Same developer as Dear Esther, so yes.Is this like gone home/dear esther ? Im not a fan of that kind of game, would have preffered some kind of puzzles at least
Bloodborne got a nine, so was it a 11/10 ?
Did Dear Esther have running? I don't think it did. Didn't really bother me, I'm not in a hurry.
few hours of lengths keeps me away from buying it.
Do you beat the game by having a nice cold pint and waiting for this all to blow over?
I like you.yes it was. next question.
Do you beat the game by having a nice cold pint and waiting for this all to blow over?
It's $15-$20. I think the cost is fair for the time you will spend.
Someone brought up an interesting point a few posts above: The game is supposedly 6-8 hours I think? With the slow walking speed, I can see how that artificially boosts the playtime.
I imagine adding a faster running option would ruin the game's pacing/narrative. I imagine people are going to be very annoyed with the no sprint. It doesnt have to be a huff-and-puff COD sprint around the world, but a slightly faster walking speed to cut down on some backtracking might be appreciated.
I am avoiding reviews, but is it a big detriment to reviewers? I notice Gamespot noted it as a fault
Yes. The biggest con seems to bem not being able to run
I think I can handle that then.
I think you gentlemen mean 'divisive'.
will wait for a price drop since I have so much to play.
any chance for a physical release?
I mean, this seems to be a con for both people who liked or disliked the game overall. Reviews with bad scores have orher complains too, but no sprint is present in almost every review as bad thing.
Everybody's Gone to The Winchester. An epic tale about one man's journey to find the answer to life's eternal question: can dogs look up?I'll be heading straight to The Winchester.
I'll be heading straight to The Winchester.
so you agree with me? lol
dear esther is just a different way to read a short story....
Yes. The biggest con seems to be not being able to run