Are you trolling or what? I agree that it was no way near e3 demo but awful? hahahhahah
Yeah old gen graphics and bad performances.
Are you trolling or what? I agree that it was no way near e3 demo but awful? hahahhahah
Then what?you can't be serious. lets just ignore everything else going on in that gif.
it's not just the particles that impress. infamous 2 had particles too.
Nothing, it's exactly the same technically.Then what?
A perfectly valid question, yet refused to be answered by so many. When you make statements of factual nature you better back them up. Or Has GAF fallen to the level of discourse of GameFAQs? It certainly seems so.Nothing, it's exactly the same technically.
You win.
A perfectly valid question, yet refused to be answered by so many. When you make statements of factual nature you better back them up. Or Has GAF fallen to the level of discourse of GameFAQs? It certainly seems so.
What statement did i make again?A perfectly valid question, yet refused to be answered by so many. When you make statements of factual nature you better back them up. Or Has GAF fallen to the level of discourse of GameFAQs? It certainly seems so.
I liked the part where the random abusive boyfriend has a gun and vaults over like 4 fences
I've seen that section before in an earlier presentation (goes to show how unique and dynamic everything is.. sheesh) and that was the first thing that turned me off about this game.
Some random dude vaulting fences like it's nothing and carries a gun. What the hell?
PC - confirmed by the community manager on twitter.
The fact that they cant get a stable framerate on PC is worrying. You'd think they'd be using 1x Titan or better too. Gamersyde vid is only 30fps as well.
Early build. And probably a pc build with PS4 specs in mind.
It's too early to judge from this video how the final version will be. It's probably from may this year.
Early build. And probably a pc build with PS4 specs in mind.
It's too early to judge from this video how the final version will be. It's probably from may this year.
Yeah I was wondering what specs they would target showing a PC version and whether or not adjusting expectations of what the final product will look like on next-gen consoles enters the equation.
On one hand you would think they would show the absolute best version (PC) with all the bells and whistles on, but would that lead to a massive backlash if the final product doesn't meet the expectations set by such reveal.
On the other hand they don't seem to have any problems putting out highly anti-aliased and post processed bullshots that probably fall more under the banner of concept art than screenshot representative of actual gameplay.
I love how you're presenting it as a fact when you're just pulling it out of your ass.
This could very well be from a couple of weeks old build, it's not a public gameplay demo, why would they use a build from May when they're just showing off a controlled instance of the game?
And why exactly would it "probably" be a build with PS4 specs in mind?
The_Intruder said:I guess it's pc with ps4 spec...
me said:that seems like the most logical guess imo.
Is the amount of VRAM the primary 'driver' when it comes to a long draw distance? What role do the CPU/GPU play in this?
The fact that they cant get a stable framerate on PC is worrying. You'd think they'd be using 1x Titan or better too. Gamersyde vid is only 30fps as well.
What statement did i make again?
All i can think of is agreeing that Infamous is technically ahead of GTA V (just because it can use more on next gen consoles, not because the devs are more talented or anything.). But i'm sure Rockstar will blow that game completely away in their next game.
In art direction alone, but also in all their attention to detail. I also think GTA V will look a bit more jaggy than we have seen thus far, when it's actually running on our PS3 or 360
Ah okay. Infamous graphically more impressive than Watchdogs you mean? I dunno.. I think they both could use some extra work ;p. But both still have time.I didn't mean you specifically. Many here have expressed the view that Infamous SS is so such better graphically but when asked for specifics, they consider the question ridiculous or me, the poster, as a troll/blind/astroturfer, etc... and avoid it altogether.
chicago
I thought WD's launch is on November 20? If so they don't have time to improve graphics at this point since the game is going gold in a few weeks.Ah okay. Infamous graphically more impressive than Watchdogs you mean? I dunno.. I think they both could use some extra work ;p. But both still have time.
From the actual gameplay i've seen Infamous also looks a bit more rough than people made me believe. But i'm sure it will look incredible on launch.
Same with Watchdogs. Infamous being exclusive for the platform might give it an edge though.
I thought WD's launch is on November 20? If so they don't have time to improve graphics at this point since the game is going gold in a few weeks.
Was excited 2 years ago when the game was revealed, probably won't play it unless it drops to 5$ on sale.
This looks nothing like the gameplay video from last year. I'm sure its gonna be fun gameplay wise, graphics however look current gen.
LOD issues, blatant texture pop-in, shadow flickering...and just an overall significant downgrade in overall detail and IQ. Oh, and occasional framerate drops down into the upper 10s / early 20s.
Ubisoft can't optimize for shit, on PC or consoles. AC3 runs like garbage on PC for people who have really strong and modern hardware.
I didn't mean you specifically. Many here have expressed the view that Infamous SS is so such better graphically but when asked for specifics, they consider the question ridiculous or me, the poster, as a troll/blind/astroturfer, etc... and avoid it altogether.
That's possible. Still, I don't think WD looks bad by any means, only somewhat soft. It probably won't be the case on a good PC.If (if..)that build is old. Then they have been working since then (may/ june and while making the demo).
Do you think people can't go back in this topic and see what really happened? Who do you think you're fooling?
First of all, you got called blind NOT for saying inFamous wasn't much beyond Watch Dogs, but for saying inFamous did not look much better than GTAV outside of the character models. That was literally your entire statement for which people called you blind for.
THEN when you trollposted the response "OH LOL I GUESS PEOPLE DONT LIKE THE TRUTH", several posters went into specifics with you. This is a very specific post that shows numerous ways inFamous: Second Son destroys GTAV.
Then your response to me was another one sentence troll post piece of shit nonsense with "LOL PARTICLES" and a goal post moving to start comparing inFamous to Watch Dogs instead of GTAV, which wasn't what the conversation YOU STARTED was about when you made the "infamous is not much better than GTAV other than the character models" comment.
You continued to follow that up with one or two sentence troll posts, no matter how specific individuals got, barely touching on any points being raised and just using your post to make absurd comparisons like using an image of Kameo to discredit inFamous: Second Son's amazing particle effects.
So, please, spare us your persecution bullshit. YOU are the reason for the quality of this debate.
Looks great, I've split it into smaller parts. I'd advise everyone to watch the HD clips first.
Clip 1 | AVI | 522MB | 3m 40s | Rapidshare
Clip 2 | AVI | 458MB | 3m 40s | Rapidshare
Clip 3 | AVI | 385MB | 3m 30s | Rapidshare
Clip 4 | AVI | 422MB | 3m 40s | Rapidshare
The same as Watch Dogs looking better than GTAV.What does that have to do with Second Son looking better than GTAV?
The same as Watch Dogs looking better than GTAV.
Ah the hypocrisy.
Compare Watch Dogs to GTAV and nobody bats an eyelash. Compare Infamous SS to GTAV and everyone goes crazy.
yeah sure
I see stuff like this and laugh at he people who really think this is what the end product is going to look like.
This is not one of those cases where the next-gen version is just upscaled from the current-gen game. They're separate products and the leading version is the latter.Watch_Dogs is on the same platform as GTAV. It looks better on the next-gen versions, but it's cross gen.
No reason too. The particle effect looks cool but it's nothing impressive. And we've had bokeh DOF since Crysis 2 on PS3/360.I see stuff like this and laugh at he people who really think this is what the end product is going to look like.
Ah the hypocrisy.
Compare Watch Dogs to GTAV and nobody bats an eyelash. Compare Infamous SS to GTAV and everyone goes crazy.
Cutscenes indeedIt's an in-game cutscene, that's what the in-game cutscenes will look like. What is the issue?