• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Online console shooters with no auto-aim

Grinchy said:
LOL

You really are a part of the master race. Let me bow down to you because when I think of gaming, I think of playing the game.

The way people act online, you wouldn't think so.When I used to play on Live, it was serious business, then I started playing PC shooters and I have think why I ever played on a console.I think it is just ignorance why people stay playing console shooters.
 
Of course, avid pc gamers would come into a console specific thread about console specific titles and start spewing bullshit, making the sane pc players look bad in the process lol
 
abstract alien said:
Of course, avid pc gamers would come into a console specific thread about console specific titles and start spewing bullshit, making the sane pc players look bad in the process lol
The "PC Master Race" derail is the most logical and expected derail for this thread.
 
kokujin said:
There's still a small amount in there.

One thing I don't get is why are console shooters so popular.They have aim assist, inaccurate controls, and worse graphics and frame rate.I'd think if someone was serious about playing these games they would want the best experience available, but it's not the case.

There is a "couch edition" .gif around here someplace...
 
abstract alien said:
Of course, avid pc gamers would come into a console specific thread about console specific titles and start spewing bullshit, making the sane pc players look bad in the process lol
I predominantly play console games, I paused my Genesis to type this, but I try to play games on platforms where they work best.
 
kokujin said:
I predominantly play console games, I paused my Genesis to type this, but I try to play games on platforms where they work best.
Good luck with playing the OP in a few games of Socom 4 on your pc then. I'm out, since I don't actually have anything useful to contribute to the thread title and topic at hand lol

*bails out*
 
Grinchy said:
Some people like to be able to put a disc into a system and have it play their game without hours of fiddling around with settings and editing ini files.

Assuming we're talking about a non-technical PC user:

Install Game.
Launch Game.
Settings: Set Resolution, Choose pre-set graphics option
Play

Really, it's not that hard, and it isn't that different from consoles with their updates and installation nowadays.

With that said, it's all preference which to use control-wise and it doesn't really matter as long as KB/M is segregated from controller users.
 
KZ3 with move is pretty much the best aiming experience you can get in an online shooter without playing on PC.
 
kokujin said:
There's still a small amount in there.

One thing I don't get is why are console shooters so popular.They have aim assist, inaccurate controls, and worse graphics and frame rate.I'd think if someone was serious about playing these games they would want the best experience available, but it's not the case.

Even if you don't care for dual analog, many people do. I know people that have played FPSs on PC, and still prefer them on consoles. Also, some people really aren't bothered by lower end graphics or frame rates.

Personally, I prefer shooter controls on PC, Wii/DS, and then the other consoles, but I certainly consider dual analog to be a playable scheme and I have had no problem enjoying dual analog shooters in the past. I only draw the line at N64-era shooters; I can't touch those.

As far as the graphics and framerate go, I'm not extremely picky. I certainly prefer a silky smooth and gorgeous experience, but most often, I'll have no problem playing something that compromises somewhere, as long as the game is built on a solid foundation.

EDIT: For the record, I don't necessarily see aim-assist, in all of its forms, as a bad thing. It can be implemented well or poorly, just like any other aspect of gameplay.
 
TheExecutive said:
There is a "couch edition" .gif around here someplace...

derail aside, i never got this point...

my pc is hooked up to a 32'' monitor on my living room infront of my couch.
if for some crazy reason you like playing with a pad, u can use a pad with a pc.

also, u dont have to upgrade a pc every year. do it once a gen and u will still be far ahead of the console curve.

the only real argument against playing on PC is 'convenience', exclusives, or userbase.
 
i always like to turn the aim assists off, but if the game has it on by default its annoying to know that the other players have this advantage.

MAG and BFBC2 are quite fandabbybabulous :D
 
Kalnos said:
Assuming we're talking about a non-technical PC user:

Install Game.
Launch Game.
Settings: Set Resolution, Choose pre-set graphics option
Play

Really, it's not that hard, and it isn't that different from consoles with their updates and installation nowadays.

With that said, it's all preference which to use control-wise and it doesn't really matter as long as KB/M is segregated from controller users.
Not when the games do not work because of some directx settings or because of a 64bit machine or driver issues. Your average gaming Joe will have no clue what to do in such situations and that's one of the few MAJOR advantages of console gaming.
 
I can't play without some aim assist. Dual analog controls just aren't accurate enough (or maybe I just suck). Obviously a mouse is a lot more accurate, but I can't stand moving with a keyboard. So, overall I'd rather play with dual analog + aim assist.
 
