Yeah that's what I find hilarious in a summer when movie that won 11 acamedy awards is getting a remake (and both it and the original being based on a book does not make this not a remake) it's fucking Ghostbusters that gets the ire of the remakes are ruining our lives brigade.
I mean no one should be freaking out about remakes/reboots period, because it's literally been part of movies and art in general (see re-mounts in theatre and covers in music) since you know forever. But it's hilariously telling that it's this movie and not Ben fucking Hur that's getting all the heat, certainly has nothing to do with sexism and the toxic side of geek culture, nothing like that at all.
This is a really poor comparison to try and prove your argument, and I'm not disputing some of the Ghostbusters kerfuffle is simply hate and sexism. One is a beloved geek movie, one is a historical epic that I don't think anyone my generation actually has seen. No shit one is going to draw a lot more attention.
Fucking shame they put money ahead of creating a healthy environment for its users. Wouldn't they make more money as more people (like me who tend to stay away from Twitter due to trolls) actually feel comfortable using it knowing harassment would be kept to a minimum?
Doubt it. It'd be a nicer place to be, but that doesn't pay the bills. Being an internet startup that's all about growth leads to stupid business like this where they know their service has a problem but they're wedded to it, and the fact that the people who bitch about Twitter are still using it because they don't see an alternative means it's generally business as usual. Maybe at some point they'll be some huge incident or just a critical mass of all these smaller ones and finally turn people off, but it's essentially similar to hoping Facebook dies. It's possible, but at this point it's got so much inertia behind it and it's outlasted all its competitors.