hands down one of the best Disney villainsBest part of PATF was Doctor Facillier's song.
"Friends on the Other Side" is amazing
too bad he was in such a mediocre movie
hands down one of the best Disney villainsBest part of PATF was Doctor Facillier's song.
"Friends on the Other Side" is amazing
The whole point of those tests is so that the animators would know what to go for and how the characters should be animated. And they captured it wonderfully. It's literally just the 2D style captured in 3D.
Lmfao that couldn't have been made to be anything other than a joke right? There's multiple distinct reasons why simpler styles and character designs are the norm in western animation. Less is more philosophy=easier for the audience to remember the character design, easier to animate so that the end result looks better being two of the biggest reasons. Anime has some shit tier animation more often than not, and not so coincidentally, the most memorable ones don't use insanely detailed designs.
Did Glen Keane bail out of Disney because frozen was not made in 2D?
The short he did for Motorola Spotlight is stunning. If you think the animation is stunning in 2D, you're missing how amazing it looks when you're using it on a Moto X, where you can pan left and right to change perspective, watch the story progress, and just feel more involved. It's a beautiful piece of work.
How smooth does it look there? I've read that he animated it at 32 frames per seconds to be played at 60. (so basically animated at 2s but for 60 instead of 24).
Not really, it had a huge budget. The genre is dead now.
More Tangled gifs. I really like how the film looks, especially on Blu-Ray, but having it done in traditional animation would've been neat.
2D animation will have a comeback once people eventually get tired of 3D animation.
Good to know that's a troll image. Also the same face thing seems is pure coincidence to me. Less so in Frozen, because it's not that weird that two sisters and their mother would look very alike.I'd argue he was kinda a crappy villain all things considered but he was played really well
with that said the 2D doesn't have the "same face" look the 3D models have
That was a troll image.
Good to know that's a troll image. Also the same face thing seems is pure coincidence to me. Less so in Frozen, because it's not that weird that two sisters and their mother would look very alike.
I think he accomplished his task, I never once thought that the characters looked like Rapunzel and was surprised by all the comparisons, was so strange but internet is gonna internet.IIRC, the lead animator on Frozen said that Anna & Elsa's faces were the hardest part of Frozen, because the higher-ups insisted that they had to be "Pretty, like Rapunzel." He basically had no freedom to work with their faces, but he still had to make sure that their faces somehow conveyed personalities that were different from each other (and Rapunzel). He was very proud of what he was able to accomplish, even though people accused him of sameface.
If you notice, all of the men in Frozen have unique faces, and none of them look like Flynn.
"Historically speaking, animating female characters are really, really difficult, cause they have to go through these range of emotions, but theyre very, very you have to keep them pretty and theyre very sensitive to you can get them off-model very quickly,"
Seeing the pencil tests makes the animation seem so alive. It's really incredible to behold.
Also, I'd say Tangled is still the closest CG has gotten to the 2D animation style. Frozen was a step back (but still nice). Glen Keane really did wonders directing the Tangled team to bring 2D philosophies to 3D.
It's coming back I think. Disney is trying to nail the 2D look in 3D.
Yep the animation in Tangled is a wonderful achievement. Frozen is not really close.
o
m
g
Which Earth-# did this version exist on
I need to phase there permanently
Holy hyperbole. The facial animation in Frozen was awesome with a lot of nuances. And of course the snow effects, and the entire let it go sequence, actually, all of the songs had some wonderful animation.Tangled moved beautifully. Frozen was boring and there was nothing memorable about the animation. Agreed.
I'll never buy the statement that 2D animation dwindled because of CGI animation. It dwindled because the majority of CGI animated movies made starting in the late 90s had better stories, characters, and execution. There were perfectly good 2D films too, but on the whole they were inferior. Then some executives took a look at the data and determined that the CGI movies were making more money than the 2D ones and assumed it was because people loved the technology, instead of contemplating that maybe they were just better films. And then Princess and the Frog was merely okay, and Winnie went up against Harry Potter. How could anyone expect those movies to be smash hits? But nope, it must be because nobody likes 2D animation anymore.
Also, just rewatched Fantasia the other day. That movie is still one of the best-looking things I've ever seen.
Lmfao that couldn't have been made to be anything other than a joke right? There's multiple distinct reasons why simpler styles and character designs are the norm in western animation. Less is more philosophy=easier for the audience to remember the character design, easier to animate so that the end result looks better being two of the biggest reasons. Anime has some shit tier animation more often than not, and not so coincidentally, the most memorable ones don't use insanely detailed designs.
Indeed.Seeing the pencil tests makes the animation seem so alive. It's really incredible to behold.
Also, I'd say Tangled is still the closest CG has gotten to the 2D animation style. Frozen was a step back (but still nice). Glen Keane really did wonders directing the Tangled team to bring 2D philosophies to 3D.
2D animation will have a comeback once people eventually get tired of 3D animation.
I find statements like this to be strange. I hear similar statements about going back to practical visual effects. It's like saying "Black-and-white film will have a comeback once people eventually get tired of color."
Yeah. Anime is usually drawn on fours (One drawing for every four frames of film, or 6 frames per second) while American animation is usually drawn on twos (12 fps) and some of the higher-budget stuff (Disney features, for example) is drawn on ones (24 fps).
A lot of productions will animate at multiple framerates (Say, twos for a dialogue scene and ones for an action scene) so these are generalities.
They were idiots for pitting Winnie against Harry Potter.
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WMeTL1seIWo
WHAT WERE THEY THINKING?!?!?
I find statements like this to be strange. I hear similar statements about going back to practical visual effects. It's like saying "Black-and-white film will have a comeback once people eventually get tired of color."
Holy hyperbole. The facial animation in Frozen was awesome with a lot of nuances. And of course the snow effects, and the entire let it go sequence, actually, all of the songs had some wonderful animation.
And they did a lot of playing around with making the two sisters having different personalities,
When you say 1 drawing every 4 frames, do you actually mean 1 drawing (with duplicates in between), or 1 keyframe drawing?
Are those suppose to be analogies? It's not like 2D is some antiquated method of animation that was moved past because CG was the way of the future. It's not like people are advocating going back to purely hand drawn 2d, but digital 2d animation is just as viable nowadays as CG
http://i6.minus.com/i0j5XpMmQkvC4.jpg[IMG][/QUOTE]
If a robot were to do art, this is probably what it'd come up with.
This dude would probably slap Alex Ross' shading over Mike Mignola's art, too.
[quote="Not The Droid You're Looking For, post: 147867134"]More Tangled gifs. I really like how the film looks, especially on Blu-Ray, but having it done in traditional animation would've been neat.
[img]http://38.media.tumblr.com/ee5f30ddef12966295a56c7a17d74e8e/tumblr_mwo7vs4kP71stqenpo1_500.gif
I'm waiting for a resurgence of black and white myself
People will never be tired of 3d animation as it's always looking better and better with each big film.
This will never happen.
I find statements like this to be strange. I hear similar statements about going back to practical visual effects. It's like saying "Black-and-white film will have a comeback once people eventually get tired of color."
CG probably made the ice palace stuff in Frozen much easier so I can see a case for it there.Out of their latest releases I think Wreck it Ralph was the only one that benefited from being in 3D.
From the look of those gifs Tangled would've looked a lot better in 2D.
It's more like people are saying that CGI is supposed to be a temporary thing, and that people should abandon it and move back to traditional methods.
One of these days I'll make a Don Bluth thread
But today is not that day.
I made a Don Bluth thread a while back but it only focused on his early four movies (Nimh, American Tail, Land Before Time, All Dogs) so I would love to see a thread that got more into his obscure stuff. His art is so beautiful and charismatic. I don't really know what he's up to now but it'd be great if someone was willing to produce another movie of his. Anastasia and Titan AE proved he still had it even after his flops.
Did you all hear about the Anastasia stage musical they're working on? I hope it pans out.
No, that's hardly it. There's a lot more expressiveness in the faces, especially in the second gif, than I ever saw in Tangled.Sounds like a nostalgia bias talking
No, they're really not as expressive. And that makes me sad.The whole point of those tests is so that the animators would know what to go for and how the characters should be animated. And they captured it wonderfully. It's literally just the 2D style captured in 3D.
There's a lot more personality in these gifs than in the 3D models... :-\