• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Microtransactions coming to destiny

wwm0nkey

Member
There's a sub. It's just hidden behind their content starved DLCs that you're forced to buy if you want to continue enjoying the game as you bought it.

I'm not against microtransactions but with the amount of money everyone has put into this game at this point, these things should have been free.

Well on the plus side, we wont have to put that money in again with this system. Well until Destiny 2, but I can understand that at least.
 

ironcreed

Banned
I know it's just cosmetic, but damn I'm not okay with a game that already is as expensive as Destiny having any kind of micro transactions.

New (minor) content being free is not enough to justify it, specially since they already had their share of tremendously overpriced content.

Well, I'm not even sure why I'm complaining, I'm pretty much done if this game.

That is the thing. I have spent $120 on this game, which includes buying it a second time. Now, right after they make some great changes and get me back with the new content they announce this shit.

"Oh, it's just cosmetic and all the rest of the DLC will be free!" Gee, that would have been useful info before I dropped another $60 a few weeks ago.
 

Trup1aya

Member
Wish this were the case since the beginning supplementing the cost of the first 2 DLC... Then I wouldn't feel burned buy the fact that I have to spend another $20 on some shitty DLC just to spend $40 on the actual good DLC.
 

RexNovis

Banned
Destiny is the holy grail platform for experimenting with microtransactions and DLC.

They could sell emotes and shaders and emblems and ships, but they could also sell ghost shells and sparrows, any of their resources and currencies (spinmetal, glimmer, motes, strange coins, legendary marks), accelerators, from simple 2x glimmer/XP/rep items to that "start at level 25" item in TTK.

That's before getting into loot or missions (would Xbox players buy those PS4 exclusive strikes and maps if they could?), or more game-changey stuff. Maybe even raids.

All of these are just possibilities, and this is only me musing on them. I don't know anything more than anybody here, but it seems to me like this game was designed for at least some of this to come to pass. And depending upon where they draw the lines this could work out in the game's favor - or better than the expansion model they're using today, which locks non-buyers out of some things.

I'm surprised that they've managed to restrain themselves so far given the game they're working with.

This is a terrifying post. Please don't give them ideas.
 
That is the thing. I have spent $120 on this game, which includes buying it a second time. Now, right after they make some great changes and get me back with the new content they announce this shit.

"Oh, it's just cosmetic and all the rest of the DLC will be free!" Gee, that would have been useful info before I dropped another $60 a few weeks ago.

I'm just curious, but how would the cost of future DLC have affected your purchases?
 
That is the thing. I have spent $120 on this game, which includes buying it a second time. Now, right after they make some great changes and get me back with the new content they announce this shit.

"Oh, it's just cosmetic and all the rest of the DLC will be free!" Gee, that would have been useful info before I dropped another $60 a few weeks ago.

I highly doubt you were going to be able to just skip out on buying the Taken King and get the future free DLC. Most likely you would have still needed it since it's required to hit level 40, and future DLC may raise this level or the new content would require level 40.
 

Bitmap Frogs

Mr. Community
Haha. This is what I said about Uncharted 3.

"Just hats", that's how it always starts.

Pretty much.

Eventually, in-game you will only find drab shit to punish the "freeloaders" (that already paid for the game, mind you) and pressure people to go into the microtransaction shop. I'm getting fucking Warframe flashbacks.
 
Most online games should do this IMO. Release solid game, sell tons of cosmetic shit for money, release free content until the game dies/company moves on.

guild wars 2/halo 5 type shit im good with.
 

wwm0nkey

Member
That is the thing. I have spent $120 on this game, which includes buying it a second time. Now, right after they make some great changes and get me back with the new content they announce this shit.

"Oh, it's just cosmetic and all the rest of the DLC will be free!" Gee, that would have been useful info before I dropped another $60 a few weeks ago.

Well the previous DLC isn't going free, you still need up to TTK but everything after that is free. So it wouldn't have really mattered if you knew this before hand and wanted to play, because you would have still needed to spend the money of TTK
 

hawk2025

Member
That is the thing. I have spent $120 on this game, which includes buying it a second time. Now, right after they make some great changes and get me back with the new content they announce this shit.

"Oh, it's just cosmetic and all the rest of the DLC will be free!" Gee, that would have been useful info before I dropped another $60 a few weeks ago.

Oh, no no, they very likely don't mean something like "and next week TTK will be free!", but rather that TTK has become the "base" game from which more free content will be added to.


This is a terrifying post. Please don't give them ideas.

It's nothing they haven't been constantly and comprehensively been thinking about for years now. It's a matter of what the market and the playerbase will sustain.
 

DNAbro

Member
That is the thing. I have spent $120 on this game, which includes buying it a second time. Now, right after they make some great changes and get me back with the new content they announce this shit.

"Oh, it's just cosmetic and all the rest of the DLC will be free!" Gee, that would have been useful info before I dropped another $60 a few weeks ago.

well TTK is now the base game. So going forward it's free. Since obviously the previous plan made some people upset.
 

ironcreed

Banned
I'm just curious, but how would the cost of future DLC have affected your purchases?

Seeing as it will be free going forward, it kind of makes you wish it would have been this way from the start. But the kicker is right after buying the game again, with all of the new content, this gets announced. Like it was just decided on, which is of course bullshit. Sorry, it just rubs me the wrong way after they already reeled me in for $120.
 

ZangBa

Member
Pretty much.

Eventually, in-game you will only find drab shit to punish the "freeloaders" (that already paid for the game, mind you) and pressure people to go into the microtransaction shop. I'm getting fucking Warframe flashbacks.

Did they change Warframe microtransactions? Last time I played it was really fair and everything was obtainable just by playing a lot, besides colors and whatnot.
 

Quonny

Member
These new free quests are just gonna be more "epic" versions of bounties, most likely. They won't give anything significant freely.
 

Bsigg12

Member
So I read this as these will finance adding missions and quests to existing areas and anything larger with new areas would require a purchase. Maybe I read that wrong though.
 

FyreWulff

Member
That is the thing. I have spent $120 on this game, which includes buying it a second time. Now, right after they make some great changes and get me back with the new content they announce this shit.

"Oh, it's just cosmetic and all the rest of the DLC will be free!" Gee, that would have been useful info before I dropped another $60 a few weeks ago.

A good way to think of it is that Taken King is basically the 'expansion pass' that entitles you to the emotes-subsidized Destiny content that comes out after this point.

You still need to own Taken King to get any of this stuff.
 

hawk2025

Member
From a marketing perspective, it probably helps them to have a "big" content-push every year like TTK got, rather than trying to do it three times a year with smaller and possibly underwhelming content.

Helps renew the Destiny machine every year, even for people that may have quit the game.
 

BreakJohn

Member
I'm hoping that this will be something like Mass Effect 3's MP DLC was, in that you could buy platinum in game to get "packs" which contained gun upgrades but it was completely optional. However ALL character dlc and maps and guns for the multiplayer were completely free and content kept rolling out for over a year with dozens of new maps, weapons, and characters all free. oh and did i mention that said packs with guns you had to "pay" for could be earned? because they could, there wasn't a reason to spend a dime on that MP.

To this day i feel like ME3's MP had it right and offered one of the best microtransaction experience on consoles to date. Hopefully bungie can replicate even a little bit of what Bioware did with their MP and i'll be more than happy with this new change.
 

ElCidTmax

Member
Since a lot of the complaints about this game have been that that there isn't enough content (especially in the base game), then it makes sense for them to save up the big stuff for a Destiny 2, instead of these 'not quite big enough' expansions. I'm sure the free missions etc will mostly be using existing locations and enemies.

I don't really have a problem with cosmetic DLC, but if turns out to be a pay to win situation I hope everyone raises hell about it.
 
The upcoming dlc sure as hell isn't going to be free. Lmao
I'm super curious to see what comes next. They can't just do a year one again and stretch those few new areas into another year's worth of DLC by going through them backwards, or by having bigger versions of the "new" enemies as bosses.

But if DLC 1 and DLC 2 (and especially DLC 2) are what we should calibrate our expectations to, then subsidizing those efforts through vanity DLC and making those subsequent updates free to all players could make some sense.
 

Gav47

Member
If this allows them to speed up the releases of DLC then its a good thing, they need to have things out every 2-3 months not every 5 months. They should break up the pve and pvp elements that would ship in a larger DLC and release them separately
 

Ominym

Banned
That is the thing. I have spent $120 on this game, which includes buying it a second time. Now, right after they make some great changes and get me back with the new content they announce this shit.

"Oh, it's just cosmetic and all the rest of the DLC will be free!" Gee, that would have been useful info before I dropped another $60 a few weeks ago.

This is the part that's got to me. It comes off a super sleazy.
 
Just dances. Doesn't have anything to do with gameplay.

Sure. Imagine how awesome the game would be if they just gave these to you for free since they're really not that important. Destiny is one of the biggest scams this generation with horrible gameplay to boot.

That is the thing. I have spent $120 on this game, which includes buying it a second time. Now, right after they make some great changes and get me back with the new content they announce this shit.

"Oh, it's just cosmetic and all the rest of the DLC will be free!" Gee, that would have been useful info before I dropped another $60 a few weeks ago.


And we still have the, "why does my asshole still hurt" posts lol.
 

Bitmap Frogs

Mr. Community
Did they change Warframe microtransactions? Last time I played it was really fair and everything was obtainable just by playing a lot, besides colors and whatnot.

Methings you have some rose tinted glasses on, Zangba =)

These new free quests are just gonna be more "epic" versions of bounties, most likely. They won't give anything significant freely.

Precisely.

This is just a cash grab to milk the players. And the problem with microtransactions, even cosmetic, is that the temptation is too big and eventually, bit by bit, they fester like a purulent infection and the game becomes just a beacon to attract customers to the microtransaction trap. Very, very few companies have resisted this.

That "free content" is just like the comp at the casino: you might get a free meal but the house knows you'll lose that and more at the tables.
 

mcrommert

Banned
Where does it say that this will pay for expansions....it will pay for events...which are better iron banners and so forth. Those of you who think there will be no more paid expansions before destiny 2 are crazy

Also stop whining...if you don't want the emotes don't buy them
 

Quonny

Member
Where does it say that this will pay for expansions....it will pay for events...which are better iron banners and so forth. Those of you who think there will be no more paid expansions before destiny 2 are crazy

Also stop whining...if you don't want the emotes don't buy them

There is literally no reason why these emotes, shaders, and ships couldn't be rewards for quest chains, random drops, or bought for in-game currency besides money.

They're trying to cut off criticism by going "Look, you get free content now!", when in reality they're only doing this because they'd make more money selling these cosmetic items rather than including them in any expansion. It all comes down to money. And these free quests are going to be text lines and slightly varied objectives on maps we've all seen.

Sure, if you don't like it, don't buy it, but that doesn't mean you can't criticize it.
 

Granadier

Is currently on Stage 1: Denial regarding the service game future
Some random dude's post on the forum is important?

u94XYGB.png


Granted that's in their contract from 2012 and it may have changed, but that's highly doubtful.

source
 
Top Bottom