skinnyrattler said:
It's an average game. Both with COD4 and COD:WAW. I'm just plugging thru because I want some mindless shooting but all CODs haven't been up to snuff in gameplay, on single player. It's shoot, move to next spot, shoot some more. No strategy, no nothing. Just extreme casual crap. But, I'm not here for anything more. Just shoot and knock a few people down. If you want graphics, you shouldn't probably get the Wii version. Unless all you have is the Wii version. Then you are limited to very few FPS. And you're screwed.
Well, I've got a 360 as well but even if I enjoy good graphics (though the most important thing for me is art direction, thus the best game's gfx of this gen for me is MP3, not Gears 2 or something)... the only thing I find very important on "my" gfx are the textures and framerate.
I've ordered the other day COD4 as well, so you and I are on the same boat :lol
If I have a chance of the same fps on Wii I'd rather get it for Nintedo's console since dual analog fps controls give me motion sickness, I'm constantly fighting against them... only thing that makes it better is when the game features a perfect (and still challenging) lock-on aiming mode. This is why I'm giving up on Bioshock even if I reckon the gameàs really good. since it gives me nausea :-/
Mindless shooting and blowing up thing is what I'm looking for, Black was my favourite FPS of last gen, how does this one compare?
Zzoram said:
Why would you ever consider it on Wii when you have a 360/PS3?
You know, opinions? Different tastes and priorities?
Read above, most of us HATE inferior dual analog controls because it's:
less precise
constantly fighting against the aiming reticule and with the turning/look-around speed
less immersive
less FUN
That's a lot more important
TO ME than better graphics/online, obviously the less featured version has still to be worth it, since having all those things less the Wii-controls isn't worth it to me (and others).