ArachosiA 78 said:
I can't play without some aim assist. Dual analog controls just aren't accurate enough (or maybe I just suck). Obviously a mouse is a lot more accurate, but I can't stand moving with a keyboard. So, overall I'd rather play with dual analog + aim assist.
If they could mix an analog stick for movement with a mouse for aiming it would be perfect.I hate moving with asdw, but I hate aiming with a stick even more.
 
kokujin said:
One thing I don't get is why are console shooters so popular.They have aim assist, inaccurate controls, and worse graphics and frame rate.I'd think if someone was serious about playing these games they would want the best experience available, but it's not the case.

I disagree, because I think that competitive play requires players having about same advantages and disadvantages in their gaming environment. And inaccurate controls with aim assist for all is a part of that.
 
Joe White said:
I disagree, because I think that competitive play requires players having about same advantages and disadvantages in their gaming environment. And inaccurate controls with aim assist for all is a part of that.
But it is very limiting.
 
Grinchy said:
Some people like to be able to put a disc into a system and have it play their game without hours of fiddling around with settings and editing ini files.
Yeah , no thats not how it works.

I don't even have to put a disc in my syste, I get from pressing my shortcut to playing about 4-5 times faster than going from putting in the disc to playing on a console too.
Loading times between maps are almost non existant and I don't have to stare at lobby countdowns for minutes on end between every match.
The latter especially does my head in when playing anything on a console, you barely get to frigging play.

Configs are options, optional, you CAN configure things to be more to your liking.
On consoles you are always stuck at the default settings wether you like it or not.


@FTH: You aren't goig to tell me the exlusives are a reason to play shooters on consoles right?
I get the couch argument (sort of), but pc has a way way wider array of exlusives to choose from when it comes to fps games.
Most of them are of much higher quality too.

Halo might have been the only fps type that you couldnt really find on pc , but that changed when section 8 was released 2 years ago, and now prejudice is out too.
 
kokujin said:
If they could mix an analog stick for movement with a mouse for aiming it would be perfect.I hate moving with asdw, but I hate aiming with a stick even more.

Yeah, that would be cool. Seems like it should be possible. I wonder if there's a way to use the Wii nunchuck attachment plus a mouse. There's gotta be a way to get that to work.
 
kokujin said:
If they could mix an analog stick for movement with a mouse for aiming it would be perfect.I hate moving with asdw, but I hate aiming with a stick even more.

i sometimes use a Frag FX:
FragFX_Shark.jpg

edit: updated the pic for a more modern version :P
 
ArachosiA 78 said:
Nice...I would totally get that Frag FX controller if I had a modern PC or if the PS3 had any shooters I cared for.
I thought it only worked for the PS3, if it works with the PC I am picking one up.
 
Ydahs said:
Not when the games do not work because of some directx settings or because of a 64bit machine or driver issues. Your average gaming Joe will have no clue what to do in such situations and that's one of the few MAJOR advantages of console gaming.


More expected from an Indie game than a generic AAA title.
 
SneakyStephan said:
Yeah , no thats not how it works.

I don't even have to put a disc in my syste, I get from pressing my shortcut to playing about 4-5 times faster than going from putting in the disc to playing on a console too.
Loading times between maps are almost non existant and I don't have to stare at lobby countdowns for minutes on end between every match.
The latter especially does my head in when playing anything on a console, you barely get to frigging play.

Configs are options, optional, you CAN configure things to be more to your liking.
On consoles you are always stuck at the default settings wether you like it or not.


@FTH: You aren't goig to tell me the exlusives are a reason to play shooters on consoles right?
I get the couch argument (sort of), but pc has a way way wider array of exlusives to choose from when it comes to fps games.
Most of them are of much higher quality too.

Halo might have been the only fps type that you couldnt really find on pc , but that changed when section 8 was released 2 years ago, and now prejudice is out too.

51AD98SB09L._AA300_.jpg
51NMqzZggfL._AA300_.jpg
 
Shambles said:

I actually have halo CE pc , but the netcode was so awful that I blocked it out of my memory :p, that or it used p2p connections, can't really remember, I just remember that at the time it was unacceptable.

Tried to play some halo CE online on my xbox too before the pc version was released (you put it in lan with your pc, then run a prog on your pc that makes the xbox think it's in lan, and allows you to connect to other ip's) but the p2p lag made it awful. (all my friends with the game agreed on that too).

From our point of view the p2p standard today is just baffling, we didn't even want to deal with that shit when playing halo online was a wet dream for gamers.
 
kokujin said:
One thing I don't get is why are console shooters so popular.They have aim assist, inaccurate controls, and worse graphics and frame rate.I'd think if someone was serious about playing these games they would want the best experience available, but it's not the case.
I'm with you man. Can't understand this thing at all. If I want to play FPS or RTS - I play'em on PC. If I want play arcade games or fightings - consoles is my choice.
 
ArachosiA 78 said:
I checked it out on Amazon. Apparently it works with PS3, PC and Mac. It's 90 bucks though.
Kind of steep I'll read up on it some.

The_Player said:
I'm with you man. Can't understand this thing at all. If I want to play FPS or RTS - I play'em on PC. If I want play arcade games or fightings - consoles is my choice.
Same with me, awesome avatar, Contra HC is my 2nd favorite game of all time(1st is Alien Soldier)
 
SneakyStephan said:
Yeah , no thats not how it works.

stuff
yeah no, this is not what the discussion is about. It was supposed to be about auto aiming, until the pc gamers had to muck it up into gamebox warz.
 
SabinFigaro said:
I... really had no idea many console shooters had auto-aim online. Why?
Because aiming with a controller doesn't work well, halo CE on xbox was lauded for being the first console shooter to come up with an auto aim system that allowed you to hit stuff while still being a bit subtle (it was strong aim assist though) and without feeling like it took control away from you.

It still puts kz2's annoying aim assist to shame.


That was in a time when a gaming pc cost 1500 dollars and kids took what they could get.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDVcNj9HrgE
This is what happens when a pc game gets ported to consoles without mouse support and without auto aim.
It's not pretty.

http://www.youtube.com/user/ALM1GHTY360#p/u/27/USLnrSowwZo
This is a game with auto aim from the same guy, suddenly he can 'aim'.
Pretty huge difference.


This is the pc game without auto aim again on pc: (by a great player)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iPfaQJuWGvU&t=4m30s

For some reason showing this comparison in an auto aim topic pisses people off, but I think it's very valid...
 
kokujin said:
But it is very limiting.

Thats how I like it. I prefer competitive LAN-gaming in monitored environment where players have identical hardware and are allowed to configure controls, but not graphics. I've always hated how competitive players configure games look on their own PCs.

Console gaming at least provides similar hardware and graphics for every one.
 
kokujin said:
Of course, but it's not a problem because most of them aren't that good.
I'll admit btw that uncharted 2 is pretty unique n well made online.
I couldn't get used to it though, the disconnect with the controls kept bugging me endlessly it wasn't worth it.

That's one game I'd like to see get ported to pc.
 
The_Player said:
cant_tell_if_trolling.jpg
Wat

I can't play Gears 3 or Uncharted 3 on a PC. People stay playing console shooters because the experience isn't replicated on another platform. No PC game plays exactly like Killzone 3, that is why people play console shooters.
kokujin said:
Of course, but it's not a problem because most of them aren't that good.
Ookay well, you live in your world I live in mine. I've played PC shooters and console shooters, and both platforms offer exclusively great experiences. When I can play Uncharted III on a PC then this will make any sense.
 
Joe White said:
Thats how I like it. I prefer competitive LAN-gaming in monitored environment where players have identical hardware and are allowed to configure controls, but not graphics. I've always hated how competitive players configure games look on their own PCs.

Console gaming at least provides similar hardware and graphics for every one.
I do agree with you about keeping everything even, but cutting off everyone at the knees is a bit too much.
 
The_Player said:
I'm with you man. Can't understand this thing at all. If I want to play FPS or RTS - I play'em on PC. If I want play arcade games or fightings - consoles is my choice.
People like playing where their friends are. Many people who play on consoles started playing fps shooters with Goldeneye so a dual analog stick is just fine with them. I know plenty of PC gamers who plug in a 360 remote on PC fps even. it's a matter of preference. Some people are just fine playing on a console. Some people like control pads. Millions in fact. It's not ignorance or lowered standards as has been stated already it's a simple preference.
 
SneakyStephan said:
@FTH: You aren't goig to tell me the exlusives are a reason to play shooters on consoles right?
I get the couch argument (sort of), but pc has a way way wider array of exlusives to choose from when it comes to fps games.
Most of them are of much higher quality too.
I'm not arguing which platform is better or has more exclusives, that's childish/pointless to me. kokujin stated that ignorance is the reason people play console shooters. I'm saying that having fun with a gaming experience that's only available on console is the reason people play console shooters.

Dedicated servers are PC gaming's single biggest advantage. If consoles had that standard, I'd doubt there would be as many naysayers.
 
Joe White said:
Thats how I like it. I prefer competitive LAN-gaming in monitored environment where players have identical hardware and are allowed to configure controls, but not graphics. I've always hated how competitive players configure games look on their own PCs.

Console gaming at least provides similar hardware and graphics for every one.
The graphics settings are about getting to the absolute peak of possible play in that game and in most of them where it is done it suits them perfectly.
 
Top Bottom