinely interested)
It's about the games. It's always about the games.
While both are going for services in the same areas, it's looking as if MS is going to have a lot of tricks up its sleeve for next gen.
I'm expecting some big announcements for media content/services as well as unique online gaming/social features that may not be found anywhere else. Heck, they already have ESPN which is probably the biggest reason/channel that's keeping people to stay with cable.
Anyway, look at the huge change in Xbox Live from Xbox (1) to Xbox 360. That was massive. I don't see why it would be faulty to expect the same amount of change and improvements this time around for the Next Xbox.
MS has more experience in these things than Sony does. That's not to say that the PS4 won't have good services though.
Watch ESPN is not unique to Xbox - I can do that elsewhere, using an app for example, it's not a unique compelling service feature. It's not on PS3, but it's on competing platforms, that are not games consoles.
If only the PS4 had a 360 style controller.
Made these to help visualize the difference between the DS3:
What's interesting is how further apart the dpad and PS buttons are from each other, same with the analog sticks. I guess that's to address the issue big-handed people have when steering the left stick to the right while pushing the right stick to the left (thumbs bump into each other and cause slippage).
The triggers are obviously more trigger-shaped and angular, but they're also actually closer to the L1/R1 buttons in the sense of where you'd be resting your fingers on them. Speaking of L1/R1, they're much larger. It's not illustrated too well in the gif due to the angle, but the fact that it's an oval shape might make pressing it a bit easier.
Now the most significant change is obviously the grips. What the've done is reduce the angle of the dive that each grip takes from the main body, and at the same time made each grip wider/longer in doing so.
Can't wait to get my hands on one, or at least hear some impressions from E3. As far as I can tell, it's an excellent evolution of the DualShock.
It's a pretty stark improvement.
Watch ESPN is not unique to Xbox - I can do that elsewhere, using an app for example, it's not a unique compelling service feature. It's not on PS3, but it's on competing platforms, that are not games consoles.
All the video services are that way. If I'm a casual user interested in those services, why go to the expense of getting an Xbox 360 over a Roku or my Samsung TV.
Some slick UI and tricks won't be enough. Unless it cheap. Very cheap.
The one thing my TV, Roku can not do is play games. But do the people interested in these services want to play games?
How do we Kinect them to more than just services? Oh....
It's all about the games. I expect Kinect and traditional gaming to be at the core of experience with services augmenting the experience. But they'll have to get creative with the pricing - Subscription offsetting the unit cost?
During college football and basketball season my friends list is full of people using this app. On what other devices is it available other than phones and computers? It sure isnt available on any other gaming console.
IPad has it.
Does anyone think MS isn't going with blu-ray? Just curious.
Does anyone think MS isn't going with blu-ray? Just curious.
was there ever a good wireless one with 360 stick placement for the ps3?It is the analog stick placement I'm more concerned with, maybe a third party will make one.
Absolutely no chance.
So DVD or download only?
Absolutely no chance they're NOT going with Blu-ray.
So 100% chance Durango games will be on Blu-ray at retail.
its probably bundling blurayAbsolutely no chance they're NOT going with Blu-ray.
So 100% chance Durango games will be on Blu-ray at retail.
During college football and basketball season my friends list is full of people using this app. On what other devices is it available other than phones and computers? It sure isnt available on any other gaming console.
It is the analog stick placement I'm more concerned with, maybe a third party will make one.
Your missing the point. I never said unique to consoles. I said unique period. It's not unique to Xbox. It's a service that can be used elsewhere.
It's also a poor service to put forward as an example, given it's a sports only service limited to events that ESPN has the rights to cover and requires a compatible ISP to use. A great deal of Xbox users in the US can't even use the service, not to mention those outside of the US.
What are these magical services we'll be getting through the next Xbox, I wonder? The media deals MS will have to make are too protracted to have sweeping impact. Unless MS can do what nobody has done before. Get the Media content providers to bend to their will.
Absolutely no chance they're NOT going with Blu-ray.
So 100% chance Durango games will be on Blu-ray at retail.
Its not unique to Xbox but since you cannot use the service on anything else other than phones and computers its a pretty big deal for the 360. See here in the US people like to watch college football, and they like to watch college football on big screen tvs not on computers. So the fact that the service can be used on a 5 inch phone is irrelevant when it comes to the majority of people interested in that content.
You discount the service because to you a sports only service isnt really that great. But im telling you as a sports fan a lot of people love that service. For many non-powerhouse schools Watch ESPN is the only way fans can even see their team play. I have seen many instances where people have bought 360s specifically to use that app.
If only the PS4 had a 360 style controller.
Having two of the best selling games in the industry now is "checking a box"? Oh good lord the goal posts be moving!
The devs are given details and the PC they use is on par to what the console manufacturer will be using in Dev kits until they go final. Wth are you carrying on about wrong architecture?