Mockingbird
Member
Totobeni said::lol :lol
I love this meme it's legendary and works every time
Can someone link to the one that started it all?
Totobeni said::lol :lol
I love this meme it's legendary and works every time
Arkham said:WTF is up with you people who can't recognize a griffin? Bird-dog-rat, rat-cat, bird-dog...! Geezus fuck.
If you saw a unicorn would you think it was an ugly goat-dog-worm?
Dever said:A griffin is a bird-lion. This guy, imo, is clearly a bird-rat.
serious business
jonnyp said:hehehe :lol
I really don't understand all the hate from some posters on here. How can anyone watch that and be totally negative afterwards? I just don't get it.
deepbrown said:![]()
Not a griffin it's a ratcatbird
Lord Error said:Someone please tell me this exists in high res.
Some of the SotC fan art is just incredible.
pseudocaesar said:Not what shit?
You fool, it's clearly a ratcatbirddog.deepbrown said:Not a griffin it's a ratcatbird
It is a type of griffin. They just decided to go a different route with the look of the creature.deepbrown said:[IM]http://www.stuffedlegends.com/images/griffin.jpg[/IMG]
Not a griffin it's a ratcatbird
Well who said it wasn't inspired by a griffin. Just because you look a bit like something doesn't mean you are something.Arkham said:It's still inspired by a griffin. There's a multitude of chimera/griffin myths and this looks like a cool amalgam. Take a look at the beak-like face on one of the long sideshots.
I swear, some of these people must refer to cars as metalwheelcarts.
vas_a_morir said:It's going to be fucking tragic when that baby griffin dies at the end of the game. I'm calling it.
vas_a_morir said:It's going to be fucking tragic when that baby griffin dies at the end of the game. I'm calling it.
GRIFFINS AREN'T REAL! THEY ARE JUST TWO CREATURES BONGED TOGETHER, WHY CAN'T ANOTHER HUMAN BEING CREATE A CREATURE THAT'S TWO DIFFERENT CREATURES BONGED ONTO EACH OTHER!?RavenFox said:It is a type of griffin. They just decided to go a different route with the look of the creature.
deepbrown said:Well who said it wasn't inspired by a griffin. Just because you look a bit like something doesn't mean you are something.
Gravijah said:AND PS GUYS, IT'S A FUCKING RAT, LOOK AT THE TAIL AND LOOK AT THE DAMN FACE!
Mr.Green said:Gryphon is geek chic, griffon is acceptable, but griffin is clearly for the unwashed masses!
dallow_bg said:I wonder if we'll meet his momma.
And how big she must be...
We're having fun. A griffon is a lion/eagle and we think this is something different. Just because we don't have a greek name for the little guy doesn't mean we can't call him a rat/bird.Arkham said:Yeah, but saying "rat-griffin" at least displays that you're aware of some mythological basis. The pure stunned perplexity displayed by people who couldn't do anything but stammer animal names shocked me. GAF is usually sharper than that.
...Like those stupid flying lizard things in Lair. WTF's with those? Man, they were weeeeeird!![]()
deepbrown said:GRIFFINS AREN'T REAL! THEY ARE JUST TWO CREATURES BONGED TOGETHER, WHY CAN'T ANOTHER HUMAN BEING CREATE A CREATURE THAT'S TWO DIFFERENT CREATURES BONGED ONTO EACH OTHER!?
People create the griffin, so why can't we create something else!?
Insane Metal said:IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT ANIMAL IT IS, IT'S EPIC AND THAT'S THE ONLY THING THAT MATTER FFS
Dragmire said:I hated Ico with an unhealthy passion, but that trailer was awesome! Shadow of the Colossus was better than Ico, so hopefully this continues in that direction.![]()
SolidSnakex said:There could be more devs out there that just aren't given a chance. Ueda's said that he has complete control over his projects and that Sony doesn't put pressure on him to do this or that. That's a luxury that even some well known devs aren't given.
Bravo.Vinci said:I don't think so, honestly. Ueda and his team seem uniquely talented in how they perceive gaming and what they can do in it. Think about it like this: Prior to ICO and Shadow of the Colossus, I doubt many - if any - people ever conceived of games like that. There's truly no missing link between what gaming was like at the time of their inception and those products; at least none that I can think of. They both seemed to come virtually out of nowhere, and that's not something you see very often in any medium, least of all in gaming where sequels and spiritual successors rule the day.
When I said Ueda is like Miyamoto, I meant in a sense that they are both able to take gaming and expand upon its current parameters and apparent confines - and go somewhere else with it. Miyamoto has done this numerous times in the past, while Ueda has shown signs of being able to take the cinema style of game design and truly integrate it with gameplay; something that hasn't been done before him, IMO.
I'm not saying that other designers couldn't achieve great things given more freedom; Blizzard proves they could. But like Blizzard, many would probably take what had already existed and simply evolve or perfect it. Ueda seems completely uninterested in simply improving or evolving something that already exists; he wants to express his ideas in the form of an interactive epiphany, a leap.
And that's why I think he's one of the most important people in gaming today, if not the most important.
vas_a_morir said:It's going to be fucking tragic when that baby griffin dies at the end of the game. I'm calling it.
And you're a panda.panda21 said:i'd just like to point out that its a baby griffin, not a ratcatbird
templeusox said:I'm so happy I went out and bought SotC about 3 hours prior to this video leaking. It probably wouldn't be on the shelf today.
Applesauce said: