Nope.
Vita has 2 player (requires 2 Vitas) co-op. it plays like the WiiU version.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXlsVfpuL0w
Does the Vita have all online modes though? Or does this game not have online modes on any console?
Nope.
Vita has 2 player (requires 2 Vitas) co-op. it plays like the WiiU version.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXlsVfpuL0w
German mag M! Games has a review as well. 88% on Wii U, 87% on PS3/360. The reason for the difference is the good Wii U Pad integration for the Murfy stuff.
Does the Vita have all online modes though? Or does this game not have online modes on any console?
And people on here wonder why many devs don't support PC gaming that well. If your in no rush to buy the game, their in no rush to put it on PC
So nothing wrong with the game but it was just too hard for you. Gotcha.I certainly wasn't.
It stopped being fun when it started throwing in too many levels that rely on memorization and shitty shmup stages.
So wait, it's multiplayer centric with no online for PC? Lame. As. Fuck.
Waiting for a Steam sale is justified for such a lazy port.
just curious but is there any graphical deifferences between the wii u version and the ps360 versions?
German mag M! Games has a review as well. 88% on Wii U, 87% on PS3/360. The reason for the difference is the good Wii U Pad integration for the Murfy stuff.
Did they review the Vita version?
There's no online co-op on any platform. You can retract your pitchfork now.
Rayman Origins was possibly the greatest platformer of this generation, and Legends trumps it in every way. It's that simple. Admittedly, Rayman as a platform icon has 18 years of history under his belt, which is a lifetime in terms of games, but that age is barely notable. Few games ever become as refreshing as this one.
Any lag would completely destroy the experience, especially harder levels where you really need to perform flawlessly to succeed.Oh, ok. Still seems somewhat lazy not to include such a feature in 2013 :L
Any lag would completely destroy the experience, especially harder levels where you really need to perform flawlessly to succeed.
Getting the superior Vita version.
I'm still so torn on what version to get. For me, it's either between the Wii U version or the PS3 version. Because the game started out as a Wii U title, I feel like it's the most natural format to play the game on, especially because of the pad features. On the other hand, I've been playing Rayman since the original on Playstation and I own most of the franchise on Sony platforms. Don't know what to do... =/
mario and luigi costumes dude
just saying
Not sure if Steam or Vita.
Steam sales for me.
There's no online co-op on any platform. You can retract your pitchfork now.
I'm still so torn on what version to get. For me, it's either between the Wii U version or the PS3 version. Because the game started out as a Wii U title, I feel like it's the most natural format to play the game on, especially because of the pad features. On the other hand, I've been playing Rayman since the original on Playstation and I own most of the franchise on Sony platforms. Don't know what to do... =/
There aren't any online multiplayer/co-op features at all?!
B-b-but I thought online multiplayer in a 2D platformer is a no-brainer and only Nintendo would be backwards enough to not put it in their games?There is no online multiplayer in any version. The best you get are ghosts that show up during Challenges.
Both versions cost about the same and the Wii U version has more multiplayer-content (Murfy is playable by one of the players) and more singleplayer content (each Murfy-level can be completed either as Rayman or as Murfy, making them effectively two levels on the Wii U version). If it was PSV or Wii U I could understand the dilemma, but PS3 vs. Wii U is really not a question imo.
So the game is only good enough to play if it's a mere fill-in during a drought?Would have bought in November. Would have bought in February.
There is no online multiplayer in any version. The best you get are ghosts that show up during Challenges.
So the game is only good enough to play if it's a mere fill-in during a drought?
Its Waylon, he thinks hes entitled to something and Ubisoft has personally wronged him by delaying a piece of entertainment.So the game is only good enough to play if it's a mere fill-in during a drought?
Weird that this post is getting so much hate. Whatever you buy it on sale for will still give Ubisoft more money than if you bought it used. Plus, that money is more valuable as you won't be able to resell it in the future.Steam sales for me.
Its Waylon, he thinks hes entitled to something and Ubisoft has personally wronged him by delaying a piece of entertainment.
Why he still posts about it is beyond me, the games out in a week youd think hed have moved on already.
Yes! The reason for the Origins levels was for Wii U owners who may have never played Origins.Doesnt the Wii U version also contain Origins levels as well?