googleplex
Member
Looks exactly the same with slightly better resolution and/or framerate. Or have the same resolution and framerate and look slightly better.
There is nothing "Slight" about the power deference between the PS4 and XBone.
Looks exactly the same with slightly better resolution and/or framerate. Or have the same resolution and framerate and look slightly better.
When people pay more, they expect more. It's pretty simple.MS was trying to make it seem like there wouldn't be much of a difference before launch. If they had done a better job of selling their ecosystem or Kinect then I doubt there would be as much backlash but the constant claims of differences being tiny was whhat they focused on.I don't see how anyone can claim to feel duped by the X1 because it doesn't run games 100% equal to the PS4 or better. There's nothing on the Box or the advertisements that explicitely claims everything you play on this console will be better than the PS4 version. Until it does anyone feeling duped needs to get over themselves and just enjoy the console for the games or trade it in.
You know that in BF4 PS4 has also better framerate, right? Sure not 30 fps difference but between 5-12 fps in many scenes.
Anyone know the story behind that gif?
Yep. I honestly loved the game. One of my top 10 games of 2013, and the fact that there's not that much to play on my PS4 is making me buy this Day One.
No one answer this man. If you want to know what's in the thread, read the thread.
UPDATE #1 said:Executive Producer Scot Amos confirms on GamesRadar LIVE Q&A:
[time stamp 50:35] http://www.twitch.tv/gamesradar/b/497373767
Q: Soooo, ah FPS?
A: So looking here this is the PS4 version running at 60FPS. So again, at 1080P. That's awesome for us to be able to showcase, because when you get your hands on it.... You feel it for sure. And when you're looking at it, you're like, yeah, thats badass.
UPDATE #2 said:IGN talks to A Square Enix spokesperson:
http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/01/23/tomb-raider-definitive-edition-runs-at-60fps-on-ps4
"Both platforms offer the same outstanding Tomb Raider experience. Delivering the core Tomb Raider gameplay at native 1080p and running at 30fps was always our primary goal given the type of experience Tomb Raider is and the exploration we want players to do. Anything beyond 30fps for this version is gravy."
http://i.minus.com/iydgEEG6SzNQO.gif[/MG][/QUOTE]
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/4su87Db.png
There is nothing "Slight" about the power deference between the PS4 and XBone.
To be Fair, can we get the OP updated? Needs some housekeeping. I'll make it easy:
Tinfoil hat time!
I am still certain that the COD and AC4 1080p path was released after reviews on purpose so there was no discernible difference reviewers could talk about. I expect something similar hear if both games are locked 30 then mysteriously patched later to unlock frame rate. Because I am certain PS4 previews for both games mentioned the 1080p difference, but was mysteriously absent come review/day 1 time then patched later.
I don't see how anyone can claim to feel duped by the X1 because it doesn't run games 100% equal to the PS4 or better. There's nothing on the Box or the advertisements that explicitely claims everything you play on this console will be better than the PS4 version. Until it does anyone feeling duped needs to get over themselves and just enjoy the console for the games or trade it in.
It's just a comedy skit and fake rap battle. PM me if you want me to dig up the youtube. It's pretty funny if you're into rap battles.
pls.
That ironic avatar t-shirt is ironic.
Sure.
My wife is 105lbs and 5'2. I'm 205 and 6'2. People always say I'm only slightly bigger than her.
I don't see how anyone can claim to feel duped by the X1 because it doesn't run games 100% equal to the PS4 or better. There's nothing on the Box or the advertisements that explicitely claims everything you play on this console will be better than the PS4 version. Until it does anyone feeling duped needs to get over themselves and just enjoy the console for the games or trade it in.
I got to experience the pretty hair last year, and I thought it did really add to the game and make Lara a more believable character. You're getting a good game with some nice tech behind it on either system you pick this one up for.
Brilliant! But you should start the gif with Morpheus jumping across with PS4 logo on his back.
Scary how seamless it is lol
To be honest, after giving it a little more thought, this is not too surprising. Here's why...
We already saw BF4 performance on both consoles. BF4 was running 1600 x 900 on the PS4 vs 1280 x 720 on Xbone in order to achieve framerate parity. It stands to reason then that with the PS4 running 1920 x 1080 @ 60fps, Xbone would have to run 1600 x 900 in order to achieve framerate parity, but it looks like they decided to keep both at 1920 x 1080, so obviously the framerate becomes the variable, 35 vs 55.
Does anyone think that going with 1600 x 900 for the bone would have been a better choice?
Impliying that has any relation atall to hardware specs?
Impliying that has any relation atall to hardware specs?
Oh man that would be a brilliant edition
No because their first priority was 1080p @ 30FPS anything over that was a bonus, it just happens that the PS4 managed to go up to 60FPS
And that matrix gif is godly.
Sure, until you played Forza 3 or Burnout Revenge (my favorite racer from last generation) and remembered what 60FPS looks like on a racing game.
Just sarcastically saying that doubling something isn't "slightly."
Approximately 30 fps suggests that the game could fall beneath 30 frames per second. Do we know if that's the case?
Hah! fair enough, It's really difficult to tell who is being sarcastic and who isnt in these threads ¬_¬
No because their first priority was 1080p @ 30FPS anything over that was a bonus, it just happens that the PS4 managed to go up to 60FPS
And that matrix gif is godly.
Actually it goes above 30 fps. Sometimes hitting as high as 45 fps.Approximately 30 fps suggests that the game could fall beneath 30 frames per second. Do we know if that's the case?
I solve that problem by automatically assuming everyone here is being sarcastic.
It helps it all go down smoother.
What really pisses me off about these comments is Penello asked if the community would apologize to him if the framerate difference is not more than a few single digits, and yet he has not had the self-respect to come here and apologize to us when the difference is demonstrably massively larger in a myriad of multiplatform titles
can't tell you how much this whole shit this year has soured me on the whole brand
Wow that's amazing, you get an achievement just for buying a PS4?
Approximately 30 fps suggests that the game could fall beneath 30 frames per second. Do we know if that's the case?
I dunno, looks honest to me.
Actually it goes above 30 fps. Sometimes hitting as high as 45 fps.
Well first I don't think MS had a ps4 on hand to quantify just what the difference were ultimately going to be. I don't think anyone could have predicted what they were going to be and honestly it's still too early to emphatically state what the difference amount to. Different games have different results. We'll have a much better idea in a year or two. The backlash I just personally found weird. I get people don't like Microsoft but with the systems out I figured out it would die down.When people pay more, they expect more. It's pretty simple.MS was trying to make it seem like there wouldn't be much of a difference before launch. If they had done a better job of selling their ecosystem or Kinect then I doubt there would be as much backlash but the constant claims of differences being tiny was whhat they focused on.
2-4K textures are going to pop more at 1080P than 720P, and seeing as they replaced every low res texture it's a no brainer.
As said the FPS is just gravy.
Approximately 30 fps suggests that the game could fall beneath 30 frames per second. Do we know if that's the case?