• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Bernie can win in 2016

Status
Not open for further replies.

BriGuy

Member
I wouldn't hold my breath. He might make a fine president, but the danger of a Trump/Cruz presidency is too great to take that risk.
 
D

Deleted member 231381

Unconfirmed Member
I wouldn't hold my breath. He might make a fine president, but the danger of a Trump/Cruz presidency is too great to take that risk.

This suppose that Clinton is somehow *less* of a risk - but she's consistently shown both that a) she does worse in the GE matchups, and b) she's not very good at handling the long-term smear campaigns. Managing to fend her way through the softball that was Benghazi can't hide a 30 point drop in net approval over a year. That's literally having 2.5% of the American population think you're doing worse *every month*.

Sanders is less risk to Democratic prospects than Clinton.
 

TyrantII

Member
He can win, but he has a smaller percentage chance of winning than the alternative. The question to ask then is whether we want to take that risk given that he won't be able to pass a single of his Democratic Socialist ideals through Congress, so we'd essentially be voting for Supreme Court Nominations. Not one Bernie supporter has ever developed a gameplan to get a single progressive bill passed through Congress. Because it's essentially impossible.

This. It just isn't his time.

Bernie knows this as well, he's a very smart guy. His run is more about holding Clinton's feet to the fire, and influencing policy than anything.

If we want a Bernie president, you need to build up a well of Bernies at the state level and in Congress, so policy can actually change. Presidents don't rule by decree after all.
 

Kusagari

Member
He would win against every candidate but Rubio (and Kasich but he's not even worth discussing).

Regardless, it's a moot point.
 

params7

Banned
This suppose that Clinton is somehow *less* of a risk - but she's consistently shown both that a) she does worse in the GE matchups, and b) she's not very good at handling the long-term smear campaigns. Managing to fend her way through the softball that was Benghazi can't hide a 30 point drop in net approval over a year. That's literally having 2.5% of the American population think you're doing worse *every month*.

Sanders is less risk to Democratic prospects than Clinton.


This is true I feel. And if DWS wasn't leading the DNC, there would have been a fighting chance for Sanders to win the nomination.
 

JordanN

Banned
I wouldn't hold my breath. He might make a fine president, but the danger of a Trump/Cruz presidency is too great to take that risk.

Man, could you imagine a Sanders' presidency from 2016 to 2024?

He could continue the Obama legacy of not invading and occupying any Middle Eastern countries, giving women and minorities more rights, fix the wage gap between rich and poor, free healthcare, finally pass gun control Obama has been fighting tooth and nail for, etc.

It's a shame this has to be considered a "risk".
 

Amir0x

Banned
Made up? I literally just cited all of the points I made with links to pollsters or Huffposts. Come on, this shit is not acceptable, what's the point of even pretending to have a conversation if you're just going to dodge like a motherfucker?

rcpaveragefto2r.png


And Bernie =! establishment support. And unlike Hillary (stared down Benghazi panel and won after endless hours of questioning), no capacity demonstrated to take heat. Withers like a flower. The end result is he is not getting nominated.

I'm sorry but it's not happening for someone who additionally has no chance of getting his ideals passed through congress. Not worth it for a conversation.
 
Bernie>>>>Hillary>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republican

Im actually not that interested in Bernie himself, but more in the grassroot he has been able to grow (he has had huge crows so far). Even if Bernie won't become POTUS Im very sure that his message and politics will have a lot of influence among people.

Yeah, the movement (and that is an appropriate term here) that he's generated isn't going to disappear, even if he loses. He's empowered/emboldened a lot of people. The majority of them won't be organizers, and yes a lot of them will lose interest, but I'm very optimistic about the long-term future of progressive politics in the US.
 

SamVimes

Member
rcpaveragefto2r.png


And Bernie =! establishment support. And unlike Hillary (stared down Benghazi panel and won after endless hours of questioning), no capacity demonstrated to take heat. Withers like a flower. The end result is he is not getting nominated.

I'm sorry but it's not happening for someone who additionally has no chance of getting his ideals passed through congress. Not worth it for a conversation.

He's talking about the general election, not the primaries.
 

Gun Animal

Member
I wouldn't hold my breath. He might make a fine president, but the danger of a Trump/Cruz presidency is too great to take that risk.

what's your point? Bernie would do better in the GE than Hillary, Hillary is liked by hardline party democrats and literally nobody else.
 

fantomena

Member
rcpaveragefto2r.png


And Bernie =! establishment support. And unlike Hillary (stared down Benghazi panel and won after endless hours of questioning), no capacity demonstrated to take heat. Withers like a flower. The end result is he is not getting nominated.

I'm sorry but it's not happening for someone who additionally has no chance of getting his ideals passed through congress. Not worth it for a conversation.

Next time I meet Bernie Im gonna tell him he's just have to let it go, give up. It's for the best. He can't win anyway, so what's the point?
 
D

Deleted member 231381

Unconfirmed Member
snip
And Bernie =! establishment support. And unlike Hillary (stared down Benghazi panel and won after endless hours of questioning), no capacity demonstrated to take heat. Withers like a flower.

I'm sorry but it's not happening for someone who additionally has no chance of getting his ideals passed through congress. Not worth it for a conversation.

That's Clinton against Sanders, which is totally different. I'm not arguing Sanders will beat Clinton (I think it is unlikely he will). I'm arguing if he did, he would do much better in the general election.

Secondly, citing Benghazi as evidence that Clinton handles flak well is laughable. One single event doesn't hide the fact that 2.5% of Americans think less of her every single month, before we've even entered a general election campaign. If her current favourability trend rate continues, she'll be less popular than Romney was by May.

Romney.

Sanders might not get a lot of his ideas passed through Congress. nevertheless, given he will do better downticket than Clinton, he will get, relatively, more Democratic ideas through Congress than Clinton did. This is also totally ignoring all of the aspects that the president does exert more or less direct control over, like foreign policy. You ever seen an academic review of Clinton's performance as secretary of state? They're not particularly complimentary.
 

Damerman

Member
I'm voting for him and i'm polling for him... worse comes to worst, I'm voting for Hilary in the general.
 

oneils

Member
Okay, cite this polling data. Name one poll released in the past months not from PPP that shows Sanders doing significantly worse [that's polling significant, so outside the MoE] than Clinton in general election match-ups. Also, Clinton is literally terrible at taking heat. This is her favourability ratings over the course of 2015 - and we're not even out of the primaries! The Republicans are barely focusing on her over their squabbles with each other and yet perception of Clinton has nosedived. This is the sort of candidate you expect to do well in a presidential election?

Come on, it's the Sanders people bringing all the facts here; you're just repeating trite truisms that have actually turned out to be falsisms over the course of this cycle.

Hilary can't take heat? Were you born after 2000 or something? She handled herself pretty well during her husbands administration. There is also her testimony in front of various committees re: Benghazi and emails. It all kinda shows that she performs well under pressure. Sure we can criticize her politics but I'm not sure we can criticize her ability to perform under pressure.
 

BriGuy

Member
what's your point? Bernie would do better in the GE than Hillary, Hillary is liked by hardline party democrats and literally nobody else.
You spout this off like it's hard fact.

Well, let me give you my opinion. Bernie might be a harder sell for the independents and undecided voters than Hilary, especially with the Republican attack machine in full swing warping public perception of him and what he stands for. This may not be enough to drive them into the arms of Trump, but it might be enough for them to say fuck it and not participate in the election at all. When all is said and done, I still think Hilary is a safer horse to bet on and I don't think I'm alone.
 
D

Deleted member 231381

Unconfirmed Member
Hilary can't take heat? Were you born after 2000 or something? She handled herself pretty well during her husbands administration. There is also her testimony in front of various committees re: Benghazi and emails. It all kinda shows that she performs well under pressure. Sure we can criticize her politics but I'm not sure we can criticize her ability to perform under pressure.

