• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Joss Whedon’s leaked ‘Wonder Woman’ screenplay is mindblowingly sexist

Ferrio

Banned
Not a big deal considering she is essentially a hot woman for some reason fighting in a skimpy outfit.

bwXL7oj.jpg
 
How do we know this is legit? I mean, I'm pretty sure I could write something and claim it's an old draft Shane Black wrote fifteen years ago then put excerpts on Twitter.

If it is legit, though... yikes.

Edit: So I actually read the thread properly. Yup. Yikes.
 

SpaceWolf

Banned
I mean to say almost all comics objectify women and men. Why all the complaints now?

pVoZ1_s-200x150.gif


How do we know this is legit? I mean, I'm pretty sure I could write something and claim it's an old draft Shane Black write fifteen years ago then put excerpts on Twitter.

If it is legit, though... yikes.

It's legit. Dependable ol' Bobbers gave us a run through earlier.

This is why it got "leaked"

It's been around for awhile. Someone on twitter broke it back out (after having read it prior and wondering if a revisit would play differently after seeing Jenkins' movie), which is why this thread exists.

It's a real draft from his time on the project.

He & Warners parted ways because he couldn't crack the screenplay to either his or their satisfaction.

To make this more interesting: There are rumors that Whedon's doctoring was not limited to Justice League. That when he was brought in awhile ago (which people didn't learn about until after Snyder left the project) he wasn't just brought in to write Batgirl, but simultaneously to assist in some capacity on both Justice League AND Wonder Woman.

Not sure if that last bit about his helping/assisting with Wonder Woman in any way is at all true (it doesn't seem to be the case, considering his response to the film's marketing as quoted prior in the thread, but who knows).

ANYWAY This draft is a real draft of Wonder Woman by Joss Whedon. The project fell apart due to his inability to get the script where either he or Warners wanted to get it. He later went off to work with Marvel, at which point he helped on large chunks of the Marvel Cinematic Universe and made two Avengers movies before he left Marvel and ultimately went back to work at Warners.
 

Random Human

They were trying to grab your prize. They work for the mercenary. The masked man.
I'd be interested to know what draft number this is and what sort of directions he was receiving from the powers that be, since this doesn't really sound like something he'd write.

Either way, even if he was taking orders from some bonkers producers ala Kevin Smith's famous superhero story, he should've walked from the project.
 
If you call that "mindblowingly" sexist, so do a tons of comic books.

Well, yeah.

It's why that semi-derailing cap of Frank Miller's script for All-Star Batman & Robin has been semi-derailing. People are reading the excerpts of Whedon's script, then seeing a completely unrelated excerpt of a Frank Miller script, and drawing the conclusion the same writer wrote both.

It makes a decent point that even "the good ones" in superhero fiction are sometimes not much more than a degree or two removed from the real pieces of shit if you catch em on the wrong day.
 
So far as the age of the script goes: yes, it's from 10 years ago. And that's not the same as Whedon now (hopefully)

Me 10 years ago (age 29) did/said/thought some pretty regressive shit. I was a grown man, and I still bought into some dumb shit even as I congratulated myself for being progressive & forward thinking. The hypocrisy that MRAs & white supremacists love to call out SJWs for harboring? It's an easy shot because it's aim is often true. Elements of homophobia, transphobia, sexism - that shit was all present in my speech and my personality to some degree or another just 10 yrs ago. All poorly thought out. All stuff that was somewhat accepted and so the freedom to use hurtful language and concepts without repercussion was indulged.

And slowly, over time, and through multiple mistakes and confrontations with people not happy with me and my cavalier attitudes towards hurting innocent people for the sake of a goof, I learned to correct a lot of that horseshit. 10 years is both not that long and also a pretty long time. Most of us here don't even have to vaguely remember 10 years ago. You can click on a user name and SEE what kind of jokes/gags you were engaging in at the same time Whedon was cranking that script out, and the parallels might be a little wince-inducing, too.

