• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

CVG: Microsoft's next-Xbox silence at GDC a "disastrous mistake"

He made a series of points, seems a rather silly way to devolve his perspective there.

Most people know though that there is an accumulated value to buzz that precedes any particular systems launch. We saw with Wii U, there was a decided difference in pre-release hype compared to Wii. Many people didn't want to believe it, but from websites to mass market news reports, there was a definite change in the way people felt about the new Nintendo system.

From a similar perspective, you may be right that ONE individual report means nothing in the long run; the world, as you succinctly put it, does not revolve around us. Nonetheless, that does not make one unable to make fairly wisdom-based observations based on the way the overall buzz is for a system, which certainly includes this CVG article. And I think it's a fair assessment to say a lot of this pre-release buzz, in contrast to that of PS4, is pretty negative at the moment for a lot of reasons. Now how much of it will be true or not at the end of the day is beyond most of us to tell, but what isn't beyond most of us is the ability to assess whether or not this harsh pre-reveal buzz is going to damage the start of Durango's life. Whether the prediction is right or wrong is besides the point, because all discussions such as this are basically people's individual interpretation of events.

Sorry but I can't agree.

All this "negativity" is currently based on unconfirmed rumours. Even then, they're mostly rumours that most likely won't have genuine impact.

The WiiU negativity was based on KNOWN quantities. World of difference.

Most of this negativity, to speak frankly, is coming from Microsoft haters, or those who were never really planning on buying the new Xbox anyway. I mean, even always online, the vast majority of GAFfers have their main consoles always online, so what will change? Nothing.

The only one I gave in to you on was Kinect. REQUIRING Kinect to be plugged in is a genuine negative for most. Not me personally, but most.
 
I need to start stockpiling the "I called it" gifs when Microsoft shows their hand. They won't take risks; they will secure exclusives out the ass.

Mind you, I'm foaming at the mouth at what Sony has shown / promised, but as far as the general gamer / casual / dudebro is concerned, it will still be Microsoft's game to lose (which I feel they won't).
 
I read it. And I just read it again. What is your point?

Keep going until it sinks in that the problem is with dev access, not media coverage.

The media can already get plenty of hits reporting on all the new next-gen footage shown "For PlayStation 4", they don't really need whitepapers from MS to draw eyes.
 
Most of this negativity, to speak frankly, is coming from Microsoft haters, or those who were never really planning on buying the new Xbox anyway. I mean, even always online, the vast majority of GAFfers have their main consoles always online, so what will change? Nothing.

Well, obviously since you don't take issue with things like always-on, then people who do must be "Microsoft haters." Thanks for at least allowing that people can dislike the always plugged in Kinect without being wholly irrational.

Alternatively, maybe people actually have different values and see a bigger picture problem with some of the potential features the next Xbox is rumored to have. Maybe that doesn't make them "Xbox haters" but rather, conscious consumers. But yeah, you should probably just dismiss those people and their opinions outright.
 
The CVG editor is not saying that MSFT should make a public unveiling of the Xbox 3 at GDC, he is saying they should be attending and promoting development on it to all the middle and small developers who will be there.

Hence his main point that console makers are beholden to developers. MSFT not even bothering, apparently, to try and nurture good relations with devs at GDC is what he is calling a mistake.
I call BS on cvg. MS has always been involved with give and take with devs. Just because cvg doesn't see that at GDC does not mean that they are not getting with, sharing with and getting feedback from plenty of devs.

We and even cvg doesn't know shit and this whole piece sounds like a false alarm for hits
 
Keep going until it sinks in that the problem is with dev access, not media coverage.

The media can already get plenty of hits reporting on all the new next-gen footage shown "For PlayStation 4", they don't really need whitepapers from MS to draw eyes.

