Deku said:
Eurogamer said:Already, two distinct camps are emerging regarding the technological details of Nintendo's plans. Japanese newspapers have pointed at display technology created by Sharp called Parallax Barrier, which uses an additional layer of LCD on the display to filter light to the left and right eyes of the viewer, thus creating the illusion of 3D.
It's only suitable for small displays and requires the viewer to be positioned pretty much at 90 degrees to the screen - useless for televisions, then, but not such a bad plan for a handheld console.
Others, meanwhile, have noted the existence of a game on the DSiWare shop in Japan which tracks the position of the user's eyes using the camera in the DSi, then changes the perspective on the screen accordingly. When it works well, this technique is uncanny - it effectively allows you to tilt your head to the side in order to peer in a different direction, giving the impression that the screen is a window onto a different world.
It's not stereoscopic 3D, of course, but it could be even more useful from a game design perspective. Moreover, it won't give anyone headaches and could be accomplished using a combination of cameras and motion-sensing technology - a field in which Nintendo is now extremely accomplished.
It's worth noting at this juncture that whatever Nintendo is doing, it can't be both things. They're mutually exclusive, since one relies on the user's head staying quite still in front of the screen, and the other is based on the idea of moving the eyes relative to the screen.
Yeah, I own it and the holographic dino thing that came with it... might still be around here somewhere.Cow Mengde said:Yeah, the box was something like that. The head shifts and bursts through the logo depending on the position you see it.
Serious, nobody else here owns this movie on VHS!?
Headtracking technically isn't 3D in the sense that it offers depth perception, so that'd work for someone with one working eye.Willy105 said:Then you never will actually be able to see 3D of any kind.
BlackNMild2k1 said:Isn't that article very wrong about one thing?
There was a that video from CEBIT (linked to about a dozen times) that showed the 3DTV that did both, and that was exactly what I was hoping Nintendo was using for the 3DS.
A 3D screen that not only shows depth, but has a layer that seemingly pops off the screen, and the angle of viewability of which can be manipulated by tracking your face using the camera at the same time (points to 3D hidden Image and the floating anime girl videos)
Does that not seem realistic?
Can we also mix all that with the ability to do this too:
cyber maid augmented reality
Yeah, if there's one thing this announcement has made very clear, it's that the majority of the public have no fucking clue when it comes to 3D. Some of the expectations I'm seeing are just completely irrational and absurd. Holographic shit? C'mon. It's going to be a real brain-bender for the average Joe.Deku said:Article is wrong on many levels and not just on its technical equivocation or intentional misrepresentation between Nintendo's mention of 3D /no glasses and the headtracking meme that seems to get associated with the announcement. I was just pointing out people are still writing tripe based on their initial impressions of the missive
cory said:This is a lenticular poster I have in my dorm:
HAL_Laboratory said:Yeah, if there's one thing this announcement has made very clear, it's that the majority of the public has no fucking clue when it comes to 3D. Some of the expectations I'm seeing are just completely irrational and absurd. Holographic shit? C'mon. It's going to be a real brain-bender for the average Joe.
edit: my favorite response to 3D by FAR is when someone says "but games are already in 3D". :lol
Which is why we'll have to develop some sort of terminology to differentiate the "3-D" that we've been enjoying since the Playstation and N64, and the "into and/or out of the screen" 3-D that the 3DS is supposed to employ. I don't know how to go about doing that though. :lolHAL_Laboratory said:edit: my favorite response to 3D by far is when someone says "but games are already in 3D". :lol
Skiesofwonder said:I got a feeling that a lot of people are going to be disappointed when E3 comes around....
Doorman said:Which is why we'll have to develop some sort of terminology to differentiate the "3-D" that we've been enjoying since the Playstation and N64, and the "into and/or out of the screen" 3-D that the 3DS is supposed to employ. I don't know how to go about doing that though. :lol
Semi-edit: I'd keep expectations tempered for now, HAL. Remember, this is the same Nintendo that let people speculate about 1:1 swordfighting controls for the original Wii Remote and promised that "you will say wow" to the graphics. Well...people did say wow, but not in the way they expected. I too think that we're going to see something impressive here, but I'm remaining tentative until E3.
HAL_Laboratory said:Yeah, if there's one thing this announcement has made very clear, it's that the majority of the public have no fucking clue when it comes to 3D. Some of the expectations I'm seeing are just completely irrational and absurd. Holographic shit? C'mon. It's going to be a real brain-bender for the average Joe.
edit: my favorite response to 3D by far is when someone says "but games are already in 3D". :lol
Their chances of appearing are that low that you should simply wish for their return on any console, and even then, you'll still be asking for too much.yankee666 said:I was just thinking about a cuople of games i love to see on this new console.
- Luigi Mansion 3D
- Pikmin 3-D
- Wave Race 3D
- Rouge Scuadron 3D
- Pilotwings 3D (its been a long time since the last one)
You're right, expectations should be kept to a reasonable level. But to be fair, they did say the emphasis (regarding Wii) was not purely on graphics this time around but that we would say "wow". So they downplayed it slightly. They never issued a press release saying "1:1 swordfighting" either.Doorman said:Which is why we'll have to develop some sort of terminology to differentiate the "3-D" that we've been enjoying since the Playstation and N64, and the "into and/or out of the screen" 3-D that the 3DS is supposed to employ. I don't know how to go about doing that though. :lol
Semi-edit: I'd keep expectations tempered for now, HAL. Remember, this is the same Nintendo that let people speculate about 1:1 swordfighting controls for the original Wii Remote and promised that "you will say wow" to the graphics. Well...people did say wow, but not in the way they expected. I too think that we're going to see something impressive here, but I'm remaining tentative until E3.
Cow Mengde said:Yeah, the box was something like that. The head shifts and bursts through the logo depending on the position you see it.
Serious, nobody else here owns this movie on VHS!?
HAL_Laboratory said:You're right, expectations should be kept to a reasonable level. But to be fair, they did say the emphasis (regarding Wii) was not purely on graphics this time around but that we would say "wow". So they downplayed it slightly. They never issued a press release saying "1:1 swordfighting" either.
This press release, on the other hand, says "3D effects without the need for special glasses". Pretty obvious what to expect, fundamentally. It also says this hardware is a successor to the DS, not a machine that does what DSi can already do with camera tricks.
I think it's fully reasonable to expect a true 3D console.
Somnid said:For some reason when new hardware is known people's natural brain inhibitions come unhinged and people will start thinking of the stupidest shit as a possibility that they normally wouldn't. Remember the $300 PS3 rumors? Yeah that's how fucking dumb people become without total information.
Also when it comes to Nintendo I find it hilarious when people even give a notion of credit to anything coming from western developers. The reality is that not a single one knew the 3DS had a 3D screen until they saw the exact same press release we did. And of course they wouldn't, Nintendo doesn't release information to anybody early. This is why I firmly believe all the GDC rumors are bullshit. These guys have nothing close to a dev kit and Nintendo has not talked directly to a damn one of them. They are working on internal rumors of what they think the next DS is supposed to be.
So all the 3DS games will have that twitching movements? :lolPsy-Phi said:This image is much cooler.
Stare at that for a few seconds, better 3d than I've seen with glasses on.
HAL_Laboratory said:Safest expectation anyone in this thread can have is that 3DS will be in, you got it, true 3D.
It will be 3D.
Not camera tricks, but real fucking 3D. It says so plain as day in the press release. There's no way they would have released that shit if it wasn't going to be true 3D. Look at the public's reaction -- the news touched every media outlet in the world. Nintendo has enough experience with this shit to know what was going to happen. They are coming out with a real 3D console. Any other assumption is based purely on negativity or denial.
I don't understand why everyone wants a 2nd stick. It has a very specific usage that is almost entirely limited to the kind of games that have no place in a handheld.Baki said:Why only one analog stick?
Somnid said:Also when it comes to Nintendo I find it hilarious when people even give a notion of credit to anything coming from western developers. The reality is that not a single one knew the 3DS had a 3D screen until they saw the exact same press release we did. And of course they wouldn't, Nintendo doesn't release information to anybody early. This is why I firmly believe all the GDC rumors are bullshit. These guys have nothing close to a dev kit and Nintendo has not talked directly to a damn one of them. They are working on internal rumors of what they think the next DS is supposed to be.
Deku said:I'm sure EA know and Nintendo told other key developers at GDC.
Father_Brain said:Considering that the system is launching in less than a year at the latest, the idea that no Western devs had dev kits as of GDC is pretty absurd.
Psy-Phi said:This image is much cooler.
Stare at that for a few seconds, better 3d than I've seen with glasses on.
Why do they have to explain it?Haunted said:Well, judging from the all-around cluelessness about Stereo 3D gaming displayed in this thread, it really looks like Nintendo will have a hell of a time to explain this tech to the average guy.
Nintendo doesn't have to try and explain to the average guy how the technology works. Their job is just to find ways to show it off to those people and get them interested in the effect of it. I'm sure a ton of people who own Wiis don't know anything about accelerometers or infrared signals, they just know that there's a sensor bar next to their TV and they can bowl with their remote. The only people that really care HOW it works are already the people speculating here.Haunted said:Well, judging from the all-around cluelessness about Stereo 3D gaming displayed in this thread, it really looks like Nintendo will have a hell of a time to explain this tech to the average guy.
That's the thing, they don't need to explain. It's even better if they don't even try: just have people see it working at kiosks and have their brain melt at trying to understand glass-free 3D, right before they proceed to buy three units each.Haunted said:Well, judging from the all-around cluelessness about Stereo 3D gaming displayed in this thread, it really looks like Nintendo will have a hell of a time to explain this tech to the average guy.
Yeah 2nd analog stick is just not going to happen.M3d10n said:I don't understand why everyone wants a 2nd stick. It has a very specific usage that is almost entirely limited to the kind of games that have no place in a handheld.
Epiphyte said:Why do they have to explain it?
M3d10n said:I don't understand why everyone wants a 2nd stick. It has a very specific usage that is almost entirely limited to the kind of games that have no place in a handheld.
M3d10n said:I don't understand why everyone wants a 2nd stick. It has a very specific usage that is almost entirely limited to the kind of games that have no place in a handheld.
It's 3D, what do you expect?Xater said:I can#t believe this thread got this big.
Xater said:I can#t believe this thread got this big. E3 is going to kill GAF...again
I can't imagine that working very well.HAL_Laboratory said:3D games like Monster Hunter would work fine with one analog stick. You don't need two. One analog stick and the stylus would suffice.
Xater said:I can#t believe this thread got this big. E3 is going to kill GAF...again
EatChildren said:The DS isnt a system that is simply trying to replicate a console as a portable, and the 3DS wont be any different. Two screens, touch screen, one analogue stick. Not two because its not trying to be a portable GameCube.