BUT:

Whedon was 41 when he wrote that, I believe, and a 41-year-old that had been hailed/praised for avoiding a LOT of the horseshit he was indulging in that screenplay. And a lot of that horseshit had—while toned down some—reared its head in projects current with his work on that script, and after. If he was learning, he was learning slowly, and a 50 year old man making the same mistakes he made at 40, which were already mistakes he probably should have started correcting from when he was 30? There's diminishing patience at play there.

Nobody's saying the man needs to have a perfect track record in the Olympics of Wokeness or whatever (although maybe people are saying that, probably are) but if he's not really moving forward, if he's unwilling to even break down why it is he keeps doing this (and in that interview I posted with Ruffalo, he basically cops to exactly that) then I think the skepticism, if not full-on distrust, is to some degree earned.

Maybe not to the degrees he's currently catching it, and maybe not over a decade-old draft of a project that never got off the ground, but I don't think he's being altogether wronged here, either.
 
Whedon's two best shows are Firefly and Angel—the shows in which he actually centers the narrative on a guy & his friends, and proceeds forward from that point.

If Justice League is Batman's movie (and it probably is) whatever he adds to it will probably be just fine because Angel really isn't much more than Vampire Batman in Los Angeles.
 

hank_tree

Member
What's the point of digging up this 10 year old script to drag Joss over the coals? Slow news day, or just trying to satisfy some other agenda -- like making negativity around Joss' larger role in the DCEU?

I'm just asking questions here...

He's been outspokenly pro-feminism and there are certain groups (think:GG etc.) that make it their goal to find anything to try and tear people like that down.

Similar thing in any Double Fine/ Tim Schafer discussions etc.
 

Veelk

Banned
I'm currently looking for a blog I once read on writing by a female feminist who writes books.

She talks about how she's the most sexist conforming feminist she knows because she has a strong instinct to fall into sexist tropes in her stories on her first drafts. "Hm...I need this character to do something bad....why don't I just have him rape my female protagonist!"

It's not that she isn't aware or doesn't believe these things are wrong or that they have an effect. It's just that because these tropes have been ingrained from other works, this has become the default expression. So she needs to write it down, then go back and re-edit the entire story into something less sexist.

So in regards to Whedon, given his feminist views as well as character work that has dealt with issues of sexism where they both strongly reject toxic stuff, or accept it in some ways (an earlier post talked about how Mal from Firefly tries to slutshame Inara, but does so for reasons of sexual tension), I'm willing to believe that something like this plays into it.

The thing about it is that this being a draft, it wasn't supposed to see the light of day. Which is, for me, the reason I just don't worry too much about this. Drafts are meant to be changed and edited as they went on. And in that space, I'm far more lenient to whatever kind of writing you want to do, because what matter is what gets out to the public eye. If this had been the final draft that was intended to be representative of the movie, then I'd have more of a bone to pick with it. But for me, this is more of a "this is how the sausage is made" sort of situation.
 
The screenplay displays a toxic attitude to Diana, with characters calling her a ”bitch" or a ”whore," and commenting on her skimpy costume. Instead of being a feminist paradise, Themyscira is plagued by infighting and a lack of empathy for outsiders, and Diana even fights her own mother. Then there's Steve Trevor, who overshadows Diana's role from page one.

Steve Trevor spends the entire movie mansplaining to Diana, arguing and criticizing her brand of heroism. It's a startling contrast with Allan Heinberg and Patty Jenkins' depiction in the real movie, where Steve supports Diana, and the two characters enjoy each other's company.

Whedon's vision is completely warped by his own perspective: male, horny, and ashamed. Men are universally depicted as sexist pigs, but this isn't actually beneficial to Diana's role as a feminist hero. Her interior life is barely explored, making it hard to gauge what she thinks or feels at any given moment. By comparison, Jenkins and Heinberg's movie focuses on Diana's emotional journey, depicting her as an optimistic force amid the horrors of World War I. She does face some sexism, but she also befriends men who share her goals and respect her power and agency.

So it was basically Game of Thrones: Wonder Woman edition.
 
I'm currently looking for a blog I once read on writing by a female feminist who writes books.

She talks about how she's the most sexist conforming feminist she knows because she has a strong instinct to fall into sexist tropes in her stories on her first drafts. "Hm...I need this character to do something bad....why don't I just have him rape my female protagonist!"

It's not that she isn't aware or doesn't believe these things are wrong or that they have an effect. It's just that because these tropes have been ingrained from other works, this has become the default expression. So she needs to write it down, then go back and re-edit the entire story into something less sexist. .

Absolutely true btw. Don't know if it applies here, but it's what I do. More cliche than sexist, although sexist is kinda cliche, right?
 

LionPride

Banned
I do remember not being a fan of Joss using Mal slutshaming Inara and the plotline that would've happened where Inara would've been raped by Reavers for character development

He does some well and other things...not so well
 

Veelk

Banned
Absolutely true btw. Don't know if it applies here, but it's what I do. More cliche than sexist, although sexist is kinda cliche, right?

Yup. The point is, everyone has a tendency toward the default in some way. Because it's the easiest and most convenient. To diverge from that takes effort, and many people get there by getting the default option out of their system, so they can move on from there.

You're right that I have no actual proof that this is what happened, but it's why I'm not really concerned about condemning Whedon over this. The drafting stage is the stage where you have no idea what the fuck you're doing and are grasping at whatever bullshit is available. It's not pretty, but it's an essential piece of the process (at least for some people). It is a necessary stepping stone. It If this was intended to be the representative of the final product, then I'd be singing a different tune.
 
I do remember not being a fan of Joss using Mal slutshaming Inara and the plotline that would've happened where Inara would've been raped by Reavers for character development

He does some well and other things...not so well

Joss brought up rape in Firefly before too with that dude in the series finale who kidnapped Kaylee, it's weird

Though I always got the vibe that Mal was presented as in the wrong anytime he did that to Inara
 
Also, for further reading, the end of the twitter thread that inspired the OP features a link to this 2015 essay on Whedon's proclivities as a screenwriter that, paired with his own words in that interview with Ruffalo, paint an interesting (and probably not that inaccurate) picture of what drives him, and how those drives can simultaneously make for great feminist art and also some really boneheaded storytelling decisions. (kind of along the lines of Veelk's friend, in fact)

But didn't Whedon say that the project was scuttled because he couldn't get it to where he wanted it to be?

I said that, but recently he's been framing the decision as more Warner's, and not his. I do remember the initial reports making it out to be a more mutual decision, but his much-more recent interviews have made it seem like he wanted to pursue what he'd written there, and was prevented from doing so by the executives, who didn't have faith in the direction he was pursuing.

Whether the initial description was more accurate or the later ones were, I dunno - but I tend to believe the earlier ones, myself. Which is why I put that one forward.
 

DeathyBoy

Banned
Joss brought up rape in Firefly before too with that dude in the series finale who kidnapped Kaylee, it's weird

Though I always got the vibe that Mal was presented as in the wrong anytime he did that to Inara

There's an episode where he clarifies he's insulting her profession, not her. I think the intent is akin to how he says Book is welcome on his ship, God ain't, but it doesn't entirely work.
 
I just love the reaction for a 11 year old leaked script.

"Joss Whedon the guy known for great female characters is secretly sexist!"

"Joss gonna ruin Justice League!"

This hilarious.

Dont worry guys he will not gonna let Wonder Woman press her ass against Steppenwolf´s face to distract him.
 

Kinyou

Member
I like the point where the author decides that an all-woman society must be without flaws, or else it's sexist.
I don't really get that either. Also isn't it always the case that the Amazons on the island mistrust Steve and aren't all that eager to help the rest of the world? Diana usually has to stand up for him.
 
Top Bottom