The problem is with dev access? You mean the developers who have already had Xbox SDKs for over a year now? This is a public event that is of almost no value to a company that hasn't announced or acknowledged their product publicly. I'm sure MS is doing nothing to court developers behind the scenes away from CVG. The next Xbox is going to launch and there just won't be any developer interest or games in the pipeline already.

I'm sure reporting on PS4 RAM is bringing in loads of hits for CVG. It's just so exciting especially the media's inability to even display an image of anything other than a Dual Shock controller that looks a lot like the controller that has been around for a decade. So much excitement about those PS4 announcements right now, the public can hardly contain itself. /s
 
I call BS on cvg. MS has always been involved with give and take with devs. Just because cvg doesn't see that at GDC does not mean that they are not getting with, sharing with and getting feedback from plenty of devs.

It's really something you have to assume. How could they not have been making deals all this time? They can't be as open about it, for what I assume are PR reasons, but MS would need to be run by insane people for them not to have made deals with devs. It would be baffling if they really have been sitting on their hands.
 
The problem is with dev access? You mean the developers who have already had Xbox SDKs for over a year now? This is a public event that is of almost no value to a company that hasn't announced or acknowledged their product publicly. I'm sure MS is doing nothing to court developers behind the scenes away from CVG. The next Xbox is going to launch and there just won't be any developer interest or games in the pipeline already.

It's a public event that's of plenty of value if you want to convince devs in general (rather than a small hand-selected minority) to use your tech. Not at least confirming before it and having a panel or two on your USP is pretty dumb, yes.

You don't even need to nail down all the details, a one-hour presentation on getting ready for Kinect 2.0 (coming to PC this fall!) would even be an improvement.

Is MS making deals in private? Sure. Sony's making deals in private too. Is MS making deals in public? Nope, and meanwhile Sony's rolling into town trumpeting the end of content approval hoops to jump through.
 
It's a public event that's of plenty of value if you want to convince devs in general (rather than a small hand-selected minority) to use your tech. Not at least confirming before it and having a panel or two on your USP is pretty dumb, yes.

You don't even need to nail down all the details, a one-hour presentation on getting ready for Kinect 2.0 (coming to PC this fall!) would even be an improvement.

Is MS making deals in private? Sure. Sony's making deals in private too. Is MS making deals in public? Nope, and meanwhile Sony's rolling into town trumpeting the end of content approval hoops to jump through.

Hi we're from Microsoft Xbox. We just sold about 80 million consoles worldwide and are publishing an indie game called Minecraft that has received 7 million downloads on Xbox Live Arcade. We also own this little platform called "Windows" and the "Windows Store" where we can feature your games in front of hundreds of millions of people. Would you like to do business with us?

Yeah it's going to be very difficult for Microsoft to convince indie developers to use their tech. Reality check please.
 
Hi we're from Microsoft Xbox. We just sold about 80 million consoles worldwide and are publishing an indie game called Minecraft that has received 7 million downloads on Xbox Live Arcade. We also own this little platform called "Windows" and the "Windows Store" where we can feature your games in front of hundreds of millions of people. Would you like to do business with us?

Yeah it's going to be very difficult for Microsoft to convince indie developers to use their tech. Reality check please.

Hi, we're from Sony. We'll actually give you a devkit; you can sign up here.
 
Microsoft gives out devkits too. Really easily. So easily the SuperDAE was able to get his hands on 2 of them. Not hard.

Maybe they should give fewer devkits to Twitter PR men and more devkits to guys like Blow who've come out and said "we're targeting PS4 because Sony will actually talk to us". Just sayin'.
 
Hi we're from Microsoft Xbox. We just sold about 80 million consoles worldwide and are publishing an indie game called Minecraft that has received 7 million downloads on Xbox Live Arcade. We also own this little platform called "Windows" and the "Windows Store" where we can feature your games in front of hundreds of millions of people. Would you like to do business with us?

Yeah it's going to be very difficult for Microsoft to convince indie developers to use their tech. Reality check please.

Is it possible for one dev kit to be used across all three of MS's platforms (Windows, Phone, Durango?), especially for smaller indie games. I honestly have no idea.
 
Is it possible for one dev kit to be used across all three of MS's platforms (Windows, Phone, Durango?), especially for smaller indie games. I honestly have no idea.

Kinda yes. You just use Visual Studio and most of the APIs are now in some ways unified.

You can just start on windows and assume porting to Durango will be a minimal effort. Basically you can develop for Durango right now since the API will be the same.
 
Sorry but I can't agree.

All this "negativity" is currently based on unconfirmed rumours. Even then, they're mostly rumours that most likely won't have genuine impact.

The WiiU negativity was based on KNOWN quantities. World of difference.

Most of this negativity, to speak frankly, is coming from Microsoft haters, or those who were never really planning on buying the new Xbox anyway. I mean, even always online, the vast majority of GAFfers have their main consoles always online, so what will change? Nothing.

The only one I gave in to you on was Kinect. REQUIRING Kinect to be plugged in is a genuine negative for most. Not me personally, but most.
Wat. Xbox only people have already stated how disappointing it would be if the rumours are true, like myself for example. I'm in no way an xbox hater and say if these rumours are true I won't get it.
 
Wat. Xbox only people have already stated how disappointing it would be if the rumours are true, like myself for example. I'm in no way an xbox hater and say if these rumours are true I won't get it.

Announcing early or late won't change anything to that though. In the end, everybody will make his decision based on the real and official info.
All the negative buzz right now isn't really a problem for MS, since it will be reset once they show their cards : if it confirms the rumors, they won't be in a worse place than they are now (if anything they would have gotten rid of the shock value), and if it doesn't, all the current speculation will be quickly forgotten.
Many people claim that MS silence is bad because currently many gamers have a negative opinion on their unannounced console. But right now, those opinions don't matter.
 
Sorry but I can't agree.

All this "negativity" is currently based on unconfirmed rumours. Even then, they're mostly rumours that most likely won't have genuine impact.

The WiiU negativity was based on KNOWN quantities. World of difference.

Most of this negativity, to speak frankly, is coming from Microsoft haters, or those who were never really planning on buying the new Xbox anyway. I mean, even always online, the vast majority of GAFfers have their main consoles always online, so what will change? Nothing.

The only one I gave in to you on was Kinect. REQUIRING Kinect to be plugged in is a genuine negative for most. Not me personally, but most.

Nonsense.

Microsoft have done NOTHING to counter rumours about online DRM, no used games and under powered hardware (which is based of details MS has released to developers)

It is well within their power to affect the current situation - and they have chosen to say nothing.. which in itself lends credibility to the rumours.

You can say something isn't true without confirming your real plan if you want to.

When you get the likes of Jonathon Blow saying he chose PS4 because he believes Durango isn't really being aimed at gamers... Are you suggesting he's a sony fanboy?
 
Kinda yes. You just use Visual Studio and most of the APIs are now in some ways unified.

You can just start on windows and assume porting to Durango will be a minimal effort. Basically you can develop for Durango right now since the API will be the same.

Thanks, that seems to be a huge amount of leverage for a small indie developer (or any developer really). Having your game on Durango, Windows Phone, Windows 8 and Surface with minimal effort has to be massively appealing.
 
That's what a dedicated event is for, CVG.

You know, where you get all the limelight and all of the buzz with nothing else to detract the public eye?

Except that they're doing precisely dick-all to court unconvinced developers. Believe me - if Microsoft's presence here really is that thin, people are going to notice.

Meanwhile, even I'm considering attending the PS4 thing out of curiosity.
 
Who cares about blow. He has had a grudge against ms for a long time now.


The simple fact of the matter is this. Ms has the money and siZe to throw thier own gdc based on thier platforms or to simply fly out too / fly out devs for private meetings.

They simply dont need to be at gdc esp since the current leaks are claimed to have come feom durango day late Last year and ms just had a big private event a week ago

All this sky is falling stuff is ammusing. It happened last gen too with all the xbox 1.5 bs also
 
Disastrous? Come on
If the "720" flops then five years from now I doubt anyone is going to blame it on them not showing it at GDC13
 
Nonsense.

Microsoft have done NOTHING to counter rumours about online DRM, no used games and under powered hardware (which is based of details MS has released to developers)

It is well within their power to affect the current situation - and they have chosen to say nothing.. which in itself lends credibility to the rumours.

You can say something isn't true without confirming your real plan if you want to.

When you get the likes of Jonathon Blow saying he chose PS4 because he believes Durango isn't really being aimed at gamers... Are you suggesting he's a sony fanboy?
"We haven’t been disclosed on Microsoft’s next console, so I don’t know anything about that platform besides the rumors that are on the internet" - Jonathan Blow
 
Who cares about blow. He has had a grudge against ms for a long time now.
The simple fact of the matter is this. Ms has the money and siZe to throw thier own gdc based on thier platforms or to simply fly out too / fly out devs for private meetings.

They simply dont need to be at gdc esp since the current leaks are claimed to have come feom durango day late Last year and ms just had a big private event a week ago

All this sky is falling stuff is ammusing. It happened last gen too with all the xbox 1.5 bs also

hes by a long shot not the only one

multiple indi developers have said that their experience working with ms for Xbox was bad.
just a few examples.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2012-02-06-hypership-developer-xblig-market-isnt-growing

http://indiestatik.com/2012/11/20/xblig-developers-demand-more-timely-payments-from-microsoft/
 
Well, obviously since you don't take issue with things like always-on, then people who do must be "Microsoft haters." Thanks for at least allowing that people can dislike the always plugged in Kinect without being wholly irrational.

Alternatively, maybe people actually have different values and see a bigger picture problem with some of the potential features the next Xbox is rumored to have. Maybe that doesn't make them "Xbox haters" but rather, conscious consumers. But yeah, you should probably just dismiss those people and their opinions outright.

the problem is there is no fact to a lot of this (no offline gaming, Kinect spying etc)... it is just fear mongering which is not typical of someone with an open mind to the system but with an agenda to find fault
 
He made a series of points, seems a rather silly way to devolve his perspective there.

Most people know though that there is an accumulated value to buzz that precedes any particular systems launch. We saw with Wii U, there was a decided difference in pre-release hype compared to Wii. Many people didn't want to believe it, but from websites to mass market news reports, there was a definite change in the way people felt about the new Nintendo system.

From a similar perspective, you may be right that ONE individual report means nothing in the long run; the world, as you succinctly put it, does not revolve around us. Nonetheless, that does not make one unable to make fairly wisdom-based observations based on the way the overall buzz is for a system, which certainly includes this CVG article. And I think it's a fair assessment to say a lot of this pre-release buzz, in contrast to that of PS4, is pretty negative at the moment for a lot of reasons. Now how much of it will be true or not at the end of the day is beyond most of us to tell, but what isn't beyond most of us is the ability to assess whether or not this harsh pre-reveal buzz is going to damage the start of Durango's life. Whether the prediction is right or wrong is besides the point, because all discussions such as this are basically people's individual interpretation of events.

Very good and fair points. However, the reason why I suspect it may not stick or damage Durango at the start of its life is because look at the outcome when the opposite situation ran its course with other products. The pre release buzz on the Vita was extraordinarily good just about everywhere, particularly on forums, and that didn't appear to have any kind of positive carry over effect. Using another example, Kinect was mostly considered to be going nowhere fast or dead on arrival by a lot of forums and generally not very many people seemed convinced it had a serious chance for real success, and yet it ended up having a surprisingly strong degree of success, better than anybody ever expected. On the other hand, PS Move, which was definitely more positively received by gamers and game journalists, and clearly appeared to have more easily applied core game uses, struggled to achieve similar success. So, the buzz is always nice to have, especially when it's positive, but it doesn't exactly always translate the way people think. And public opinion can largely be so fickle and easily changed with one event, one trailer, one interview, one announcement, one comment from the right person. It takes the tiniest of things sometimes to either change minds entirely, or at least make something that much harder to criticize fairly. One way or the other, I think what the Xbox brand as a whole has going for it now in a positive sense is much more determinative of its future than anything it has going against it, which many still don't see as official until the new Xbox is officially unveiled.

The Wii, after Nintendo's E3 presser, made a lot of people want to believe in Nintendo's vision and it was, to a degree, even inspiring to see the passion that they had for the product, but nobody -- and I do mean nobody -- not most game journalist, and certainly not most forums, expected this massive dash of people buying up Wii's in numbers that were utterly destroying the PS3 and 360, and that were rivaling, at times exceeding, even the amazing rate set by the PS2. What I may believe and think makes complete sense to me, may not always be seen the same way by most people. People often ask come NPD time, just who the hell is buying all these 360s, believing that most who want one would already have one by now, or why they would be purchasing one if a new xbox is on the way. That's how out of the loop people are and will likely continue to be. We hardcore gamers are the sure bet, almost impulse buyers of the next generation. They aren't really concerned about not being able to get our attention. They know they will one way or the other. Even if by chance we all consider no used games and Kinect required negative, is that really going to filter throughout the general buying population as a big enough negative to meaningfully hurt sales? I doubt it.

No used games, if true, and Kinect required, I don't believe will hurt the new xbox the way some people think it will. A lot of people, me included, don't mind Kinect, because I know it doesn't mean no controller. I'm also very excited by the prospect of what Kinect could be as a required standard in the next xbox, the way it should have been on the 360, but was, of course, not possible. I think it has exciting potential and I hope it lives up to it. I also don't count myself as being apart of the used games market. It's just something I don't like doing and wouldn't miss very much if it's gone. I've only done it once in my life, and I probably won't do it again. I always, if given a choice, will choose to get my games new. However, I would like to able to lend friends and family my games sometimes. That's pretty important to me, so it would be nice if games could somehow be registered for use on at least two different consoles at any one time. Say, for example, I have someone on here on my xbox live friends list, and I wanted to lend them the physical copy of my game, maybe I could grant permission through their gamertag, to borrow and install my game on their machine, but maybe for the person that borrows the game, there is a time limit that will eventually expire, making the game unplayable afterwards, unless the original owner decides to extend that time limit. Maybe the clock is only ticking when the person is actually playing the game, so if they have it for 5 days, the person would actually need to play it for 120 hours before the game no longer works. I wouldn't mind a system such as this.
 
Sorry but I can't agree.

All this "negativity" is currently based on unconfirmed rumours. Even then, they're mostly rumours that most likely won't have genuine impact.

The WiiU negativity was based on KNOWN quantities. World of difference.

Most of this negativity, to speak frankly, is coming from Microsoft haters, or those who were never really planning on buying the new Xbox anyway. I mean, even always online, the vast majority of GAFfers have their main consoles always online, so what will change? Nothing.

The only one I gave in to you on was Kinect. REQUIRING Kinect to be plugged in is a genuine negative for most. Not me personally, but most.

They're leaks, not just rumors. There's a big difference.

I'd much rather go with what we know based on the leaks and possibly be pleasantly surprised rather than say "Lalala I'm not listening!" And be disappointed when they do finally reveal the thing.
 
Maybe they should give fewer devkits to Twitter PR men and more devkits to guys like Blow who've come out and said "we're targeting PS4 because Sony will actually talk to us". Just sayin'.

If I had the choice I probably wouldn't talk to him either.

Just sayin'.
 
Actually I disagree, I think it's smart to let the PS4 hype die down a bit over the next month and just blow everyone away at once. No need to run the Xbox announcement right after the PS4 one.

The console isn't even revealed yet. Sony still has a lot of games they can show that will blow minds.
 
The console isn't even revealed yet. Sony still has a lot of games they can show that will blow minds.


Unless one really drops the ball in some major way, Microsoft has nothing to be concerned about regarding Sony's plans and reveals, and Sony has nothing to be concerned about regarding Microsoft's plans and reveals.

People will be just as excited to see what the next xbox has to show as they were regarding the PS4 unveil.

http://www.tomsguide.com/us/Microso...-App-Voice-Commands-dictation,news-16875.html

There's no question the next Xbox will have this. Check out how much better it is.
 
Seems to me that a lot of XBLA devs got really sour from their experience with Microsoft this gen. I'd say they've got some convincing to do...

What about XBLI ...Im confused is XBLA indie games or is XBLI indie games...because in that section on xbox i literally see tons of new games up every day and tons of minecraft clones
 
I'm noticing a distinct trend of games NOT being announced for PS4 even though they are presumably coming. First it was BF4 and now MGSV. Preemptive move by MS to shut up third party devs and overcome this "disastrous mistake" or what? Seems very strange that they will not comment on the existence of PS4 versions even though EA execs said on conference call that PS4 version of BF4 looked amazing and Kojipro have been promoting cross gen abilities of FOX engine for some time.
 
In all honesty, I firmly believe that Microsoft might be making last minute hardware changes after they were completely caught off guard by Sony, and finding out just how powerful the PS4 is going to be, especially after hearing about the 8GB of DDR5 RAM.
 
Microsoft have been actively engaging the established developers who work for major publishers.

Over the past generation the industry has changed dramatically in that regard and now the biggest runaway hits often come from small indie teams no one sees coming.

GungHo is a small Japanese start-up who's flagship title (Puzzles and Dragons) is quite possibly the most profitable game at this point in time.

Mojang's Minecraft is a multi-million seller on Xbox 360, where it's sold far less than it has on PC.

Unless you think MS has a crystal ball and is identifying every break out indie/small tier developer this far in advance there is a VERY real weakness by not getting to pitch the next Xbox at GDC.

What was Sony's PS4 unveil really focused on? Ease of development from a technical standpoint with a shout out to a far easier to access storefront.

So what do you think they're going to do at GDC? Likely disseminate a TON of information on just how easy it is to get on their storefront. To thousands of smaller developers who can't afford an Xbox dev kit even if MS knew who they existed and was willing to offer access.

It isn't a "disastrous mistake" like CVG is calling it, but it's leaving a pretty significant opening for Sony to further pitch their "system for developers and gamers, by developers and gamers" mantra uncontested.

Not only does that get more developers interested in Sony's platform, it likely results in more quality unaffiliated titles passing through their screening process for first party distribution.

Another data point:

The stories of Microsoft's hostilities towards smaller devs are beginning to pile up. This is what people are saying.

http://penny-arcade.com/report/arti...crosoft-is-losing-the-battle-for-indie-develo
 
In all honesty, I firmly believe that Microsoft might be making last minute hardware changes after they were completely caught off guard by Sony, and finding out just how powerful the PS4 is going to be, especially after hearing about the 8GB of DDR5 RAM.
no

Totally expected. Sony is just blowing their wad early.

Ms planned for them to be more powerful and are simply sticking to their plan.

No need to panic for them. That's just fantasy as is this article in the OP.
 
I'm noticing a distinct trend of games NOT being announced for PS4 even though they are presumably coming. First it was BF4 and now MGSV. Preemptive move by MS to shut up third party devs and overcome this "disastrous mistake" or what? Seems very strange that they will not comment on the existence of PS4 versions even though EA execs said on conference call that PS4 version of BF4 looked amazing and Kojipro have been promoting cross gen abilities of FOX engine for some time.
I thought they did say a PS4 version to polygon?
 
Top Bottom