jjasper said:Everyone knows its actually DMC4
That would explain that last batch of screens.
jjasper said:Everyone knows its actually DMC4
:lol :lol :lolKafel said:
Ginko said:The "IV"?
Y2Kevbug11 said:so what you're saying is it's not actraiser 3.
Lost Fragment said:I pretty highly doubt that a random, seemingly user-generated blog would be the ones to break this type of news, unless I'm missing something here.
That's not an S-E game.Cruceh said:Breath of Fire? Make it happen.
ethelred said:That being said, this particular blog doesn't have any track record that I know of, and I kinda doubt he's right in exactly what he's saying here. Though who knows, it could happen.
Then we find out they got the roman numeral backwards. OMGOMGOMError said:DQ4!?
omg omg omg omg
Forget who we're talking about?Y2Kevbug11 said:wasn't DQ4 like...already remade?
After thinking about it, we did get DQ123 remade on both portables and consoles...and only DQ4/5 on consoles so far....Y2Kevbug11 said:wasn't DQ4 like...already remade?
DQ3 was remade too, didnt stop the game from having an appareance in the gameboy color.Y2Kevbug11 said:wasn't DQ4 like...already remade?
Stage On said:If FF4 Remake is confiremd then that's it I'm trading in my Fan card becuse I'm sick of this garbage. The gameboy advance version just came out, we don't need another version so soon period.
If it's DQ4 however that would rock. The last remake of that was years ago in the ps1 eta AND never made it stateside to boot. Thought I'd prefer if they started from 1 and worked their way up using the DQ9 engien.
TiVo said:I'd rather have the Final Fantasy VII.
The symbolism of this game on a Nintendo system alone would mean so much.
At last FFVII comes to a Nintendo console. The game that finalized the divorce between Square and Nintendo now helps to renew their marital vows. Be a part of this holy union and join them in bed on their honeymoon.
The money Square is making of GBA & DS games can be used to make the largest DS game evar.
Kafel said:Dragona is under NDA or ... ?
Why should we believe this piece of info without other source given ?
Please speak Dragona.
Kafel said:Please speak Dragona.
Nope. Some blog says a FFIV remake, Dragona hints that it's not FF (but the 'IV' appears to be legit). Nothing confirmed either way.Mejilan said:I'm not reading though 400 posts... is something confirmed real?
OnWarmerMusic said:Nope. Some blog says a FFIV remake, Dragona hints that it's not FF (but the 'IV' appears to be legit). Nothing confirmed either way.
I think it's just wishful thinking on her sideBrandNew said:Er, why would she know?
OnWarmerMusic said:Nope. Some blog says a FFIV remake, Dragona hints that it's not FF (but the 'IV' appears to be legit). Nothing confirmed either way.
charlequin said:I like how your thought process here is apparently "This person is free to tell me more, but has chosen not to do so solely because no one has asked yet!"
Why wouldn't they do that? It's completely within the tech limitations.Ether_Snake said:20,000 views.
Should be fun. Expect FFVII DS remake anytime now! (jk, they would not do that).
dock UK said:Why wouldn't they do that? It's completely within the tech limitations.
2007 = FF4 remake on DS
2008 = FF5 remake on DS
2009 = FF6 remake on DS
2010 = FF7 remake on DS
makes a lot of sense.
Firstly; What would be so bad about FFVII on DS?ethelred said:FFVII is Kitase's. Kawazu's got the earlier games, but Kitase still controls VII and its world, especially as the game is at the core of an active, ongoing compilation project. Good luck with hoping it'll show up on the DS (hopefully it won't, and reasonably/sensibly speaking, the evidence all suggests it won't).
It's reasonable and sensible to think that a port of FF VII on the DS isn't a smart move by Square? lolethelred said:FFVII is Kitase's. Kawazu's got the earlier games, but Kitase still controls VII and its world, especially as the game is at the core of an active, ongoing compilation project. Good luck with hoping it'll show up on the DS (hopefully it won't, and reasonably/sensibly speaking, the evidence all suggests it won't).
It would look better.Baryn said:Remakes are traditionally supposed to look better than the originals, are they not?
kitase may be strong, but even he will soon succumb to the power of the nintendo sideethelred said:FFVII is Kitase's. Kawazu's got the earlier games, but Kitase still controls VII and its world, especially as the game is at the core of an active, ongoing compilation project. Good luck with hoping it'll show up on the DS (hopefully it won't, and reasonably/sensibly speaking, the evidence all suggests it won't).
Baryn said:Remakes are traditionally supposed to look better than the originals, are they not?
Talladega Knight said:It's reasonable and sensible to think that a port of FF VII on the DS isn't a smart move by Square? lol
..pakbeka.. said:kitase may be strong, but even he will soon succumb to the power of the nintendo side