Putting characters in thongs and skirts is the opposite of what I would call "creative".
It's actually what I would call "lazy".
The characters in Bravely Default look like children.
In the Japanese release these children are dressed up in sexy outfits for some situations.
The western release changed it so it's less obviously sexual.
It seems pretty cut and dried to me. if you're against this change (NOT censorship) then you want children in sexy outfits.
Do you have certain criteria for these labels or is it just because you like/dislike something?
Fair enough, but I wouldn't want devs to adjust their games to what causes the smallest controversy but to be more concerned about what players want or don't want. And having both available would be the best solution for players.Having the option there didn't avoid one shred of controversy.
This is a good thing. The whole giving young characters less revealing (still skimpy though!) clothing and bumping their age up a bit
Square Enix themselves might have localized it in just that way.I just want to know where all this talk about the "Developer" is censoring this game so it's not censorship is coming from. It's not the developer that is censoring the game, it's the publisher NINTENDO that is censoring the game which the last time I checked didn't have a hand in making it . Say and feel whatever you want about this issue, it doesn't change the fact that is indeed very much censorship.
I am more than ok with thiTHEY ARE 15 YEARS OLD, PEOPLE. I'm sorry 15. That's just... no. I don't criticize the art itself, but no. I would not buy this game, if they were 15 years old.
Because they felt like it?
This is coming from the guy with an avatar of a little girl wearing a belly dancer's outfit.
It seems pretty cut and dried to me. if you're against this change (NOT censorship) then you want children in sexy outfits.
If you're against this change, you are supporting sexualizing children.
I think they should've only done one of the two.
Either let them be skimpy 18 year olds (becase those don't exist in the real world!) or censor the 15 year old models. Doing both is overkill imo.
They are drawings.
so? my love for the character comes from how much I liked her gameplay wise.
Dancers ftw.
Never seen toddlers with thighs like that though.They don't look like sacks of potatoes. They look like toddlers.
Those who outright say they hate the change are at risk of being socially shamed for it.Seems like the vast majority of people prefer the changes. So why is this thread 12 pages already?
That's it, I give up. I'm outta here.
"Hey look, you can kill humans" isn't a selling point??
Mortal Kombat and Fatalities.
GTA and killing hookers.
These were huge selling points.
Square Enix themselves might have localized it in just that way.
But sure, I bet if you went to the development team, they'd consider it being someone else making a change to their game.
Because you're wrong!Seems like the vast majority of people prefer the changes. So why is this thread 12 pages already?
If these were clearly adult characters dressed in fetish gear, lingerie, and thongs, then fine. Whatever. It's still tacky, pandering, and tasteless, but there's a place for it. But these are 15 year olds (they look even younger in-game), and if someone finds seeing them dressed in that shit appealing, then yes, that person is pretty fucking creepy.
I think they should've only done one of the two.
Either let them be skimpy 18 year olds (becase those don't exist in the real world!) or censor the 15 year old models. Doing both is overkill imo.
They actually look like both. The head body ratio invokes a child like look, but the hip/waist ratio (and having breasts at all) is something you only see by teens/adults.It doesn't matter how old they actually are. The game's art style makes them look like children.
Those who outright say they hate the change are at risk of being socially shamed for it.
Seems like the vast majority of people prefer the changes. So why is this thread 12 pages already?
But this is my point. If you think it looks "sexy" you are also, by your argument, "unable to detach fiction from reality" because you are referencing the images in the game to real life concepts.
They don't look like sacks of potatoes. They look like toddlers.
If you look at those original models and "paedo" doesn't come to mind... well I don't know what to tell you.
I don't see why they felt the need to both censor the outfits/dialogue AND increase the ages of the characters. Why isn't it one or the other? 18 year olds can't dress sexily or make innuendos?
Heh, that reminds me I've often found some of the fatalities in the MK series, especially the latest one, to be disgusting to the point almost making me gag and yet I'd rather avoid the product that argue for its censorship. I can dislike a thing and still be uneasy about censoring it.
Seems like the vast majority of people prefer the changes. So why is this thread 12 pages already?
Depends on how you view it all. I think clothing like that is unnecessarily annoying in both the norml and censored versions. What I would have preferred is having a more sensible design in the first place and having the other outfits as unlocks, unless of course if they already are.
Those costumes are optional purchases anyway are they not?
Having an in to Japanese culture through my girlfriend, I honestly think the reason why they make this loli stuff is just because they think it's cute.That doesn't answer anything. People feel things for reasons. People think things for reasons. "Because the artist felt like it" is not a card to stop any further analysis of the artist's motivations
Those who outright say they hate the change are at risk of being socially shamed for it.
I think they should've only done one of the two.
Either let them be skimpy 18 year olds (becase those don't exist in the real world!) or censor the 15 year old models. Doing both is overkill imo.
MK fatalities are so ridiculous and over the top that its hard to take them seriously, I am pretty sure they done with comedic intend, hell, in the earlier games characters would explode with unrealistic amount of bones and stuff.
Because it doesn't matter how old the story says they are, the art makes them look like children.
Also it's not censorship in the first place.
Because it doesn't matter how old the story says they are, the art makes them look like children.
Also it's not censorship in the first place.
No, it doesn't. Chibi =/= children. The girls have wide hips and boobs.
Because it doesn't matter how old the story says they are, the art makes them look like children.
Also it's not censorship in the first place.
I get what you are saying, but what you are asking is impossible. How can someone see something and somehow not connect it to some human based thought. Everything we ever see or hear is clearly going to be compared to something we have seen or heard before. What I'm saying is that the fictional potato sack thighs in this game does not make me think of a real potato sack. There is no 1:1 comparison. It's not like I see these chibi character models and think of 5 year olds, which is apparently what tons of people in here think. If that was the case that would be disgusting.