Razvedka
Banned
It's been touched on several times in this thread (I don't think I've posted here, but its been a long week so... lol) but:
1. The paper specs seem to favor the XSX at first glance. I completely agree with that, sans SSD and Audio stuff.
2. However, until we find out which box has the more refined APIs + what the 'real world' performance of the silicon is after factoring in all of the dedicated hardware each box uses to offload work from their CPU/GPU/Memory I genuinely think it's up in the air. I can see many instances where the PS5 does outperform the XSX.
I will give you one example of #2. I think, with fairly high confidence, that the PS5 will have substantially more usable memory as a result of the SSD. They won't need the buffer sizes that XSX will for the assets, which translates to more usable memory for the CPU or GPU. Given both systems use the same amount of RAM (16GB) I think this is a pretty safe bet. The only other outlier I can think off of the top of my head is OS memory reservation, but do we know final figures? Last I read both boxes were at 2GB-2.5GB? Is that still true? Or is one smaller than the other?
Against #2's premise is the fact that we've heard several devs already state that the XSX allows to do 'more effects' (stuff like that). So it could well be that the paper specs broadly convey the simple point that Team Green built a graphically powerful box than Team Blue.
1. The paper specs seem to favor the XSX at first glance. I completely agree with that, sans SSD and Audio stuff.
2. However, until we find out which box has the more refined APIs + what the 'real world' performance of the silicon is after factoring in all of the dedicated hardware each box uses to offload work from their CPU/GPU/Memory I genuinely think it's up in the air. I can see many instances where the PS5 does outperform the XSX.
I will give you one example of #2. I think, with fairly high confidence, that the PS5 will have substantially more usable memory as a result of the SSD. They won't need the buffer sizes that XSX will for the assets, which translates to more usable memory for the CPU or GPU. Given both systems use the same amount of RAM (16GB) I think this is a pretty safe bet. The only other outlier I can think off of the top of my head is OS memory reservation, but do we know final figures? Last I read both boxes were at 2GB-2.5GB? Is that still true? Or is one smaller than the other?
Against #2's premise is the fact that we've heard several devs already state that the XSX allows to do 'more effects' (stuff like that). So it could well be that the paper specs broadly convey the simple point that Team Green built a graphically powerful box than Team Blue.
Last edited: