not true otherwise FF15 demo shouldnt be up going by that logic. since the only way to get that is by buying this game.
I understand what you're trying to say, but you're goinng about it wrong. The Jackass and Type-0 reviews were written by different people. Kenneth Shepard wrote Type-0 and Ron Burke did Jackass. So you can't conflate those scores. On the other hand, feel free to check Shepard's other reviews and see if his tastes line up with yours.I'll just wipe off that GamingTrend score from my personal average.. According to them Jackass on NDS was better than this.
Its funny to see someone will play PSP-HD remaster again on handheld
I still wish this got a vita release as well
Damn, reviews go from high to mehh. Not sure what do do now.
That's the price I was lucky enough to get it for . £18.72 to be exact .
Just got my game.. and holy shit this camera is crazy stupid. MASSIVE motion blur at any camera movement.
well that sounds annoying. i thought one of the big things they worked on was the camera :\
Well it's expected that people tend to rate a PSP remaster low on PS4 standards / price.
Personally I'm considering that
* The game got great reception when it originally released in Japan
* It's still the same game except with much better visuals / audio
* I liked when I played it briefly a year ago
I'm sure I'll enjoy it a lot.
I mean I doubt FF7 would get 10/10 reviews if it was released today, but it's still a good game.
Where!?
This is the lowest I found it so far:
http://www.find-game.co.uk/43439-Final-Fantasy-Type-0-HD.htm
£32
Isnt that just the pc port?On that note, it'll be interesting to see what reviews look like for the FF7 PS4 version coming this Spring.
Isnt that just the pc port?
Isnt that just the pc port?
So the consensus story-wise is that the story is more or less incomprehensible and that much of the dialogue is cringe-worthy?
So the consensus story-wise is that the story is more or less incomprehensible and that much of the dialogue is cringe-worthy?
Where!?
This is the lowest I found it so far:
http://www.find-game.co.uk/43439-Final-Fantasy-Type-0-HD.htm
£32
Why can't Final Fantasy games have good stories, anymore?
Actually, if you read the reviews the opinions are quite mixed.
Some saying it's good, some saying it's bad, some don't understanding it.
I got it for under £30 with the game collection. That was with a 10% off code though, so pre ordered xenoblade 3d, bloodborne and type 0 all with the code at all pretty good prices I think.
Now I just want to hope type 0 comes on Wednesday (with the EU demo being live), then I can play it ALL DAY
They never did
By what criteria is the story considered good?
I took about 500 more words to detail that sentiment but, yes, that's exactly the way I felt about its narrative.So the consensus story-wise is that the story is more or less incomprehensible and that much of the dialogue is cringe-worthy?
Went on record expecting a 73-74 Metacritic. Game is currently sitting at 76.
Feel somewhat vindicated after guessing 70-71 Metacritic for The Order: 1886 only for it to sink to 65.
Type-0 makes a poor first impression in its first hours as it begins bombarding players with pages of jargon that it takes no time elaborate on, frontloading the games opening moments with tons of information, but with little exposition. Rather than making an effort to weave explanations into its narrative, Square-Enix treats players to documentary esque slideshows narrated by a disembodied voice, but never bothers to clarify the cause for the war youll find yourself thrown into, nor the roles that most of the people youll see play within the ongoing battle youre participating in. This isnt helped by poor cutscene pacing and moments where some events seem to cut short, even as dialogue is still going on. Entire events within Type-0s narrative go unseen with Square Enix being content to tell, not show, important moments well after the fact.
I'd argue the opposite, but either way, I think they've been pretty consistent in tone and execution over the years (though obviously some aspects have changed with technology). I'm always amazed when someone hates the story of any given FF title but likes others.
The question is, is it actually like FFXIII, where you don't need those encyclopedia entries to understand if you have even a cursory ability to pay attention, or is it undecipherable nonsense without reading the entries?
Maybe the reviewer just didn't play NG+? I've been told it fills all those gaps.http://gamingtrend.com/reviews/final-fantasy-type-0-hd-out-of-its-element/
Well, that pretty much settles it for me.
Kotaku:Type-0’s mobile and portable roots show in the lack of exploration provided.[...]Players can explore during downtime between missions, but that mostly involves covering the same dozen or so areas of the academy, talking to the same non-player characters over and over. It’s a good thing that a sort of fast-forward option exists to move right into the next mission.
Type-0's world is full of NPCs with gloomy things to say, from snarky moogles to treacherous politicians, and in their own little ways, they're more interesting than the main plot ever is. Exploration is encouraged and rewarded with memorable moments.
Sounds like the VB reviewer didn't realize you can leave the academy between missions and go to other towns across the world map, all of which have their own NPCs and sidequests.Which is it? =D
Since when are reviewers expected to play NG+ modes? Have they ever done that? They don't have that kind of time available.Maybe the reviewer just didn't play NG+? I've been told it fills all those gaps.