Clearly, this was Option 3 that the designer didn't expect the client to pick
E kind of annoys me but it's an ok logo, certainly cleaner than the old one but not an outstanding redesign either.
It's a flat sans-serif with isolated 'cut-out' parts. It's how the trend you dislike first came around lol.I'm actually okay with this, it's not too "geometric" or Helvetic-inspired design, which seems to be a non-stop trend among designers.
Question is... what exactly is the negative space there?
I agree. E shape that they've chosen just rings somehow design tryhard, with no real meaning to it.Don't like it. This would be better imho:
Didn't say anything about 2D or 3D. "Flat" in this context means a minimalist design that uses simple colors, no gradients, no outlines, etc.Better get used to it cos I really doubt 3D is coming back... And good riddance.
Nyehhhh.
Original was way better. Even if it was fairly "old hat" in design it was striking and felt like it embodied a playful spirit of creativity. This looks like I'm looking at every minimalist logo ever, or like it's sponsored by THQ or Bethesda or something.
london2012/10
2003? It looked like early computer 3D graphics you'd find in a 1996 website!Finally. The old logo looked like something straight from 2003.
This is far better. In the new logo all the interaction happens on the bottom of the three and looks like an afterthought thrown in when someone complained the design was boring. If you are going to use a clean, modern font keep the overall design clean and modern.Don't like it. This would be better imho:
Don't like it. This would be better imho: