schuelma said:So what do people think for a price point? 1500 Wii points or so?
Threi said:
Throwing away all the fanboy wars, this game should be multiplat for all downloadable services. Maybe its due to the requirements of PSN/XBLA, but this doesn't strike me as something that would be hard as hell to port.
Whatever though my fridge is empty, and i have 3 2GB freezers so im good.
FF_VIII said:It's silly to think that it won't go to PSN/XBLA.
It's Capcom after all.
SonicMegaDrive said:I'd pay upward of 2000 points for it.
But that would be limiting the audience, quite a bit, wouldn't it?
actually, as long as I've been begging for this game, I'd probably pay 5 or 6 times even that...
Xeke said:Show me the last time capcom moved a game from the most popular platform to a trailing platform.
Xeke said:Show me the last time capcom moved a game from the most popular platform to a trailing platform.
bigmakstudios said:That's insanity, dude (the spoiler). It's a NES game. Think about what you're saying. This should cost $10, at most, considering that Bionic Commando Rearmed is a complete remake of a NES game with 3D models and environments, co-op, and other game play related additions and revisions, and only costs $10.
What... you want a retail release too?slicedking said:Why WiiWare exclusive?
Nintendo need games for their service, just like Microsoft and Sony have been courting developers for timed exclusives or otherwise. Nintendo say to Capcom: what have you got? Capcom says Mega Man. Is it that hard to believe?Phife Dawg said:So the franchise holds little weight, yet Nintendo decided to moneyhat it anyways? Sure, makes a lot of sense.
HUELEN10 said:Konami/Capcom is okay, but SEGA/Capcom is what shines!
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v283/huelen1/43854526.jpg
If you want the full thing, PM me!
jarrod said:What... you want a retail release too?
SovanJedi said:Okay, this picture is really annoying me actually. Not that it isn't any good - it's really really well-drawn and I applaud you for it - but why the hell did all the shitty characters survive and all the good ones (Amy aside) become zombies?
SonicMegaDrive said:I don't think Huelen drew it. It was drawn by an artist named 'Tigerfrog'. I think Hulen just made the mockup for it.
Unless Huelen IS Tigerfrog, in which case, my apologies.
Agreedviciouskillersquirrel said:He was banned for spamming his thread, I take it. Have mercy on him, please, and let it not be perma. His charts alone make sales threads 52.87% better.
Well, there's some problems with that reasoning...HUELEN10 said:2. Your talk of the mean age makes me wonder if the PS3 should have been the console this should have been pushed on. It had most of the X series, and in the late 90's, "mega" fans went to Sony's consoles.
No. Classic games get around this just by adding a border. This being exclusive is stupid, but I doubt anyone actually believes it is.MoxManiac said:Isn't 720p a requirement for PSN/XBLA? That might be partially why.
Yeah... I'd rather have it on DS too.slicedking said:Nevermind..Don't wanna start anything. That's not what I meant though.
There may be a lot more Wiis out there than PS3s or 360s, but I'm fairly certain a signifigantly lower percentage of Wii owners have actually taken their systems online. The total number of systems is not the proper number to be looking at here, people who have a system but haven't displayed any predeliction to go online (let alone purchase content there) are immaterial in regards to a game that's strictly available as a download.Xeke said:Show me the last time capcom moved a game from the most popular platform to a trailing platform.
Amir0x said:how can it be a headache to owning all three if something is multiconsole?
It's MORE of a headache to 'owning all three' if something is exclusive, not the other way around![]()
Shig said:There may be a lot more Wiis out there than PS3s or 360s, but I'm fairly certain a signifigantly lower percentage of Wii owners have actually taken their systems online. The total number of systems is not the proper number to be looking at here, people who have a system but haven't displayed any predeliction to go online (let alone purchase content there) are immaterial in regards to a game that's strictly available as a download.
Are VC/Wiiware games averaging more sales than XBLA ones? I'm skeptical.
Visualante said:Nintendo need games for their service, just like Microsoft and Sony have been courting developers for timed exclusives or otherwise. Nintendo say to Capcom: what have you got? Capcom says Mega Man. Is it that hard to believe?
If it costs more than $10 I'll be a little offended. It would have to be really kickass to warrant me dropping $15.
That's a fallacy. Just because something might sell better on one platform doesn't mean the market for it on other platforms should be discounted. Look at the sales of the multiplatorm Soul Calibur II vs. the PS2-exclusive Soul Calibur III. Perhaps SCIII PS2 sold more copies than any individual SKU of SCII (I don't think it actually did, but let's pretend for the sake of argument), but SCII sold many more copies through combined sales over multiple platforms, even if they weren't as strong individually.Kilrogg said:Even taking into account what you said, it can't be denied that, among the PS3, 360 and Wii, Wii is THE retrogaming platform. If you like retro games, and have considered buying at least one of those three consoles, you will most likely end up buying the Wii.
I agree with you! Let's bring Resident Evil 5 to Wii with dumbed down graphics. Moving from best selling to "different markets" is the same thing in this example.Shig said:That's a fallacy. Just because something might sell better on one platform doesn't mean the market for it on other platforms should be discounted. Look at the sales of the multiplatorm Soul Calibur II vs. the PS2-exclusive Soul Calibur III. Perhaps SCIII PS2 sold more copies than any individual SKU of SCII (I don't think it actually did, but let's pretend for the sake of argument), but SCII sold much more copies through combined sales over multiple platforms, even if they weren't as strong individually.
MM9 may very well sell more on Wii than it would elsewhere, but those extra sales wouldn't really be insignifigant. Even if it sold half as many copies on XBLA+PSN combined, that's still 50% more income from the title for Capcom.
Link1110 said:Do WiiWare games force firmware updates on you?
Shig said:That's a fallacy. Just because something might sell better on one platform doesn't mean the market for it on other platforms should be discounted. Look at the sales of the multiplatorm Soul Calibur II vs. the PS2-exclusive Soul Calibur III. Perhaps SCIII PS2 sold more copies than any individual SKU of SCII (I don't think it actually did, but let's pretend for the sake of argument), but SCII sold many more copies through combined sales over multiple platforms, even if they weren't as strong individually.
MM9 may very well sell more on Wii than it would elsewhere, but those extra sales wouldn't really be insignifigant. Even if it sold half as many copies on XBLA+PSN combined, that's still 50% more income from the title for Capcom.
I brushed that argument aside because it's honestly pretty laughable to me. "Which console is best for retro games?" is not the prominent bullet point in the buying process of people who buy new consoles that you seem to be implying it is. People buy consoles based on the games that are currently on the shelves and being marketed at them, most aren't particularly cognizant of the retro/downloadable game library until they've already made their decision, if at all.Kilrogg said:The problem is, the message I responded to is not the same as this one. You originally said that, although the Wii install base is superior to that of the 360 or PS3, the percentage of people using it for online might be inferior. Fair enough. What I said is that, even then, the people who are interested in retro-flavoured games (such as Megaman 9) the most, if they are to own one console among the three, likely own the Wii, because it is the best retro gaming platform as far as consoles are concerned.
y'know, I've been noticing a trend in every post you make in wii related threadsVisualante said:Nintendo need games for their service, just like Microsoft and Sony have been courting developers for timed exclusives or otherwise. Nintendo say to Capcom: what have you got? Capcom says Mega Man. Is it that hard to believe?
If it costs more than $10 I'll be a little offended. It would have to be really kickass to warrant me dropping $15.
That sucks. Sorry you feel that way.otake said:I'm okay with it. not buying for wii or any console. 8-bit graphics my ass..
Good for you, I'm buying it on my Wii for the better d-pad. Do we really have to draw console straws all the time? I troll everything..pakbeka.. said:y'know, I've been noticing a trend in every post you make in wii related threads
Cheeto said:That sucks. Sorry you feel that way.
otake said:I'm okay with it. not buying for wii or any console. 8-bit graphics my ass..
8-bit = Megamanotake said:It pisses me off, there's no reason why they couldn't make it look like viewtiful joe or something.
You started gaming during the PS1 generation or after, right?otake said:It pisses me off, there's no reason why they couldn't make it look like viewtiful joe or something.
Then again, the sort of customer interested in something like MM9 is likely already keenly aware of the Wii's downloadable retro library. There's definite overlap here, plus the brand's traditionally done best on Nintendo platforms anyway.Shig said:I brushed that argument aside because it's honestly pretty laughable to me. "Which console is best for retro games?" is not the prominent bullet point in the buying process of people who buy new consoles that you seem to be implying it is. People buy consoles based on the games that are currently on the shelves and being marketed at them, most aren't particularly cognizant of the retro/downloadable game library until they've already made their decision, if at all.