Wolfgang Jr
Banned
I'd honestly be surprised if it's any more powerful than the CURRENT Switch.
I mean..Some of the best games ever made are 256x224p. Why fix it if it ain't broke? /s
Any idea when we might expect the next Nintendo console? I know they haven't announced anything, but how long would you suppose we have to wait, before the next?
With the switch being so successful I’ll give it 6 years before we get a successor, so around 2023.
They still haven’t even matched 360/PS3’s best looking games, hardware that’s nearly 20 years old.
Nobody is designing their own chips anymore. It comes down to what is available within the parameters of what they are trying to do. There is no more advanced Tegra for the home market - later revisions, and later Nvidia chips in general, target different markets. That’s not to say they’re not working on another one, but Nvidia has found very little success with mobile/SOC outside of Switch.
Edit: Right now, the most advanced mobile SOCs are closer to One S than One X, and those are completely custom designs from Apple who controls the entire stack top to bottom, and on devices they sell for $1000+. So where Nintendo is going to get this One X level processor and put it in a $300 portable system... I don’t know. Not for a while.
Lasik surgery is $300 per eye.
Call it how I see it.
Can you name which are? Because I'm not entirely sure if that's accurate to be honest.
Arms |
Captain Toad: Treasure Tracker |
Donkey Kong Country: Tropical Freeze |
Fire Emblem Warriors |
Mario Kart 8 Deluxe |
Mario Tennis Aces |
New Super Mario Bros. U Deluxe |
Splatoon 2 |
Super Mario Odyssey |
Super Mario Party |
Super Smash Bros. Ultimate |
Yoshi’s Crafted World |
Those are 1080p? Colour me genuinely surprised.I was talking about Nintendo's first-party output who tends to favor 60fps and 1080p on switch. Moreso than any other AAA developer (on any consoles) which tend to target 30 FPS whatver the resolution they are shooting for. The Pro/X era is changing that somehow in giving more PC-like options to the player.
Arms Captain Toad: Treasure Tracker Donkey Kong Country: Tropical Freeze Fire Emblem Warriors Mario Kart 8 Deluxe Mario Tennis Aces New Super Mario Bros. U Deluxe Splatoon 2 Super Mario Odyssey Super Mario Party Super Smash Bros. Ultimate Yoshi’s Crafted World
Call it how I see it.
Guess we could compare the same art style instead.
I own a switch, but you wouldn't believe ones over 12 years newer piece of kit.
It will be just powerful enough to port X1/PS4 (base) games to. So 1-2Tflops. Expecting much more than that is expecting it NOT to be a portable/hybrid like the (massively successful) Switch.
Their current console is at best a handheld tablet that connects to the TV either through a cable or a cheap shitty piece of plastic.
Open your eyes or get your eyes medical check asap
They still haven’t even matched 360/PS3’s best looking games, hardware that’s nearly 20 years old.
if someone told me in 2016 that this was graphics running on a handheld system i'd have laughed at them. shit, i'm still impressed what the Switch can do today. it's an amazing
In a handheld?
Not gonna happen. They will be lucky to reach original XB1 levels.
I will never forget Arkam telling it like it was for the Wii U and everyone (me included, though I was a lurker not a member back then) doing their darndest to bury their heads in the sand.For whatever it's worth, this poster is a dev and broke the Wii U specs back in the day on GAF....and some people took it pretty hard lol
Agreed with this, Nintendo used 2015 chip for Nintendo Switch in 2017.nintendo gonna nintendo.
if you look to them for performance you're gonna have a bad time.
it took them until 2017 to reach 720p. their next major release will probably focus on 1080p as the bottom end. if it's a Switch 2 then we might see docked performance hit 1440-1800p with upscaling to 2160p.
Nintendo's current console is a complete ripoff of the Vita. It's Vita 2.0 if we're being honest. The only difference being that Nintendo knew how to market such a thing in the west, unlike Sony.
I doubt it. Nintendo are wise enough to know they simply cannot compete against MS and Sony in terms of pure hardware. The Xbox One X specs are still very formidable for a home console and I do not think Nintendo is going to ditch the 'hybrid' system they have going on to go back to TV-exclusive consoles. That fancy screen(will probably be OLED for their next console) is a big factor in the cost of their consoles, so performative hardware has to take a backseat.
Well after looking at this article : https://www.gamespot.com/gallery/console-gpu-power-compared-ranking-systems-by-flop/2900-1334/15/ I don't expect it anymore. I was hoping it would because then it would be able to get some of pS5 and Xbox series X third party games on the go. The Switch is only slightly weaker than the Xbox one. So I didn't think it would be too far fetched to think they would go so high. However based on their trends it seems to be too much of a jump.
You've gone too far.We should assume that right? Or is that expecting too much from Nintendo?