Y2Kev said:He'll see it, I quoted Luke.
Also, I just did the 5th ranking battle. lulzulzulzulzulz
TheOneGuy said:It may not have a ton of variety (on the trash, anyway, the bosses are fuckin' sweet), but it's just so satisfying.
And that's all I'll say.
He doesnt talk for the sake of talking. Better than the stupid rants and I can talk louder than you segemtns the others go on.Linkzg said:Shawn is awesome on the brodeo, but on 1upyours he barely talks. He should atleast work in a "what the hell" or "dang" every once in a while even if he doesnt want to speak about topics at hand, clearly Ryan understands that really well.
HK-47 said:He doesnt talk for the sake of talking. Better than the stupid rants and I can talk louder than you segemtns the others go on.
They're longer, less involving, less exciting, less accessible.Spirit of Jazz said:Okay, nobody's bitch about Shane's comments on the LO shorts. I don't get how they're any more of a missuses of the format than cutscenes. It's the equivalent of saying films render books irrelevant, because cutscenes are nothing more than films, they don't involve any aspect of gameplay. He might have more of a point if they were dealing with aspects in the present, but how is a short story a more inferior method of telling a past event than a cutscene?
aeolist said:They're longer, less involving, less exciting, less accessible.
I think his comment about how he wouldn't score a game higher for coming bundled with a copy of Moby Dick is spot on. It's basically the same thing. I'm sure they're very nice stories, but it's a complete misdirection of effort.
It's not the same argument. You'd have to make the comparison between a movie and a movie that has long sections of scrolling text.Spirit of Jazz said:Explain how your points can't be applied to why films are superior to books, and refuted in a similar manner?
The Moby dick comment is bs, it's like saying MGS shouldn't be rated higher if it comes bundled with a John Woo flick. The simple fact is cutscenes add no more to the gameplay of a title than written text. The immersion they add to the game depends solely on their quality.
aeolist said:It's not the same argument. You'd have to make the comparison between a movie and a movie that has long sections of scrolling text.
I'm not being selfish, I'm stating my preference and what I think works best for the interactive gaming medium. There are people who want games to be more like movies or more like books, that's their thing. I think they should strive to evoke the same kinds of emotions that other art forms do but in their own unique way. I think there are ways that one could make an RPG and have the story conveyed by means other than cutscenes or short text stories.Spirit of Jazz said:Then don't you think you're being a little selfish here? Just because you don't enjoy a type of game, doesn't mean that a lot of people do. You can't argue that somethings detrimental to gaming when you're obviously not one of the people that would enjoy the genre of game whether it involved that element or not. Beyond that my comments were aimed at Shane, who has a hole lot of love for MGS and text heavy JRPGs.
(please forgive my lazy quoting)
Tieno said:Just listened to the Watcha Been Playing segment. Shawn doesn't waste any breath and I liked how he called out Garnett and others (?) for acting like kids (and generic gamepress folk) at the end, seeing as he's ranted about that before on GFW.
I thought he was being a total wet blanketTieno said:Just listened to the Watcha Been Playing segment. Shawn doesn't waste any breath and I liked how he called out Garnett and others (?) for acting like kids (and generic gamepress folk) at the end, seeing as he's ranted about that before on GFW.
Johnkers said:It's not like N'Gai was OMG I WAS THE FIRST LOLOLO SUCK IT.
.sp0rsk said:Please stop interrupting Shawn. For gods sake let him finish a thought.
Kuroyume said:Shane is so obnoxious.
I like how they made the point that part of the story in Yakuza is the fact that you're just running around the city. Which falls under my personal view on them, the story in a game is not just cutscenes or the dialogue characters are having with one another, but you as the a character in the game walking around in a jungle, or having a shoot out in some battlefield (I think this is what Shawn was getting at too).Tieno said:In retrospective, it feels weird and people seem kind of stuck in their old ways whenever someone mentions story or narative and people talk about a game heavy on cutscenes. When story can be told in a much more unique way that takes way more advantage of the medium.
I have difficulty with this myself and not always thinking of story=putting down controller and watching a movie. In that sense it's hard and almost futile to compete with a (good) movie, especially content wise. But the way a story can be told in a game can be very interesting. It's almost like being IN a story, than watching a story.
Whenever Bryan gets loud he gets a lot shit for it.Gowans007 said:Shane & Bryan were a little quite on this one too, hope to here more debate and less politness.
CANT WAIT FOR NEXT WEEKS SETS!
tino said:Shawn used DMC as an example of bad cinematic cut scenes? What's wrong....I mean, why doesn't he go back to rip off somethingawful.com skits or something?
(I am not saying everybody has to appreicate DMC's camppy humor, but Shawn Elliot's entire reputation was based on camppy, irrelevant, bad-tasted jokes, he has no position to complain DMC's cheesy cut scenes.)
nesmar said:on a side note Shawn is one of the most level headed reviewers ever, the morons need to stop being morons :O
But then it wouldn't be 1Up Yours!sp0rsk said:Please stop interrupting Shawn. For gods sake let him finish a thought.
Fable 2?:lolvoltron said:Great show, Bummer Jaffe wont be making the podtacular podtravaganza of podcast programming perfection next week.
Especially enjoyed Shawns calling 'em all out on the R2 fapping.... "OMIGOD you got to play R2, et al". Man that was cringe-worthy. I would understand if it was a game like Fable 2 or MGS4 or GTA4 or something. But Resistance 2? Give me a break.
voltron said:Great show, Bummer Jaffe wont be making the podtacular podtravaganza of podcast programming perfection next week.
Especially enjoyed Shawns calling 'em all out on the R2 fapping.... "OMIGOD you got to play R2, et al". Man that was cringe-worthy. I would understand if it was a game like Fable 2 or MGS4 or GTA4 or something. But Resistance 2? Give me a break.
Crusade said:Fable 2?:lol
voltron said:What?
You cant honestly say that - to use N'Gai's words - a sequel to a meat 'n' potatoes shooter is more exciting than context based battle systems, a faux-morality mechanic and pet dogs? Can you? Really? REALLY?
voltron said:What?
You cant honestly say that - to use N'Gai's words - a sequel to a meat 'n' potatoes shooter is more exciting than context based battle systems, a faux-morality mechanic and pet dogs? Can you? Really? REALLY?
You realize that Shawn's played practically every console FPS in existence, right? He's not comparing Resistance to the best of PC FPSs - why would he have used his 8/10 Crysis example instead of his 10/10 HL2 Episode Two example if that was the case?Woo-Fu said:Eh, every console FPS pales compared to the best ones on PC. The people who give Resistance a lot of credit are people who are comparing it to other console FPS, not to the best of the PC FPS market.
Resistance is the first console FPS I've enjoyed enough to finish since GoldenEye...
He didn't dismiss the entire game for fuck's sake. He said time and time again that he was talking solely about the single player. Read his posts earlier in this thread. And if you think that Resistance 1's multiplayer now puts it ahead of PC multiplayer games, you're only kidding yourself. Online multiplayer nothing more than a patch of fog? :lol :lol Read up, kid: http://archive.gamespy.com/stats/J-Rzez said:Really? Like "I don't get why you guys are hyped for Resistance 2 because R1 was mediocre. I played a bit of the SP and didn't care to play MP", though the game is known more for it's MP? Then throw in about Crysis? Right, well maybe bring up Bioshock and I'll nod and agree. You're with a media outlet company that does reviews on games, at least play something before dismissing it like that. The MP in R1 is still the measuring stick for console online mp, and it'll put up a good argument against stuff on the PC simply for how well it runs. I always said that PC games ran better due to dedicated servers and stuff, and suggested that they were king, then Resistance hit and now that wall between consoles and PC online mp has become nothing more than a patch of fog.