CouchMaster
Member
Sadly when it comes to portables, cost and portability factor matters equally, if not more.Einbroch said:Software. That's all that matters at the end of the day.
Sadly when it comes to portables, cost and portability factor matters equally, if not more.Einbroch said:Software. That's all that matters at the end of the day.
Azriell said:Didn't Sony lower the price of the Vita to that of the 3DS? $250 vs $400 (or whatever the speculated price was) is a much bigger deal than $170 vs $250. $250 isn't that much in these days, and to the core (whom are more likely to buy a Vita over 3DS, in my mind), $250 is quite cheap compared to the cost of a $400+ console. Shit, its even still cheaper than the iPod Touch which is somewhat surprising to me.
chubigans said:And instead of buying the $250 Vita, I can buy an additional 250 iOS games.
MadraptorMan said:To be fair, with today's economy 25000 yen is a lot more than $250 USD. They probably could afford to lower the Japanese price a bit to be in line with the conversion rates...
MadraptorMan said:To be fair, with today's economy 25000 yen is a lot more than $250 USD. They probably could afford to lower the Japanese price a bit to be in line with the conversion rates...
Sean said:Sony kind of fucked up by announcing the Vita's pricing so early. They gave their competitors (mainly Nintendo) months to react and counter it, and all the "Holy shit it's much cheaper than I thought!!" hype/frenzy has kind of cooled down after all these weeks.
I feel like they should've waited until TGS or something.
No it isn't.omg.kittens said:Really? $250 is pretty damned cheap already.
That last rumor is actually being spread by Giant Bombs own Patrick Klepeck.bobbytkc said:Look. Sony didn't 'lower' any price, 250 was the first announced, and only known price, period. They also didn't 'lower' the amount of ram or whatever bullshit. Those are just forum rumours, stuff pulled out of people's asses, and should be treated as such.
ThisWreckage said:I think that it's going to be doomed because of the worldwide economy more than anything. It's reasonably priced for what you're getting, but people forget that it's still 250 in an economy when some people can't even find jobs.
pickle said:still happy to pay 249. seems like the perfect handheld for me. all i ever wanted was dual analog controls.
patrick is so useless he should be demoted to intern status, only redeeming thing about him is that he actually bought an arcade cabinetnewjeruse said:That last rumor is actually being spread by Giant Bombs own Patrick Klepeck.
Curufinwe said:No price at E3 would have been a PR disaster.
There's not. I was joking.Peagles said:Are there even 250 iOS games worth owning? Maybe I'm just weird, but I'd much rather have the Vita. I'm a bit old school with tangible goods though :lol
Kazuo Hirai, Sony Chairman Howard Stringers top lieutenant, signaled yesterday the company wont engage in a price war with Nintendo.
Kagari said:Not really worried. The Japanese support will be there and that's all I care about.
newjeruse said:That last rumor is actually being spread by Giant Bombs own Patrick Klepeck.
DeaconKnowledge said:No it isn't.
Once again GAF doesn't get it.
ThisWreckage said:I think that it's going to be doomed because of the worldwide economy more than anything. It's reasonably priced for what you're getting, but people forget that it's still 250 in an economy when some Americans can't even find jobs.
EmCeeGramr said:This handheld generation is insane.
Nintendo announces a glasses-free 3D handheld while the DS is riding high.
Nintendo shows a system that blows people away at E3, with everyone citing the amazing 3D, great graphics, and huge lineup.
Sony announces a PSP2 called the Vita with dual touch panels and 3G and PS3-like power, everyone is blown away.
The 3DS comes out for $250, and suddenly people think the 3D's terrible, the graphics suck, and the lineup is shit and it underperforms.
Vita is announced to be $250, everyone flips their minds at the low, low price for that hardware and what a bargain it'll be.
Nintendo cuts the 3DS price by $80 in the first six months, personally apologizes to its early adopters, and gives them free games.
Investors and commentators claim that the Vita is now fucked at $250 because it's priced too high.
chubigans said:There's not. I was joking.
OldJadedGamer said:They didn't announce the PSP price at E3 the year it launched.
Kagari said:Not really worried. The Japanese support will be there and that's all I care about.
Psychotext said:I doubt I'll ever buy another dedicated gaming portable again. Between my phone, my tablet and my laptop I've pretty much run out of space for further gadgets anyway.
Maybe I need more pockets...
Who is proposing to take the device away or remove its "high end" ness? All you just did was argue that the price should stay high....well....because?bobbytkc said:Fixed. Where I am the economy is just fine. I like my high end devices and phones. Thank you very much.
bobbytkc said:Fixed. Where I am the economy is just fine. I like my high end devices and phones. Thank you very much.
DeaconKnowledge said:No it isn't.
Once again GAF doesn't get it. People don't play tech, they play games. Vita is only as good a value to the market as the games it plays, and in comparison to other like minded platforms (ie the DS line and OG PSP) it is expensive.
It's not delayed in Japan.GavinGT said:So, the delay to 2012 was undoubtedly for cost reasons.
Live Free or Die said:$250 is expensive now? Whatever.
Curufinwe said:I don't think you get that Sony aren't prepared to lose shit tons of money on video game hardware anymore. So 250 American dollars is cheap given the cost of manufacturing the hardware.