Comparing the EU to the US is kind of backwards. The EU has no intention of being anything more than a Confederacy. At times I feel it's just a way for Germany to bully everyone else.
What's wrong with George Galloway?
Reluctantly leaning towards 'out'.
I'm pro-European in principle, but I think the EU has become a dysfunctional system crippled by indecision and incoherence. The EU is wracked by crises of its own making, and has proven almost completely incapable of effectively solving them.
The EU needs to be substantially reformed because it's hurting its citizens. But there's very little chance of member-states agreeing to any kind of deep reform package, because the key cultural-political blocs inside the EU (the Visegrad Group, 'Club Med', France, UK-Netherlands, etc) have fundamentally different (and often incompatible) visions for what Europe should become. The European public also appear to have become significantly more hostile to the prospect of a European superstate, and this further restricts the options for empowering coherent system leadership.
The EU looks like a union until it tries to be one. It's the modern Holy Roman Empire, and I think the spectre of stagnancy/Grexit/Brexit/immigration might be Napoleon coming over the hill.
Looking at the individuals involved in the out campaign, I'm always happy to be on the opposite side to Nigel Farage, George Galloway and Michael Gove.
I have no idea, I just want a table or list of all the pros and cons (assuming one doesn't exist) without all the damn hyperbole the campaigners may be giving so I can make a decision based on that and likely scenarios what may happen after. I just don't trust what they (the campaigners) are saying enough to decide... Plus the fact I'm not that informed about the whole situation anyway, so such a thing would be really nice.
Plus I don't really trust a fair portion of our populace to make such a decision anyway...
Out.
I spend far too much time fighting EU legislation that they try to impose on this country.
Big surprise that 9 out of 10 times its designed to pass work from British companies to French or Germany companies (majority of times its French)
The problem with this is that some things are pros to some people and cons to others. For instance membership of the EU leads to partial loss of national sovereignty. To me, I couldn't care less and even think that it is a pro as it leads to a more unified Europe. To others, however, especially nationalists, they see it as a con.I have no idea, I just want a table or list of all the pros and cons (assuming one doesn't exist) without all the damn hyperbole the campaigners may be giving so I can make a decision based on that and likely scenarios what may happen after. I just don't trust what they (the campaigners) are saying enough to decide... Plus the fact I'm not that informed about the whole situation anyway, so such a thing would be really nice.
Plus I don't really trust a fair portion of our populace to make such a decision anyway...
Surely you know that this isn't true. The OECD has pointed out numerous times that the UK is the least regulated EU country and issues over exports to other countries being blocked because of regulation is hardly going to be changed if we leave, if anything it would be worse.Out.
I spend far too much time fighting EU legislation that they try to impose on this country.
Big surprise that 9 out of 10 times its designed to pass work from British companies to French or Germany companies (majority of times its French)
Reluctantly leaning towards 'out'.
I'm pro-European in principle, but I think the EU has become a dysfunctional system crippled by indecision and incoherence. The EU is wracked by crises of its own making, and has proven almost completely incapable of effectively solving them.
The EU needs to be substantially reformed because it's hurting its citizens. But there's very little chance of member-states agreeing to any kind of deep reform package, because the key cultural-political blocs inside the EU (the Visegrad Group, 'Club Med', France, UK-Netherlands, etc) have fundamentally different (and often incompatible) visions for what Europe should become. The European public also appear to have become significantly more hostile to the prospect of a European superstate, and this further restricts the options for empowering coherent system leadership.
The EU looks like a union until it tries to be one. It's the modern Holy Roman Empire, and I think the spectre of stagnancy/Grexit/Brexit/immigration might be Napoleon coming over the hill.
This might be a bit more elementary than what you were looking for:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/guides/zgjwtyc
The problem with this is that some things are pros to some people and cons to others. For instance membership of the EU leads to partial loss of national sovereignty. To me, I couldn't care less and even think that it is a pro as it leads to a more unified Europe. To others, however, especially nationalists, they see it as a con.
The Pro/Con list depends completely on what your goals are.
I think UK is confident that they alone can be a big player alongside USA, Russia, EU and China.
You're using Switzerland as an example? Switzerland doesn't even have access to the single market including for finance. This is why Switzerland have to offshore their banks to London (banks that will, by the way, leave if we do). Switzerland have been finding it increasingly more difficult to do cross-border trade with EU member states. In fact, as price for the very, very limited services that they do receive from the EU they have to accept the free movement of people (something that is a massive issue for many Brits) although to be fair this is being limited next year but this has drastically hurt relations with Brussels and has weakened it's bargaining further and this has damaged student financing and and research money from the EU.No, the UK knows very well that this is impossible. But some people in the UK hope that they can benefit from the EU without beeing a part of it and without contributing.
Switzerland is doing the same thing.
So far its working for them, but unlike the UK, Switzerland was never dependent on global economic influence. And as long as the EU is around them to protect them and be a viable market for them, they're fine. Except maybe their tourism sector, but thats a currency problem.
if the UK wants out, than that is their own sovereign decision to make
This is hilarious when you consider that Jeremy Hunt is sitting with the IN crowd.
Reluctantly leaning towards 'out'.
I'm pro-European in principle, but I think the EU has become a dysfunctional system crippled by indecision and incoherence. The EU is wracked by crises of its own making, and has proven almost completely incapable of effectively solving them.
The EU needs to be substantially reformed because it's hurting its citizens. But there's very little chance of member states agreeing to any kind of cohesive reform package, because the key cultural-political blocs inside the EU (the Visegrad Group, 'Club Med', France, UK-Netherlands, etc) have fundamentally different (and often incompatible) visions for what Europe should become. The European public also appear to have become significantly more hostile to the prospect of a European superstate, and this further restricts the options for empowering coherent system leadership.
The EU looks like a union until it tries to be one. It's the modern Holy Roman Empire, and I think the spectre of Brexit/Grexit/immigration/stagnancy might be Napoleon coming over the hill.
As an American, can someone explain to me why this is happening? Just curious.
Going to read the other thread I saw, maybe I'll find my answer there. Only saw this one
Football Club Nation States, I'd honestly watch an alternate reality where this happened.Out. And then make Scotland free, ignoring the referendum. And also Wales and Northern Ireland. All free. Everyone independent and running their own currencies. And make London its own thing. And let every single county be independent and raise borders and stuff. I'm tired of this bunch trying to be independent from everyone. Like everyone wants to be king.
I swear to gawd, if every time someone wanted to become independent in this country got their way, you would need a passport to cross the street.
What are you trying to say?I'll be voting out, but I'm not surprised Gaf is voting stay.
IN
Our time as an Imperial power is long past, and in a world dominated by multinational corporations and superpowers like the US, China, and Russia we need to be thinking bigger to stay relevant. Leave the EU and we become a historical footnote barely worth the mention. We lose masses of skilled workers, we open ourselves to worsening ability to trade with one of the world's largest free trade blocs, we would STILL be regulated by them for trade but without a say in those regulations...
The EU is not and never has been the problem, just another red herring from the right about a roadblock to our destiny or something. We need to learn to manage our cities and their resources better, as well as record and tax our people more effectively...this whole EU renegotiation is deckchair shuffling.