I don't mean in a pressure situation, I mean the long grind of attacks and knowing how to position yourself against them. We have a lot of evidence to suggest she's not good at that - again, just look at those favorability ratings. It's genuinely both impressive and alarming how much damage she's allowed to be done to her image over the year.
 

Foffy

Banned
If he can, he can.

If he can't, he can't.

Flow with what is. We're not getting any genuine progress moving forward for a while: all we're focused on is fighting the regressives, the enemies of reason.
 

Linkyn

Member
Yep, I do agree that he would not be able to pass much if any at all of his ideals; however, I think that the existence of his presidency would be important because it establishes his ideas as something that is supportable. Basically, I think it moves the country forward in that direction, because someone of his nature becoming president is a big deal.

I'm more afraid that a Sanders presidency might sour the general population on his ideals when nothing gets done because of the blockade in congress.
 
D

Deleted member 231381

Unconfirmed Member

He's not wrong. Clinton's favourable ratings among Republicans and Independents are appalling; Sanders' are actually quite good. Sanders' net favourables by Quinnipac are +8, Clinton's are -9 - that's a double-digit difference.
 
If we had more time? Maybe. As we stand? No. The youth vote would have to really count but the average twenty-something in the US couldn't give two shits about voting.

I'll vote for him but Clinton will, almost undoubtedly get the dem nomination.
 
Bernie's problem isn't his ideology, policy or convictions. All of those that he has are admirable and honest

Bernie's problem is that he isn't a Democrat and has made a career as an inpendent Congressman and indepdant Senator against Democrats and has been very critical of the Democrat party and lambasted them many times

now he is running for President using the vehicle of the Democratic Primary although he is an Independent.

Now you can see why the Democrat Establishment are not going to allow him to win the nomination.
 

newjeruse

Member
It's really unfortunate that in my lifetime, Bernie is the presidential candidate whose ideals most match-up with mine, yet I have no passion for his campaign because I know he can't win.
 

danm999

Member
He can't, but I'm glad he is running.

He is normalizing a lot of ideas and concepts that would otherwise be anathema in US politics.

But yeah, Hillary will win.
 
He's not wrong. Clinton's favourable ratings among Republicans and Independents are appalling; Sanders' are actually quite good. Sanders' net favourables by Quinnipac are +8, Clinton's are -9 - that's a double-digit difference.

Clinton also has an incalculably better campaign infrastructure and much higher awareness and favorability amongst women and minorities, key constituents for Democrats to win.
 
the problem with sanders is that he is advocating ideas that will not be liked by corporate america.

and what happens if corporate america doesnt like something? well then it must be communism.

if sanders gets to be the candidate trump will roll over him with the communist argument. that alone will probably win trump the election
 

noshten

Member
Of course he can win in fact he would decimate Trump or Cruz in a GE, especially with Warren as his running mate. His main challenge is winning the democratic nomination. Main problem for him are people over 45 who especially within the democratic party - seem to be very happy with a Clinton nom.
 
Also, trumpeting Bernie's favorability rating when the GOP has barely paid any attention or diverted any of their energy to attacking him is pretty misleading. Hillary's favorables have slid, but they rose after the Venghazi hearing, a.k.a. when she was in the spotlight.
 

injurai

Banned
He totally can, his chances of taking the Dems ticket are pretty good, and the general support for Trump isn't as great as the party specific support.
 
Anyone can win if you vote for them.

That said, the DNC is so committed at this point to Hillary because they know exactly what they're getting with her and are much more confident in her name/platform's ability to move votes. I believe she has a better chance against a generic Republican than Bernie has, and especially against someone like Trump or Cruz. Polls are misleading now coz it's not a two-man race yet.

Bernie Sanders shares 99% of the same platform as Hillary Clinton and I hope his supporters realize that. The more I see heated Bernie fans on Facebook decrying Hillary almost as passionately as Trump tells me they very likely could sit out the general if he loses. Which, of course, would be doing themselves and their candidate a disservice.
 

fantomena

Member
If you want him to win, vote for him in the nominations thing. If he doesn't win, vote for Hillary in the primaries or whatever it's called.

Im not American so I don't have a lot of knowledge about USAs election systems.
 

injurai

Banned
It's not impossible, but not likely. So long as people actually vote (or do some research if they're on the fence to any candidate), he'll have a chance. So actually do so, America, because no matter what your political alignment, the candidate on the other end is a pure disaster waiting to occur.

The feel like he can if everyone would stop saying he can't but I don't think that's gonna happen and so goes the circle of life.

Yup.

If you want him to win, vote for him in the nominations thing. If he doesn't win, vote for Hillary in the primaries or whatever it's called.

Im not American so I don't have a lot of knowledge about USAs election systems.

The primaries are the "pre-elections" to put someone on the ticket for each party. Vote Bernie in the primaries. Then vote Dem in the general elections.
 
As a republican I pray to God that Bernie gets the nomination, he is too weak to defend his own stage against a protester, he would get destroyed in the debates.

That being said if my party elects Trump (which I am still convinced they will not) I may have to vote for Bernie.
 
As a republican I pray to God that Bernie gets the nomination, he is too weak to defend his own stage against a protester, he would get destroyed in the debates.

That being said if my party elects Trump (which I am still convinced they will not) I may have to vote for Bernie.

lol. Now that's conservatism.
 
Anyone can win if you vote for them.

That said, the DNC is so committed at this point to Hillary because they know exactly what they're getting with her and are much more confident in her name/platform's ability to move votes. I believe she has a better chance against a generic Republican than Bernie has, and especially against someone like Trump or Cruz. Polls are misleading now coz it's not a two-man race yet.

Bernie Sanders shares 99% of the same platform as Hillary Clinton and I hope his supporters realize that. The more I see heated Bernie fans on Facebook decrying Hillary almost as passionately as Trump tells me they very likely could sit out the general if he loses. Which, of course, would be doing themselves and their candidate a disservice.

Bernie supporters know that the game is rigged. Hillary will keep the rigged game going. Saying they agree on 99% of the issues is a falacy unless you're including such things as that the grass is green and the sky is blue.

Hillary might not even win the general if she makes it that far. She has no crossover appeal. Meanwhile Bernie is the most approved-of US Senator in the country. I'd say a majority of awakened individuals will not vote for Hillary. They won't vote or will vote 3rd party. She quite frankly is not a leader. She is an opportunist, an out-of-touch one at that.
 

Future

Member
I wouldn't hold my breath. He might make a fine president, but the danger of a Trump/Cruz presidency is too great to take that risk.

Unfortunately this is the road that might lead directly to trump as people underestimate how unlike able Hillary is
 
Also, trumpeting Bernie's favorability rating when the GOP has barely paid any attention or diverted any of their energy to attacking him is pretty misleading. Hillary's favorables have slid, but they rose after the Venghazi hearing, a.k.a. when she was in the spotlight.
It's extremely misleading. Where would Bernie be, in the current American climate, after months of anti-socialism attack ads for a guy who is a self professed, unapologetic socialist? I do not think he'd fair better than Clinton vs the GOP's media campaign, at all.
 

Holmes

Member
I'd actually like to go to an alternate universe where Bernie is nominated to see how his numbers change once he's actually being attacked by Republicans. Because you guys seriously seem to think the words "trillions of dollars in spending" and "raising taxes on the middle class" don't mean anything in American electoral politics.
 

billeh

Member
Strongly prefer Bernie, but I would be fine with Hillary. What we really need is turnout in off-years to clean out the house and senate.

That's where the problems lie.
 
I mean, sure, something bad could happen to Hillary that knocks her out of the race. That's always a possibility. That's basically what "Bernie can win" registers as to me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom