Nice try. but nothing will stop this thing, regardless of all the false narrative stories doing the rounds now.i don't care that the price is cheap, kill this fucking thing.
the sales of the series s will prove your statement invalid (sales of the 360 also proves you are wrong)
fucking hell you killed me
X GON GIVE IT TO YEAMy One X stays winning
Its in there. Not confirmed, but its a possibility.I watched DF video, but I missed that.
Alright, thanks for the clarification. I guess this isn't a problem, however, since the Xbox Series S is meant to replace the Xbox One S and the Xbox Series X is meant to replace the Xbox One X.no cerny said they are 62% bigger, not 62% more powerful.
Tahiti is gcn 1.0 or xbox 1s or base ps4, we are looking at polaris which is what x1x is based off of. Polaris was roughly 25-30% more powerful than the tahiti. and rdna is 25-30% more powerful than polaris. which is how DF was getting that 62% figure.
In order for xss to be just as powerful as a 6 tflops polaris x1x, it would need 50% better performance over polaris, but its only 25% according to microsoft and AMD.
4 * 1.25 = 5 tflops
4 * 1.5 = 6 tflops
No, just more powerful than PS5 according to IGN.I thought it's more powerful than the One X
That 2GB part should be pure OS-Part. Developers don't need to worry about that.It's not just the amount of RAM, the RAM speed itself is substantially slower on the S. I suspect the system OS will be pretty slow too. 2 GB RAM running at 56 GB/s doesn't inspire confidence.
10GB @ 560 GB/s, 6GB @ 336 GB/s 8GB @ 224 GB/s, 2GB @ 56 GB/s
It's more modern with features absent in the One X but with less raw power. Think of it like you jump from a mid/high gpu to a newer one, but in the mid/low range.Wait, xbox series S gpu is literally worse than xbox one X gpu, even considering it's rdna 2.0?
Wouldn't you want the bells and whistles from last gen?Good job I wasn't expecting all the next gen bells & whistles on the lowest barier of entry...
There are a lot more optimizations built into the DX apis. Supposedly xbox one games are still running natively. The below states how less ram could be used.
But again this is all just theories but this thread is just based on theories as well.
Most people will be coming from the One S. It will be a substantial upgrade.Wouldn't you want the bells and whistles from last gen?
That’s according to a new Digital Foundry analysis, which notes that because Xbox Series S has less RAM than Microsoft’s highest-end
current-gen console (10GB vs 12 GB), it’s “almost a forgone conclusion” that its backwards compatible games will be drawing upon the
less powerful Xbox One S versions.
The $300 / £250 Xbox Series S was revealed earlier this week and will target running games at 1440p, with support for ray-tracing, 120fps
and 4K upscaling. The console has virtually the same CPU as the $500 Series X, but a less powerful GPU, less memory and no disc drive.
Within the current-gen ecosystem, Xbox One X versions of games are able to leverage the console’s additional power for higher resolution,
improved texture filtering, and expanded colour detail. One X offers similar improvements when running compatible Xbox 360 titles.
However, because of Series S’s memory deficit compared to One X, it likely won’t be able to run Xbox One or 360 games with the current-gen
console’s enhancements, it’s claimed.
Source
This is about backwards compat; games expecting Xbox One X levels of RAM aren't going to work on XSS.
At least they will work, i'd love for PS5 to be able to play PS3 games at their shitty original PS3 frame rates never mind improved one'sMS should have just went with a $399 SX and called it a day.
So now current 1X owners have to pay $499 again to fully benefit from current 1X upgrades with next gen XB.... So every 3 years the XB comunity have to give up $499? Ouch!
So they either downgrade to take advantage of $299 or they spend another $499 in under 4 years to get full benefits.
sounds like a horrible console ecosystem to invest in.
Im arguing for a $399 X, everybody wins, so what's your problem and what did PS3 do to you dog?At least they will work, i'd love for PS5 to be able to play PS3 games at their shitty original PS3 frame rates never mind improved one's
I can't with this fucking console...
Make it go away.
Well, yeah. The XB1X is a 4K console, the XSS isn't.
The XSS is a lot more powerful in other ways of course, but it simply doesn't have the pixel pushing power or the RAM for 4K.
It takes up to much room in the cupboard that's what it does. Wouldn't you like bc on PS5 ?Im arguing for a $399 X, everybody wins, so what's your problem and what did PS3 do to you dog?
Power efficiency .I read somewhere that RDNA 2.0 is 62% more efficient per teraflop. Hence, shouldn't we get the following?
4 RDNA 2.0 teraflops * 0.62 + 4 RDNA 2.0 teraflops = 6.48 GCN teraflops
I read somewhere that RDNA 2.0 is 62% more efficient per teraflop. Hence, shouldn't we get the following?
4 RDNA 2.0 teraflops * 0.62 + 4 RDNA 2.0 teraflops = 6.48 GCN teraflops
Hmm. So my 'only' choice for an upgrade from the X is the XSX.
I'm also a little confused about the XSS and how it fits in to microsoft's strategy. It can't play full BC (as in, upgrades not content) and will therefore fall short on the what gamepass can deliver experience wise, not content wise. The XSS also flies in the face of 'most powerful' (X, XSX).
I get the value proposition, but i can't help but think if MS should have added a 4k UHD drive and pulled a 'PS2' with this thing.
At least they will work, i'd love for PS5 to be able to play PS3 games at their shitty original PS3 frame rates never mind improved one's
the 20 tflops 3070 isnt supposed to be a 1080p or 1440p gpu. it is replacing the 2080 ti which was a $1,200 4k 100 fps gpu.Alright, thanks for the clarification. I guess this isn't a problem, however, since the Xbox Series S is meant to replace the Xbox One S and the Xbox Series X is meant to replace the Xbox One X.
Would you say that it's sort of like how a 3070 is meant to replace a 2070? The 3070 is more powrful but seems to be intended for gaming at the same resolutions (1080p and 1440p), which seems to be evident based on its 8GB of VRAM, which will be insufficient for games at 4K going forward.
The problem, although it's more of an inconvenience than problem, is that the X is fucking awesome, hardware wise. I would expect a decent leap from the X to the XSS and then a great leap from X to XSX. Otherwise, what's the point?The main upgrades to BC have been 4K. People wanting 4K will have the XSX. I don’t see the problem here.
But it won't hinder next gen......
I couldn't give a shit about BC or its enhancements. But what makes me laugh is Microsoft talked about how great its BC is and now they are giving Series S owners a half baked version.
Sure, but not at $1000 in 3 years, thats just dumb.It takes up to much room in the cupboard that's what it does. Wouldn't you like bc on PS5 ?
The problem, although it's more of an inconvenience than problem, is that the X is fucking awesome, hardware wise. I would expect a decent leap from the X to the XSS and then a great leap from X to XSX. Otherwise, what's the point?
No wonder MS discontinued the X...