But seriously though, I won't be surprised seeing this renamed FFXV and shifted to PS4. I'm confident E3 will have something. Confident!
Even if that "something" is "wait until TGS, here is some Lightning Returns, please be excited"?
But seriously though, I won't be surprised seeing this renamed FFXV and shifted to PS4. I'm confident E3 will have something. Confident!
Even if that "something" is "wait until TGS, here is some Lightning Returns, please be excited"?
I think a step back in to exclusivity would be one of the worst things Square could do to the brand now, too.
I think a step back in to exclusivity would be one of the worst things Square could do to the brand now, too.
I think a step back in to exclusivity would be one of the worst things Square could do to the brand now, too.
Lame.
The impact of having a Final Fantasy game in PS4's launch window is severely reduced if the game is also out on PS3 unless Versus on PS4 looks like Agni's Philosophy which I doubt.
IF it is cross-gen, it will be cross-buy. That would allow current gen PS3 owners to play the game, while also having the option of upgrading to PS4 and also playing the game.
I think a step back in to exclusivity would be one of the worst things Square could do to the brand now, too.
Lame.
The impact of having a Final Fantasy game in PS4's launch window is severely reduced if the game is also out on PS3 unless Versus on PS4 looks like Agni's Philosophy which I doubt.
When was Versus multi?
He's talking about all HD titles for consoles being multiplatform. Not just Versus. And I agree with alberto. It IS the worst thing SE can do with Versus at the moment imo. Of course, as someone else has pointed out earlier, it's exclusive because there was most likely involvement from Sony.
Why would SE care about that ? They are here to make money on software sales.
can't wait for E3.. really.
Why would SE care about that ? They are here to make money on software sales.
Plus they would lose whatever is left of their credibility if it wasn't released on ps3.
If Sony was involved they probably would have prioritized it more and had it out by now. I know if I were upper management from Sony involved with the game I'd be pretty damn pissed off about how SE has handled it.
I thought Versus XIII was supposed to be a more "mature" Kingdom Hearts style?
I think a step back in to exclusivity would be one of the worst things Square could do to the brand now, too.
And VersusXIII was revealed before she was born amirite.
No. It would be a good thing. Especially if the game is really good. Get their fanbase back to liking them.
Exclusivity worked wonders for them in the PS1/2 generation. It would of been the same for PS3 if they didn't do the stupid shit they did.
Major changes to the game's design on the scale of what we've seen for Versus XIII is usually indicative of development hell. Changing the overworld style is not a small or easy change, unless they had nothing more than prototypes before it was changed. Things can change during development, but that kind of stuff is supposed to be nailed down before they go full force into production. Otherwise you end up with scope creep tons money wasted on unused content (oh hi FFXIII!)
Edit: Beaten by decoyplatypus
Versus was exclusive, but I am assuming the (discussed in this thread) rumor of it being renamed FFXV is true.
Unless they're going for a simultaneous launch with the PS4. You know. That would probably be why the title isn't out.
Uhhh... What? No. This is untrue. SE would've made vastly more money by going multiplatform than exclusive. It's not about just getting the fanbase. It's about making important business ventures. Also, exclusivity back then and now are nowhere near the same. Why are you comparing them?
.Good, hope this happens with Versus and TLG as well. I bought the PS3 really hoping to play these games.
Uhhh... What? No. This is untrue. SE would've made vastly more money by going multiplatform than exclusive. It's not about just getting the fanbase. It's about making important business ventures. Also, exclusivity back then and now are nowhere near the same. Why are you comparing them?
I'm comparing them cause that's where the fanbase is. On PS. Same for MGS. That's where the majority of the sales come from.
How much extra sales did they get from FF13 on 360?
Did FFXIII actually sell more than any of the PS2 FF's though? I don't think it did. Either way, the game has been PS3 only from the start, so I don't think it would be a bad move on SE's part if Sony was willing to step in.
Also comparing them because of the fanbase is a really bad reason to try and situate Versus. lol.
The ratio of PS3 to 360 was roughly 2:1. So it wasn't bad. It was actually quite good.
2:1 where? Definitely not WW.
I've seen the 2:1 figure before, I don't remember if it's NA or "the west" where the game was multiplatform from the start.
2:1 where? Definitely not WW.
Uh... If it was worldwide, it would exclude JP entirely since there was no 360 version at the time. I'm mere talking about NA with those numbers anyway. Also, even if we're talking about multiplatform, it's a given to exclude Japan honestly.
I'm pretty sure the Asian 360 version was non-existent at that time too though. So it's probably only US and UK who benefits the multiplat.
Also comparing them because of the fanbase is a really bad reason to try and situate Versus. lol.
The ratio of PS3 to 360 was roughly 2:1. So it wasn't bad. It was actually quite good.
I can live with Cross Gen if it's not the same version. I want a beefed up PS4 version.